Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/Judging Criteria

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 177: Line 177:
  <tr>
  <tr>
   <td>Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected.</td>
   <td>Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected.</td>
-
   <td>INSERT LINK TO PARTS PAGE.</td>
+
   <td><a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1467205">AvrBS3</a> works as expected and induces BS3.</td>
  </tr>
  </tr>
  <tr>
  <tr>
   <td>Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.</td>
   <td>Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.</td>
-
   <td>INSERT LINK TO PARTS PAGE.</td>
+
   <td>Click <a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1467205">here</a> to be taken to the page for AvrBS3</td>
  </tr>
  </tr>
  <tr>
  <tr>
   <td>Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry.</td>
   <td>Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry.</td>
-
   <td>INSERT LINK TO PARTS PAGE.</td>
+
   <td>Click <a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1467205">here</a> to be taken to the page for AvrBS3</td>
  </tr>
  </tr>

Revision as of 15:31, 13 October 2014

NRP UEA Norwich iGEM 2014

Judging Criteria

& how NRP-UEA iGEM have fulfilled it!

Bronze

Requirement Notes
Team Registration. Team is registered.
Complete Judging Form. Judging Form completed.
Team Wiki. Wiki is live.
Present a poster and talk at the iGEM Jamboree. Poster and Presentation in final stages.
The description of each project must clearly attribute work done by the students and distinguish it from work done by others, including host labs, advisors, instructors, sponsors, professional website designers, artists, and commercial services. Attributions of those outside of the team are stated within the Attributions page
Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device used in your project/central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry.
  • The apoptosis regulator Bax .
  • The plant specific promoter BS3 which is induced by the TALE AvrBS3.
  • The methyl-jasmonate induced plant specific promoter PDF 1.2
  • The AvrBS3 TAL Effector whichinduces the BS3 promoter.


  • Silver

    Requirement Notes
    Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected. AvrBS3 works as expected and induces BS3.
    Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry. Click here to be taken to the page for AvrBS3
    Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry. Click here to be taken to the page for AvrBS3
    iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Articulate at least one question encountered by your team, and describe how your team considered the(se) question(s) within your project. Include attributions to all experts and stakeholders consulted. Please see the Policy and Practices and the Attributions pages.


    Gold

    Requirement Notes
    Improve the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year), enter this information in the Registry. Please see part number BBa_J04450 for details.
    Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system. We sent Team Valencia chromoproteins (amilCP and AmilGFP in Golden Gate form) so that they could use these as reporters to check that their gene constructs were successfully transfected into their plant chassis.
    iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team’s scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM). Please see the Policy and Practices and the Attributions pages.
    A big thank you to our sponsors