Team:UESTC-China/Questionnaire.html

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 895: Line 895:
<h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px;">Analysis</h1>
<h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px;">Analysis</h1>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6e/QqImage001.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6e/QqImage001.png"></div>
-
<p align="center" width="300px">From the charts, we could get the information that, for these questionnaires, the number of male slightly exceeded the female’. And this excess is trivial enough to guarantee the scientificity of our data collected.<br/></p>
+
<p align="center" width="300px">From the charts, we could get the information that, for these questions, the number of male slightly exceeded the number of female’. And this excess is trivial enough to guarantee the scientificity of our data collected.<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/53/QqImage002.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/53/QqImage002.png"></div>
-
<p align="center" width="300px">From the charts, we could get that more than half of the people answered the questionnaire are young aged between 18 and 35. And the people between 35 and 50 also counts a crucial part. The information we get may insured the practicability and scientificity of our data collected.<br/></p>
+
<p align="center" width="300px">From the charts, we could get that more than half of the people answered the questionnaires were young aged between 18 and 35. And the people between 35 and 50 also counted a crucial part. The information we got may insured the practicability and scientificity of our data collected.<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4f/QqImage003.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4f/QqImage003.png"></div>
Line 905: Line 905:
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/1e/QqImage004.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/1e/QqImage004.png"></div>
-
<p>Due to the people received our questionnaire were mostly not graduating students in college, so the revenue people get, finding in this chart under 3,000 counts 52%. And the second most proportion is the people with the revenue between 3,000 and 6,000.<br/></p>
+
<p>Due to the people received our questionnaire were mostly not graduating students in college, so the revenue people got, finding in this chart under 3,000 counted 52%. And the second most proportion was the people with the revenue between 3,000 and 6,000.<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/db/QqImage005.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/db/QqImage005.png"></div>
Line 914: Line 914:
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/83/QqImage006.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/83/QqImage006.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
About 43% people thought that the most serious environmental problem around us is air pollutant. About 30% thought that the most serious problem is water pollution. So the urgent two environmental pollutant people care about is the factor which is crucial to our life such as air and water.
+
About 43% people thought that the most serious environmental problem around us was air pollutant. About 30% thought that the most serious problem was water pollution. So the most urgent two environmental pollutants people care about were the factors which were crucial to our life such as air and water.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
Line 925: Line 925:
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/ef/QqImage008.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/ef/QqImage008.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
About 29%people recognized that formaldehyde may lead to cancer to people. 24% considered the consequence of formaldehyde is chronic hazard. 18% thought that formaldehyde irritated skin and mucosa.
+
About 29% people recognized that formaldehyde might lead to cancer to people. 24% considered the consequence of formaldehyde was chronic hazard. 18% thought that formaldehyde irritated skin and mucosa.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8b/QqImage009.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8b/QqImage009.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
Most people preferred ventilation above all other choices. And the proportion reached 34%. Also they are fond of green plants and it counts 29%. Besides, 21% people chose activated carbon, 13% chose air purifier, rarely chose photocatalyst, which might due to the unawareness of photocatalyst in my opinion.
+
Most people preferred ventilation above all other choices. And the proportion reached 34%. Also they were fond of green plants and it counted 29%. Besides, 21% people chose activated carbon, 13% chose air purifier, rarely chose photocatalyst, which might due to the unawareness of photocatalyst in my opinion.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
Line 936: Line 936:
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/97/QqImage010.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/97/QqImage010.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
People who did not choose plants to absorb formaldehyde is mainly because of the low absorbing efficiency. Also the troublesome of cultivating a plant also counts a lot.
+
People who did not choose plants to absorb formaldehyde was mainly because of the low absorbing efficiency. Also the troublesome of cultivating a plant also counted a lot.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a4/QqImage011.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a4/QqImage011.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
About 81% people accept the plant designed by the synthetic biology. And 15% people accentuated that they minded accepting this manmade plant. What cannot be ignorable was that there were still 4% people could not accept the plant.
+
About 81% people accepted the plant designed by the synthetic biology. And 15% people accentuated that they minded accepting this manmade plant. What couldn't be ignorable was that there were still 4% people could not accept the plant.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>

Revision as of 11:31, 17 October 2014

UESTC-China