Team:IIT Delhi/Achievements

From 2014.igem.org

Revision as of 11:36, 15 October 2014 by Shashank dbeb iitd (Talk | contribs)


iGEM IIT Delhi 2014


Requirements for a Bronze Medal :
  • ✔ We registered our team for the 2014 Giant Jamboree.
  • ✔ We successfully completed and submitted this iGEM 2014 Judging form.
  • ✔ We created and shared the description of our project using the iGEM wiki and our team's parts using the Registry of Standard Biological Parts.
  • ✔ We plan to present our poster and talk at the iGEM 2014 Giant Jamboree.
  • ✔ We attributed the work done by all the people who made this project possible. The attibutions can be seen at:https://2014.igem.org/Team:IIT_Delhi/Attributions
  • ✔ We documented three new standard BioBrick Parts and submitted these parts to the iGEM Registry.

Additional Requirements for a Silver Medal :
  • ✔We experimentally validated that our new BioBrick Parts works as expected, the validation can be seen at the following links:
  • ✔ We documented the characterization of these parts in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.
  • ✔ We submitted these new parts to the iGEM Parts Registry (our submissions adhered to the iGEM Registry guidelines).
  • ✔We articulated important questions encountered by our team and described how our team considered these questions within your project. We also included attributions to all experts and stakeholders consulted.

    • Additional Requirements for a Gold Medal :
      • Improve the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device enter this information in the Registry. Part Number(s): None Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system. Link to page on your team's wiki: None iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team's scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM). We encourage thoughtful and creative approaches, and those that draw on past Policy & Practice (formerly Human Practices) activities. Link to page on your team's wiki: None iGEM Prizes All teams are eligible for special prizes at the Jamborees. (more...) To help the judges, please indicate if you feel you should be evaluated for any of the following special prizes: Best Supporting Art & Design Our team will present an art installation at the Giant Jamboree Link to page on your team's wiki: None Short description of team's accomplishments (500 chars max): Best Policy & Practice Advance Link to page on your team's wiki: None Short description of team's accomplishments (500 chars max): Best Measurement Approach Link to page on your team's wiki: None Short description of team's accomplishments (500 chars max): Best Supporting Software Link to page on your team's wiki: None Short description of team's accomplishments (500 chars max): Team_Parts To help the judges evaluate your parts, please identify 3 of your parts that you feel are best documented and are of the highest quality. Best New Basic Part Part Number(s): None Best New Composit Part Part Number(s): None Best Part Collection Link to page on your team's wiki: None Short description of collection function and Range of Part Numbers List all of the Parts in this collection (Yes, all 100 of them to impress the judges) Part Number(s): None