Team:Paris Bettencourt/Notebook/TMAU

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(31 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
height : 300px;
height : 300px;
margin-top : 40px;
margin-top : 40px;
-
background-image : url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/43/Something_fishy.png");
+
background-image : url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/2d/NotebookPB.png");
        background-size : cover;
        background-size : cover;
background-color : transparent;
background-color : transparent;
 +
}
 +
.nameimg {
 +
position : absolute;
 +
width : 300px;
 +
height : 200px;
 +
margin-left : 10%;
 +
background : transparent;
 +
z-index : 60;
}
}
Line 71: Line 79:
                         overflow-wrap : break-word;
                         overflow-wrap : break-word;
}
}
 +
                #corps ul {
 +
                        list-style : disc;
 +
                }
                 TABLE {
                 TABLE {
                         margin-left : 10%;
                         margin-left : 10%;
Line 202: Line 213:
                 }
                 }
#moocdiv table tr td a {
#moocdiv table tr td a {
-
color : rgb(193,192,197);
+
color : rgb(143,142,147);
                         font-size : 15px;
                         font-size : 15px;
text-decoration : none;
text-decoration : none;
Line 231: Line 242:
<body>
<body>
<div id="topheader">
<div id="topheader">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b9/Somethingfishy.png" class=nameimg>
</div>
</div>
<div id=moocdiv>
<div id=moocdiv>
Line 337: Line 349:
<p> The PCR worked.</p>
<p> The PCR worked.</p>
-
<p>Miniprep using Thermo scientific kits in order to concentrate pSB1C3
+
<p>Miniprep using <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Protocols#prot1" >Thermo scientific kits</a>
-
1- Resuspend the pelleted cells in 250 &#956;L of the Resuspension Solution. Transfer the cell suspension to a microcentrifuge tube. The bacteria should be resuspended completely by vortexing or pipetting up and down until no cell clumps remain.<br />
+
-
Note: Ensure RNase A has been added to the Resuspension Solution (as described on p.3)<br />
+
-
2- Add 250 &#956;L of the Lysis Solution and mix thoroughly by inverting the tube 4-6 times until the solution becomes viscous and slightly clear.<br />
+
-
Note:. Do not vortex to avoid shearing of chromosomal DNA. Do not incubate for more than 5min to avoid denaturation of supercoiled plasmid DNA.<br />
+
-
3- Add 350 &#956;L of the Neutralization Solution and mix immediately and thoroughly by inverting the tube 4-6 times.<br />
+
-
Note: It is important to mix thoroughly and gently after the addition of the Neutralization Solution to avoid localized precipitation of bacterial cell debris.The neutralized bacterial lysate should become cloudy.<br />
+
-
4- Centrifuge for 5 min to pellet cell debris and chromosomal DNA.<br />
+
-
5- Transfer the supernatant to the supplied GeneJET spin column by decanting or pipetting. Avoid disturbing or transferring the white precipitate.<br />
+
-
Note. Close the bag with GeneJET Spin Columns tightly after each use!<br />
+
-
6- Centrifuge for 1 min. Discard the flow-through and place the column back into the same collection tube.<br />
+
-
Note: Do not add bleach to the flow-through, see p.7 for Safety Information.<br />
+
-
7- Add 500 &#956;L of the Wash Solution (diluted with ethanol prior to first use as described on p.3) to the GeneJET spin column. Centrifuge for 30-60 seconds and discard the flow-through. Place the column back into the same collection tube.<br />
+
-
8- Repeat the wash procedure (step 7) using 500 &#956;L of the Wash Solution.<br />
+
-
9- Discard the flow-through and centrifuge for an additional 1 min to remove residual. Wash Solution. This step is essential to avoid residual ethanol in plasmid preps.<br />
+
-
10- Transfer the GeneJET spin column into a fresh 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube (not included). Add 50 &#956;L of the Elution Buffer to the center of GeneJET spin column membrane to elute the plasmid DNA. Take care not to contact the membrane with the pipette tip. Incubate for 2 min at room temperature and centrifuge for 2 min. (HERE I USED 30 uL OF HOT WATER).<br />
+
-
Note: An additional elution step (optional) with Elution Buffer or water will recover residual DNA from the membrane and increase the overall yield by10-20%. For elution of plasmids or cosmids >20 kb, prewarm Elution Buffer to 70&deg;C before applying to silica membrane.<br />
+
-
11- Discard the column and store the purified plasmid DNA at -20&deg;C.</p>
+
</br>
</br>
</br>
</br>
Line 402: Line 397:
<p>Transformation of the part.</p>
<p>Transformation of the part.</p>
-
<p>Strain: E.coli MG1655<br />
+
<p>Strain: <i>E.coli</i> MG1655<br />
plasmid: pPB.011<br />
plasmid: pPB.011<br />
  <br />
  <br />
Line 412: Line 407:
  </p>
  </p>
-
<p>Thaw competent cells on ice. These can be prepared using the CaCl2 protocol.<br />
 
-
Place 20 ul of cells in a pre-chilled Eppendorf tube.<br />
 
-
For a Ligation Product: Add 2-3 ul to the chilled cells.<br />
 
-
Mix gently by flicking the tube.<br />
 
-
Chill on ice for 10 minutes. This step is optional, but can improve yields when transforming a ligation product.<br />
 
-
Heat shock at 42 &deg;C for 30 seconds.<br />
 
-
Return to ice for 2 minutes.<br />
 
-
Add 200 ul LB medium and recover the cells by shaking at 37 &deg;C.<br />
 
-
Chloramphenicol: 60-120 minutes<br />
 
-
Plate out the cells on selective LB.<br />
 
-
Use glass beads to spread the cells.<br />
 
-
The volume of cells plated depends on what is being transformed.<br />
 
-
For a Ligation Product: Lower transformation efficiencies are expected. Therefore you can plate the entire 200 ul volume of recovered cells.<br />
 
-
Note: 200 ul is the maximum volume of liquid that an LB plate can absorb.<br />
 
-
Incubate at 37 &deg;C. Transformants should appear within 12 hrs.</p>
 
-
</br>
 
<p> No colonies after 24h, this might be due to the low concentration of reagents</p>
<p> No colonies after 24h, this might be due to the low concentration of reagents</p>
Line 436: Line 415:
<p>We finally had no colonies.</p>
<p>We finally had no colonies.</p>
</br>
</br>
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
<h5 id="date">July 10th</h5>
<h5 id="date">July 10th</h5>
Line 845: Line 819:
</br>
</br>
<h5 id="date">August 21st</h5>
<h5 id="date">August 21st</h5>
-
<p>E.coli competent cells (NEB turbo) were transformed with tmm+pSEVA351 and tmm+pSB1C3 ligation products using the <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Protocols#prot5" >Heat Shock transformation protocol</a>. On August 22nd we got 4 colonies of NEB transformed with tmm+pSB1C3. </p>
+
<p><i>E.coli</i> competent cells (NEB turbo) were transformed with tmm+pSEVA351 and tmm+pSB1C3 ligation products using the <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Protocols#prot5" >Heat Shock transformation protocol</a>. On August 22nd we got 4 colonies of NEB transformed with tmm+pSB1C3. </p>
<h5 id="date">August 25th</h5>
<h5 id="date">August 25th</h5>
<p>A <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Protocols#prot7" >colony PCR</a> was done with 2 different colonies but the result was not convincing.</p>
<p>A <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Protocols#prot7" >colony PCR</a> was done with 2 different colonies but the result was not convincing.</p>
Line 868: Line 842:
<h5 id="date">September 1st</h5>
<h5 id="date">September 1st</h5>
<p> tmm also has to be cloned using pSEVA351 so that we can transform into C.striatum.</p>
<p> tmm also has to be cloned using pSEVA351 so that we can transform into C.striatum.</p>
-
<p>E.coli was transformed using tmm+pSEVA351 ligation product from August 18th with <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Protocols#prot3" >electroporation</a>. It did not work on the first time.</p>
+
<p><i>E.coli</i> was transformed using tmm+pSEVA351 ligation product from August 18th with <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Protocols#prot3" >electroporation</a>. It did not work on the first time.</p>
<h5 id="date">September 3rd</h5>
<h5 id="date">September 3rd</h5>
<p>A new ligation of tmm and pSEVA351 was done:</p>
<p>A new ligation of tmm and pSEVA351 was done:</p>
Line 880: Line 854:
<p>The tube was incubated 1H at 22°C and overnight at 4°C.</p>
<p>The tube was incubated 1H at 22°C and overnight at 4°C.</p>
<h5 id="date">September 4th</h5>
<h5 id="date">September 4th</h5>
-
<p>A new electroporation was done with the same <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Protocols#prot3" >protocol</a>.Some colonies developped. Two of them were transfered in LB+Chlormaphenicol and two glycerol stocks were made with the strains called sPB.054 and sPB.055.</p>
+
<p>A new electroporation was done with the same <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Protocols#prot3" >protocol</a>.Some colonies developped. Two of them were transfered in LB+Chlormaphenicol and two glycerol stocks were made with the strains called sPB.054 and sPB.055. Analytical digestion was performed on these strains: miniprep and digestion using XbaI and SpeI. The gel showed nothing corresponding to <i>tmm</i>.</p>
-
<p id="text">Text</p>
+
                                        <h5 id="date">September 25th</h5>
-
<p id="text">Text</p>
+
<p>The cloning was tried again from the beginning. 2 new pairs of primers were designed: 1 pair (oPB.087 and oPB.088) corresponding to pSB1C3 cloning including XbaI and PstI restriction sites and 1 pair (oPB.089 and oPB.090) corresponding to pSEVA315 cloning including XbaI and HindIII restriction sites. The gBlock was amplified using the first pair (PCR1) and the second pair (PCR2) of primers. The DNA template is <i>tmm</i> gBlock diluted 1:50.</p>
-
<h5 id="date">Date 2</h5>
+
<TABLE BORDER>
-
<p id="text">Text</p>
+
<TR><TD><b>Reagent</b></TD><TD><b>Volume</b></TD></TR>
-
<p id="text">Text</p>
+
<TR><TD></TD><TD>1X</TD><TD>4X</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>5X Phusion HF Buffer</TD><TD>20uL</TD><TD>80uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>10mM dNTPs</TD><TD>2uL</TD><TD>8uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>Forward primer</TD><TD>1uL</TD><TD>4uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>Reverse primer</TD><TD>1uL</TD><TD>4uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>DNA</TD><TD>1uL</TD><TD>4uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>DMSO</TD><TD>3uL</TD><TD>12uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>Phusion polymerase</TD><TD>1uL</TD><TD>4uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>Nuclease Free Water</TD><TD>71uL</TD><TD>284uL</TD></TR>
 +
</TABLE>
 +
</br>
 +
<p>We used this thermocycle:</p>
 +
<TABLE BORDER>
 +
<TR><TD></TD><TD><b>Temperature</b></TD><TD><b>Time</b></TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>Start</b></TD><TD>98°C</TD><TD>30s</TD></TR>
 +
<TR></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>Cycle x35</b></TD><TD>98°C</TD><TD>10s</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>Cycle x35</b></TD><TD>52°C</TD><TD>30s</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>Cycle x35</b></TD><TD>72°C</TD><TD>40s</TD></TR>
 +
<TR></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>Finish</b></TD><TD>72°C</TD><TD>5min</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>Blind</b></TD><TD>10°C</TD><TD>-</TD></TR>
 +
</TABLE>
 +
<p>On the gel the bands look perfect. After purification, the concentration is 80ng/uL.</p>
 +
<img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/84/PCRJake.png' width='50%'></p>
 +
                                        <h5 id="date">September 26th</h5>
 +
<p>The PCR products were digested:</p>
 +
<p><u>1 - oPB.087 and oPB.088</u></p>
 +
<p>Digest with XbaI, PstI. Product is 80 ng/ul.</p>
 +
<TABLE BORDER>
 +
<TR><TD><b>Reagent</b></TD><TD><b>Volume</b></TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>Nuclease free water</TD><TD>135uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>10X Fast Digest Buffer</TD><TD>20uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>PCR product</TD><TD>30uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>FastDigest XbaI</TD><TD>10uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>FastDigest PstI</TD><TD>10uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><i>TOTAL</i></TD><TD>200uL</TD></TR>
 +
</TABLE>
 +
<p> The tubes were incubated at 37°C for 1H. After purification, the concentration was 26ng/uL.</p>
 +
</br>
 +
<p><u>2 - oPB.089 and oPB.090</u></p>
 +
<p>Digest with XbaI, HindIII. Product is 80 ng/ul.</p>
 +
<TABLE BORDER>
 +
<TR><TD><b>Reagent</b></TD><TD><b>Volume</b></TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>Nuclease free water</TD><TD>135uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>10X Fast Digest Buffer</TD><TD>20uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>PCR product</TD><TD>30uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>FastDigest XbaI</TD><TD>10uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>FastDigest HindIII</TD><TD>10uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><i>TOTAL</i></TD><TD>200uL</TD></TR>
 +
</TABLE>
 +
<p> The tubes were incubated at 37°C for 1H. After purification, the concentration was 33ng/uL.</p>
 +
</br>
 +
<p>Digestion of pSEVA315</p>
 +
<TABLE BORDER>
 +
<TR><TD><b>Reagent</b></TD><TD><b>Volume</b></TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>Nuclease free water</TD><TD>155uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>10X Fast Digest Buffer</TD><TD>20uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>Plasmid</TD><TD>15uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>FastDigest XbaI</TD><TD>5uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>FastDigest HindIII</TD><TD>5uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>FastAP</TD><TD>5uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><i>TOTAL</i></TD><TD>200uL</TD></TR>
 +
</TABLE>
 +
<p> The tubes were incubated at 37°C for 1H. After purification, the concentration was 38ng/uL.</p>
</br>
</br>
 +
                                        <h5 id="date">September 29th</h5>
 +
<p><b>Ligation and transformation</b></p>
 +
<TABLE BORDER>
 +
<TR><TD></TD><TD><b>Volume</b></TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>Insert (XbaI, PstI) 26ng/uL</b></TD><TD>3uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>Digested pSB1C3 (XbaI, PstI) 6.5ng/uL</b></TD><TD>12uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>T4 Ligase</b></TD><TD>1uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>T4 Ligase Buffer</b></TD><TD>2uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>NF Water</b></TD><TD>2uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><i>TOTAL</i></TD><TD>20uL</TD></TR>
 +
</TABLE>
 +
<TABLE BORDER>
 +
<TR><TD></TD><TD><b>Volume</b></TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>Insert (XbaI, HindIII) 33ng/uL</b></TD><TD>2uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>Digested pSEVA315 (XbaI, HindIII) 38ng/uL</b></TD><TD>2uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>T4 Ligase</b></TD><TD>1uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>T4 Ligase Buffer</b></TD><TD>2uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><b>NF Water</b></TD><TD>13uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><i>TOTAL</i></TD><TD>20uL</TD></TR>
 +
</TABLE>
 +
<p>The transformation was performed according to the <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Protocols#prot5" >Heat Shock transformation protocol</a>.
 +
<p>After 24h, we observed many colonies, including some dark ones which could be due to indigo produced by TMM. These dark colonies were transfered in order to miniprep them and do an analytical digestion.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="October">
<div id="October">
<h4>October</h4>
<h4>October</h4>
 +
<h5 id="date">October 1st</h5>
 +
<p>After miniprep, the plasmids were digested.</p>
 +
<TABLE BORDER>
 +
<TR><TD><b>Reagent</b></TD><TD><b>Volume</b></TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>Nuclease free water</TD><TD>13uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>10X Fast Digest Buffer</TD><TD>2uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>Plasmid</TD><TD>3uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>FastDigest XbaI</TD><TD>1uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD>FastDigest PstI or HindIII</TD><TD>1uL</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD><i>TOTAL</i></TD><TD>20uL</TD></TR>
 +
</TABLE>
 +
<p>On the gel, we can see bands at 1.5kb corresponding to <i>tmm</i> (<i>tmm</i>+pSB1C3 on the left and <i>tmm</i>+pSEVA315 on the right). The cloning worked.</p>
 +
<p>Glycerol stocks were prepared with these strains called sPB.091 (pSB1C3) and sPB.092 (pSEVA315).</p>
 +
<h5 id="date">October 8th</h5>
<h5 id="date">October 8th</h5>
-
<p id="text">TMM activity was found in E.coli pSB1C3-TMM (tmm+) but not in E.coli pSB1C3 (tmm-). TMM does not only degrade trimethylamine into trimethylamine-N-oxide, but also converts indole into indigo. To measure the activity of TMM, the growth medium was supplemented with tryptophan, a precursor of indole, which is the substrate of TMM. After 14h of culture, cells were pelleted, washed with water twice, and then resuspended in DMSO and sonicated. TMM activity was determined by measuring the absorbance spectrum of bacterial extractions. Peaks at 620 nm were found in tmm+ cultures supplemented with tryptophan, which was identified as indigo according absorbance spectrum analysis.</p>
+
<p id="text">TMM activity was found in <i>E.coli</i> pSB1C3-TMM (tmm+) but not in <i>E.coli</i> pSB1C3 (tmm-). TMM does not only degrade trimethylamine into trimethylamine-N-oxide, but also converts indole into indigo. To measure the activity of TMM, the growth medium was supplemented with tryptophan, a precursor of indole, which is the substrate of TMM. After 14h of culture, cells were pelleted, washed with water twice, and then resuspended in DMSO and sonicated. TMM activity was determined by measuring the absorbance spectrum of bacterial extractions. Peaks at 620 nm were found in tmm+ cultures supplemented with tryptophan, which was identified as indigo according absorbance spectrum analysis.</p>
-
<p>Details: we made a overnight preculture of 2 strains (sPB.026: control and sPB.091: pSB1C3+tmm) in LB+Cm. Then, the cells were resuspended and diluted in 3 tubes of each to get a OD600 of 0.2 (beginning of the exponential phase). The resuspension solution was LB or LB supplemented with tryptophane (2g/L): 3 tubes +tmm +TRP, 3 tubes -tmm +TRP, 3 tubes +tmm -TRP and 3 tubes -tmm -TRP. After 14h of culture at 37°C, the cells were washed twice (centrifugation 4000<i>g</i> 10min and resuspension in 10mL of water) and resuspended in 1mL DMSO. After having sonicated the cells, the solution was centrifuged (4000<i>g</i> 10min) and the supernatant was transfered into cuvettes to measure the absorbance spectrum. The results are in <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b8/Indigo_spectrum_PB.xls" >protocol</a> this file.</p>
+
<p>Details: we made a overnight preculture of 2 strains (sPB.026: control and sPB.091: pSB1C3+tmm) in LB+Cm. Then, the cells were resuspended and diluted in 3 tubes of each to get a OD600 of 0.2 (beginning of the exponential phase). The resuspension solution was LB or LB supplemented with tryptophane (2g/L): 3 tubes +tmm +TRP, 3 tubes -tmm +TRP, 3 tubes +tmm -TRP and 3 tubes -tmm -TRP. After 14h of culture at 37°C, the cells were washed twice (centrifugation 4000<i>g</i> 10min and resuspension in 10mL of water) and resuspended in 1mL DMSO. After having sonicated the cells, the solution was centrifuged (4000<i>g</i> 10min) and the supernatant was transfered into cuvettes to measure the absorbance spectrum. The results are in <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b8/Indigo_spectrum_PB.xls" >this file</a> .</p>
 +
<img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a9/Tubes_indigoPB.png' width='50%'>
<img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/ae/Absorbance_indigoPB.JPG' width='80%'>
<img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/ae/Absorbance_indigoPB.JPG' width='80%'>
-
<p id="text">October 9th</p>
+
<h5 id="date">October 9th</h5>
-
<p> A dilution scale of TMA was prepared to determine what is the lowest concentration people can smell in order to know which concentration we have to use in the olfactory experiment. Concentrations from 1M to 1uM were prepared with serial dilutions.</p>
+
<p> A dilution scale of TMA was prepared to determine what is the lowest concentration people can smell in order to know which concentration we have to use in the olfactory experiment. Concentrations from 1M to 1uM were prepared with serial dilutions. 10 people were asked to smell the tubes from the lowest concentration and to stop when they smell fish odor. The results show that most of people smell trimethylamine from to a concentration of 1mM.</p>
-
<h5 id="date">Date 2</h5>
+
<img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/cb/Can_you_smell_fish_odor.JPG' width='60%'>
-
<p id="text">Text</p>
+
 
 +
<h5 id="date">October 9th</h5>
 +
<p>GC/MS analysis were performed in the chemistry lab of Paris-Diderot University. We prepared overnight precultures of TMM-expressing <i>E. coli</i> and <i>E. coli</i> expressing empty pSB1C3. After having diluted them in LB to get an OD600 of 0.2, we added 1mM of TMA and incubated the tubes for 36H at 37°C. Then we brought the tubes for the analysis and got these figures.</p>
 +
 
 +
<img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b3/TMM_GCMS.png' width='120%'>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<h5 id="date">October 15th</h5>
 +
<p id="text"><i>C.striatum</i> was transformed with pSVEA351 containing <i>tmm</i> gene. according to <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Protocols#prot11" >this protocol</a>. 70mL LB medium were supplemented with 7mL of 50% glucose solution. After 2h of recovery, the cells were plated on LB supplemented with chloramphenicol plates (one with 20uL and one with 200uL). Another plating was done the day after (20uL and 200uL).
<p id="text">Text</p>
<p id="text">Text</p>
</br>
</br>

Latest revision as of 03:18, 18 October 2014



Notebook

June

June 24th

oPB.010 received
oPB.010
tmm Fw for BioBrick vector
TATAGAATTCGCGGCCGCTTCTAGAGCTGACAGCTAGCTCAGTCCTAG

June 29th

Goal: to PCR ilvBN gene from MG1655

Procedure:
1. Picked 2 colonies from the plate MG1655 115+GFP
2. inoculate them each in 50 ul of NF H2O
3. Boiled for 3 mins at 98 degree
4. use the solution as DNA template
5. follow standard PCR protocol from this step on

Reagent Volume 1x
Nuclease-free water 63 ul
5x Phusion HF Buffer 20 ul
10 mM dNTPs 2 ul
Forward Primer (10 uM) 5 ul
Reverse Primer (10 uM) 5 ul
Genomic DNA template 1 ul
DMSO 3 ul
Phusion DNA Polymerase 1 ul
Total Volume 100 ul

Thermocycler protocol: NEB Phusion
Temp Time
Start 98 ° C 30 sec Melt

35 Cycles
Cycle 1 98 ° C 10 sec Melt
Cycle 2 52 ° C 30 sec Anneal
Cycle 3 72 ° C 2 minutes Extend

Finish 72 ° C 5 min Extend
Blind 10 ° C Forever
Blind

outcome:

bands seen at expected length.

July

July 3rd

We made a PCR of our tmm gBlock using this protocol:

ReagentVolume
1X4X
5X Phusion HF Buffer20uL80uL
10mM dNTPs2uL8uL
oPB.010 (forward primer)1uL4uL
oPB.012 (reverse primer)1uL4uL
DNA1uL4uL
DMSO3uL12uL
Phusion polymerase1uL4uL
Nuclease Free Water71uL284uL

We used this thermocycle:

TemperatureTime
Start98°C30s
Cycle x3598°C10s
Cycle x3552°C30s
Cycle x3572°C30s
Finish72°C5min
Blind10°C-

After gel migration, we got this:

The PCR worked.

Miniprep using Thermo scientific kits

Digestion using EcoR1 and Pst1

Extracted plasmids from miniprep 22 uL 30uL
FD Buffer 5uL 5uL
Pst1 2.5uL 2.5uL
EcoR1 2.5uL 2.5uL
NF Water 18uL 10uL

Incubation for 5min 37°C and 2 hours at room temperature.



Ligation of gBlock into Vector

PCR product: tmm gBlock with oPB.010 and oPB.012
Vector: pSB1C3 linearized

Concentration:
-digested PSB1C3: 4.6ng/uL
-digested tmm: 13.7ng/uL

Cohesive Ends
5X Ligase Reaction Buffer 4 μl

Insert: Vector Molar Ratio 3:1

Vector Ends 5ul

Insert Ends 5ul

Total DNA 0.092ug(0.01-0.1 μg)

T4 DNA Ligase 0.1 unit

Autoclaved distilled water to 20 μl

Incubate at 24°C for O/N.

Note: For optimal transformation, dilute the ligation reaction ≥ 5-fold, to at least 100 μl, before adding to competent cells

July 5th

Transformation of the part.

Strain: E.coli MG1655
plasmid: pPB.011

Heat Shock Transformation of E. coli

This protocol can be used to transform chemically competent (i.e. from CaCl2) with a miniprepped plasmid or a ligation product.

Note: Never vortex competent cells. Mix cells by gentle shaking.

No colonies after 24h, this might be due to the low concentration of reagents

July 12th

We transformed NEB and MG1655 with our ligation product according to this protocol

We finally had no colonies.


July 10th

1) Mini prep to extract plasmids (Qiagen)

I used this protocol. I made 2 tubes and got 163.2 and 242 ng/uL as concentrations.

2) Digestion of miniprep product with EcoR1 & Pst1

Tube 1 (163ng/uL)Tube 2 (242ng/uL)
pSB1C3 from miniprep22uL30uL
10X FD Buffer5uL5uL
PstI2.5uL2.5uL
EcoRI2.5uL2.5uL
NF Water18uL10uL

3) Gel migration

I had the digested pSB1C3 run on a gel using 0.5X TBE (2H-50V). We clearly saw a band at 2kb corresponding to pSB1C3. I cut the gel and stored it at 4°C.

July 11th

1) Gel purification of digested pSB1C3

I used this protocol

Result: I got concentrations of 59.6 and 55.1 ng/uL.


2) Ligation of digested tmm and digested pSB1C3

I used NEBiocalculator to calculate the mass of insert and vector I had to put (Insert length: 1488 bp, Vector length: 2037 bp, Vector DNA mass: 0,3 ug, Ratio insert:vector: 2:1). I need to put 450ng of insert and 300 ng of vector.

Volume
Insert (tmm)20uL of 10.1 ng/uL and 20uL of 13.7 ng/uL
Vector (pSB1C3)5uL of 59.6ng/uL
T4 Ligase3uL
T4 Ligase Buffer6uL
NF Water6uL

I incubated overnight at room temperature

July 14th


July 15th

1) Gel extraction of pSB1C3 digested plasmid

I used this protocol. I finally got 2 tubes with 13.9 and 19.8ng/uL concentrations.


2) PCR purification

I purified the PCR product of July 14th using this protocol.


3) Ligation of tmm PCR product and pSB1C3

I used NEBiocalculator to to calculate the needed amount of insert and vector with the values:

  • Insert length: 1488 bp
  • Vector length: 2037 bp
  • Vector DNA mass: 50 ng
  • Ratio insert: I made 1 ligation of ratio 1:1, 2:1 and 3:1 (insert:vector).

I made the ligation with the 13.9 ng/uL concentrated insert tube. I used this protocol:

1:12:13:1
Digested tmm (insert)1.5uL3uL4uL
Digested pSB1C3 (vector)4uL4uL4uL
T4 Ligase1uL1uL1uL
T4 Ligase Buffer4uL4uL4uL
Nuclease Free water9.5uL8uL7uL

I incubated the tubes at 24°C for 30min.


4) Transformation into NEB and MG1655

I used the Heat Shock transformation protocol to transform NEB and MG1655 with each one of the ligation products with ratios 1:1, 2:1 and 3:1 (I got 6 plates).



July 16th

1) Results of the transformations

We got no colonies in MG1655, big and small colonies for 1:1 and 2:1 ratios and only big colonies with 3:1 ratios. I prepared 5 liquid cultures in LB+Chloramphenicol: 1 for each type of colony for 1:1 and 2:1 ratios, and 1 for big colonies for 3:1 ratio. I incubated them at 37°C.


2) PCR colony

To check if the colonies developped in my plates have tmm gene, I made a PCR with this protocol and I ran a gel. I got nothing on it. I will do miniprep and digestion on July 17th to identify tmm construct into pSB1C3.



July 17th

1) Miniprep using each liquid culture of NEB+tmm-pSB1C3

I used this protocol.

2) Digestion of the plasmids by EcoRI

Then I digested the miniprep product by EcoRI in order to get a linearised plasmid before running it on a gel.

ReagentVolume
Nuclease free water12uL
10X Fast Digest Buffer2uL
plasmid DNA5uL
EcoRI1uL
TOTAL20uL

I incubated the tubes at 37°C during 30min.


3) Gel

I ran on a gel each one of the tubes (small and big colonies from 1:1 and 2:1 ratios and big colony from 3:1 ratio). But the plasmids may have not been digested enough because I got many bands.



July 18th

I will try again to identify tmm gene in my transformed bacteria.

1) Digestion of plasmids with EcoRI and PstI.

This time I digested by EcoRI and PstI to be able to directly identify tmm gene on the gel. I nanodroped the miniprep product from 17th. We need 1ug of DNA for the digestion.

Concentration (ng/uL, given by Nanodrop)Needed volume (uL)
big 1:1 ratio colony316.43.5
small 2:1 ratio colony156.97
big 2:1 ratio colony207.65
big 3:1 ratio colony207.64

Digestion protocol:

Reagentbig 1:1 ratio colonysmall 2:1 ratio colonybig 2:1 ratio colonybig 3:1 ratio colony
Nuclease free water13.5uL10uL12uL13uL
10X Fast Digest Buffer2uL2uL2uL2uL
plasmid DNA3.5uL7uL5uL4uL
EcoRI0.5uL0.5uL0.5uL0.5uL
PstI0.5uL0.5uL0.5uL0.5uL
TOTAL20uL20uL20uL20uL

1)Gel

I ran all the samples on a gel but I did not get the bands I expected. We have to try a new cloning.



July 22nd

I had prepared liquid cultures to be able to do minipreps.

1) Miniprep of liquid cultures to get pSB1C3

I used this protocol. The Nanodrop gave me a concentration of 317ng/uL.


2) Digestion of pSB1C3 and tmm PCR product by EcoRI and PstI.

  • pSB1C3:
    ReagentVolume
    Nuclease free water25uL
    10X Fast Digest Buffer5uL
    plasmid DNA14uL
    EcoRI2.5uL
    PstI2.5uL
    Fast AP (phosphatase)1uL
    TOTAL40uL

  • tmm PCR product
    ReagentVolume
    Nuclease free water27uL
    10X Fast Digest Buffer5uL
    plasmid DNA13uL
    EcoRI2.5uL
    PstI2.5uL
    TOTAL50uL

3)Gel

For pSB1C3 we can see two bands corresponding to 900bp and 2000bp (backbone) fragments. I will be able to extract the 2000bp fragment. But I got nothing for tmm.


4)Gel extraction

I used this protocol.

July 29th

We need tmm PCR product to be able to do a new cloning.

1) PCR of tmm gBlock

ReagentVolume
1X
5X Phusion HF Buffer10uL
10mM dNTPs1uL
oPB.010 (forward primer)0.5uL
oPB.012 (reverse primer)0.5uL
DNA1uL
DMSO1.5uL
Phusion polymerase0.5uL
Nuclease Free Water35uL

We used this thermocycle:

TemperatureTime
Start98°C30s
Cycle x3598°C10s
Cycle x3556°C for tube 1, 51°C for tubes 2 and 330s
Cycle x3572°C1min
Finish72°C5min
Blind10°C-

2) Gel

No bands were visible, even for the ladder. I tried a new one and got a few tiny bands for tube 3, particularly at 1500bp. I tried a gel extraction using this protocol and got 4.7ng/uL (unusable). I tried otherwise:


3) PCR purification

I puridied tube 3 according to this protocol and got a concentration of 11ng/uL which was not enough to do a digestion.


4) New PCR

ReagentVolume
1X
5X Phusion HF Buffer10uL
10mM dNTPs1uL
oPB.010 (forward primer)0.5uL
oPB.012 (reverse primer)0.5uL
DNA1uL
DMSO1.5uL
Phusion polymerase0.5uL
Nuclease Free Water35uL

We used this thermocycle:

TemperatureTime
Start98°C30s
Cycle x3598°C10s
Cycle x3555°C30s
Cycle x3572°C1min
Finish72°C5min
Blind10°C-

3) PCR purification

I puridied tube 3 according to this protocol.

August

August 1st

1)Digestion of purified PCR product

ReagentVolume
Nuclease free water20uL
10X Fast Digest Buffer20uL
plasmid DNA7uL
EcoRI0.5uL
PstI0.5uL
TOTAL50uL

I incubated the digestion at 37°C during 1h.

2) Purification of digested tmm

I used this protocol and got a really low concentration, unusable for ligation.

3) New PCR

I prepared 4 tubes according to this protocol:

ReagentVolume
1X
5X Phusion HF Buffer10uL
10mM dNTPs1uL
oPB.010 (forward primer)0.5uL
oPB.012 (reverse primer)0.5uL
DNA1uL
DMSO1.5uL
Phusion polymerase0.5uL
Nuclease Free Water35uL

We used this thermocycle:

TemperatureTime
Start98°C30s
Cycle x3598°C10s
Cycle x3551°C30s
Cycle x3572°C1min
Finish72°C5min
Blind10°C-

4) Gel

Nothing was visible on the gel.


5) New PCR

ReagentVolume
1X
5X Phusion HF Buffer20uL
10mM dNTPs2uL
oPB.010 (forward primer)5uL
oPB.012 (reverse primer)5uL
DNA1uL
DMSO3uL
Phusion polymerase2uL
Nuclease Free Water53uL

We used this thermocycle:

TemperatureTime
Start98°C30s
Cycle x3598°C10s
Cycle x3550°C30s
Cycle x3572°C45s
Finish72°C5min
Blind10°C-

6) Gel

There was a diffused band next to 200bp. Maybe there is a problem of specificity of the primers. We will try a PCR with the very first protocol which worked.


August 5th

1) PCR of tmm gBlock

ReagentVolume
1X
5X Phusion HF Buffer20uL
10mM dNTPs2uL
oPB.010 (forward primer)1uL
oPB.012 (reverse primer)1uL
tmm DNA1uL
DMSO3uL
Phusion polymerase1uL
Nuclease Free Water71uL

We used this thermocycle:

TemperatureTime
Start98°C30s
Cycle x3598°C10s
Cycle x3552°C30s
Cycle x3572°C30s
Finish72°C5min
Blind10°C-

We still got nothing. We decided to design new primers.
August 6th

We think that that the reverse primer (oPB012) might have a strong secondary structure and that it may prevent the PCR to work as expected. We designed modified versions of oPB010 and oPB012 respectively called oPB056 and oPB057, shorter then the first ones. We removed the first restriction site at each end making sure the other enzyme would still have enough nucleotides to bind. We also shortened the bind part to have a melting temperature around 52°C.


oPB.010 TATAGAATTCGCGGCCGCTTCTAGAGCTGACAGCTAGCTCAGTCCTAG
-> oPB.056 CTTCTAGAGCTGACAGCTAGCTCAGTCC

oPB.012 TTAACTGCAGCGGCCGCTACTAGTATCAGTGGTGATGGTGATGATGGTTA
-> oPB.057 TACTAGTATCAGTGGTGATGGTGATGATG

Note:The digestion should now use XbaI and SpeI as EcorI and PstI were removed from the PCR product.

August 13th

We received our new primers (oPB.056 and oPB.057).


1) New PCR with different combinations or primers

We used this protocol:

ReagentTube 1Tube 2Tube 3Tube 4
5X Phusion HF Buffer20uL20uL20uL20uL
10mM dNTPs2uL2uL2uL2uL
tmm DNA10L10L10L10L
DMSO3uL3uL3uL3uL
Phusion polymerase2uL2uL2uL2uL
Nuclease Free Water53uL53uL53uL53uL
oPB.0105uL-5uL-
oPB.0125uL--5uL
oPB.056-5uL-5uL
oPB.057-5uL5uL-
TOTAL100uL100uL100uL100uL

We used this thermocycle:

TemperatureTime
Start98°C30s
Cycle x3598°C10s
Cycle x3552°C30s
Cycle x3572°C30s
Finish72°C5min
Blind10°C-
August 14th

After having ran the PCR product on a gel, only one PCR seemed to have worked and the yield was very low. We made a new PCR with the same protocol except a longer elongation time (2min) and it worked: after purification, we got a concentration of 584ng/uL.

We also digested tmm PCR product, pSB1C3 and pSEVA351 before doing a ligation:

tmmpSEVA351pSB1C3
NF Water18uL14uL27uL
10X FD Buffer4uL4uL4uL
XbaI1uL1uL1uL
SpeI1uL1uL1uL
DNA14uL18uL5uL
FastAP2uL2uL2uL
TOTAL40uL40uL40uL

August 18th

The digestion products were purified and we got these concentrations: 84.1ng/uL for digested tmm, 41.1ng/uL for digested pSEVA351 and 28.6ng/uL digested pSB1C3.

The amounts of vector and insert were calculated thanks to NEBiocalculator with a insert:vector ratio of 2:1

tmm+pSEVA351tmm+pSB1C3
NF Water14.5uL12.5uL
10X T4 Buffer2uL2uL
T4 ligase1uL1uL
tmm0.5uL1.5uL
Vector2uL3uL

The tubes were incubated at 22°C for 1H and overnight at 16°C.


August 21st

E.coli competent cells (NEB turbo) were transformed with tmm+pSEVA351 and tmm+pSB1C3 ligation products using the Heat Shock transformation protocol. On August 22nd we got 4 colonies of NEB transformed with tmm+pSB1C3.

August 25th

A colony PCR was done with 2 different colonies but the result was not convincing.

August 27th

Miniprep and digestion were done using liquid culture of the 2 colonies.

colony 1colony 2
NF Water14.5uL12.5uL
10X FD Buffer2uL2uL
XbaI1uL1uL
SpeI1uL1uL
DNA15uL11uL
Fast AP2uL2uL
TOTAL40uL40uL

On the gel we can see a band at 1.5kb for colony 1 but not for colony 2. The cloning seems to have worked.

September

September 1st

tmm also has to be cloned using pSEVA351 so that we can transform into C.striatum.

E.coli was transformed using tmm+pSEVA351 ligation product from August 18th with electroporation. It did not work on the first time.

September 3rd

A new ligation of tmm and pSEVA351 was done:

NF Water13.5uL
10X T4 Buffer2uL
T4 ligase1uL
tmm1uL
pSEVA3512.5uL

The tube was incubated 1H at 22°C and overnight at 4°C.

September 4th

A new electroporation was done with the same protocol.Some colonies developped. Two of them were transfered in LB+Chlormaphenicol and two glycerol stocks were made with the strains called sPB.054 and sPB.055. Analytical digestion was performed on these strains: miniprep and digestion using XbaI and SpeI. The gel showed nothing corresponding to tmm.

September 25th

The cloning was tried again from the beginning. 2 new pairs of primers were designed: 1 pair (oPB.087 and oPB.088) corresponding to pSB1C3 cloning including XbaI and PstI restriction sites and 1 pair (oPB.089 and oPB.090) corresponding to pSEVA315 cloning including XbaI and HindIII restriction sites. The gBlock was amplified using the first pair (PCR1) and the second pair (PCR2) of primers. The DNA template is tmm gBlock diluted 1:50.

ReagentVolume
1X4X
5X Phusion HF Buffer20uL80uL
10mM dNTPs2uL8uL
Forward primer1uL4uL
Reverse primer1uL4uL
DNA1uL4uL
DMSO3uL12uL
Phusion polymerase1uL4uL
Nuclease Free Water71uL284uL

We used this thermocycle:

TemperatureTime
Start98°C30s
Cycle x3598°C10s
Cycle x3552°C30s
Cycle x3572°C40s
Finish72°C5min
Blind10°C-

On the gel the bands look perfect. After purification, the concentration is 80ng/uL.

September 26th

The PCR products were digested:

1 - oPB.087 and oPB.088

Digest with XbaI, PstI. Product is 80 ng/ul.

ReagentVolume
Nuclease free water135uL
10X Fast Digest Buffer20uL
PCR product30uL
FastDigest XbaI10uL
FastDigest PstI10uL
TOTAL200uL

The tubes were incubated at 37°C for 1H. After purification, the concentration was 26ng/uL.


2 - oPB.089 and oPB.090

Digest with XbaI, HindIII. Product is 80 ng/ul.

ReagentVolume
Nuclease free water135uL
10X Fast Digest Buffer20uL
PCR product30uL
FastDigest XbaI10uL
FastDigest HindIII10uL
TOTAL200uL

The tubes were incubated at 37°C for 1H. After purification, the concentration was 33ng/uL.


Digestion of pSEVA315

ReagentVolume
Nuclease free water155uL
10X Fast Digest Buffer20uL
Plasmid15uL
FastDigest XbaI5uL
FastDigest HindIII5uL
FastAP5uL
TOTAL200uL

The tubes were incubated at 37°C for 1H. After purification, the concentration was 38ng/uL.


September 29th

Ligation and transformation

Volume
Insert (XbaI, PstI) 26ng/uL3uL
Digested pSB1C3 (XbaI, PstI) 6.5ng/uL12uL
T4 Ligase1uL
T4 Ligase Buffer2uL
NF Water2uL
TOTAL20uL
Volume
Insert (XbaI, HindIII) 33ng/uL2uL
Digested pSEVA315 (XbaI, HindIII) 38ng/uL2uL
T4 Ligase1uL
T4 Ligase Buffer2uL
NF Water13uL
TOTAL20uL

The transformation was performed according to the Heat Shock transformation protocol.

After 24h, we observed many colonies, including some dark ones which could be due to indigo produced by TMM. These dark colonies were transfered in order to miniprep them and do an analytical digestion.

October

October 1st

After miniprep, the plasmids were digested.

ReagentVolume
Nuclease free water13uL
10X Fast Digest Buffer2uL
Plasmid3uL
FastDigest XbaI1uL
FastDigest PstI or HindIII1uL
TOTAL20uL

On the gel, we can see bands at 1.5kb corresponding to tmm (tmm+pSB1C3 on the left and tmm+pSEVA315 on the right). The cloning worked.

Glycerol stocks were prepared with these strains called sPB.091 (pSB1C3) and sPB.092 (pSEVA315).

October 8th

TMM activity was found in E.coli pSB1C3-TMM (tmm+) but not in E.coli pSB1C3 (tmm-). TMM does not only degrade trimethylamine into trimethylamine-N-oxide, but also converts indole into indigo. To measure the activity of TMM, the growth medium was supplemented with tryptophan, a precursor of indole, which is the substrate of TMM. After 14h of culture, cells were pelleted, washed with water twice, and then resuspended in DMSO and sonicated. TMM activity was determined by measuring the absorbance spectrum of bacterial extractions. Peaks at 620 nm were found in tmm+ cultures supplemented with tryptophan, which was identified as indigo according absorbance spectrum analysis.

Details: we made a overnight preculture of 2 strains (sPB.026: control and sPB.091: pSB1C3+tmm) in LB+Cm. Then, the cells were resuspended and diluted in 3 tubes of each to get a OD600 of 0.2 (beginning of the exponential phase). The resuspension solution was LB or LB supplemented with tryptophane (2g/L): 3 tubes +tmm +TRP, 3 tubes -tmm +TRP, 3 tubes +tmm -TRP and 3 tubes -tmm -TRP. After 14h of culture at 37°C, the cells were washed twice (centrifugation 4000g 10min and resuspension in 10mL of water) and resuspended in 1mL DMSO. After having sonicated the cells, the solution was centrifuged (4000g 10min) and the supernatant was transfered into cuvettes to measure the absorbance spectrum. The results are in this file .

October 9th

A dilution scale of TMA was prepared to determine what is the lowest concentration people can smell in order to know which concentration we have to use in the olfactory experiment. Concentrations from 1M to 1uM were prepared with serial dilutions. 10 people were asked to smell the tubes from the lowest concentration and to stop when they smell fish odor. The results show that most of people smell trimethylamine from to a concentration of 1mM.

October 9th

GC/MS analysis were performed in the chemistry lab of Paris-Diderot University. We prepared overnight precultures of TMM-expressing E. coli and E. coli expressing empty pSB1C3. After having diluted them in LB to get an OD600 of 0.2, we added 1mM of TMA and incubated the tubes for 36H at 37°C. Then we brought the tubes for the analysis and got these figures.

October 15th

C.striatum was transformed with pSVEA351 containing tmm gene. according to this protocol. 70mL LB medium were supplemented with 7mL of 50% glucose solution. After 2h of recovery, the cells were plated on LB supplemented with chloramphenicol plates (one with 20uL and one with 200uL). Another plating was done the day after (20uL and 200uL).

Text


Centre for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI)
Faculty of Medicine Cochin Port-Royal, South wing, 2nd floor
Paris Descartes University
24, rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques
75014 Paris, France
+33 1 44 41 25 22/25
paris-bettencourt-igem@googlegroups.com
Copyright (c) 2014 igem.org. All rights reserved.