Team:Marburg:Project:Notebook:September

From 2014.igem.org

Revision as of 18:54, 16 October 2014 by RomanM89 (Talk | contribs)

Notebook: September

<a name="01.09.2014">01.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp">

<legend><a name="exp_20">Sequencing results of constructs from 29.08.2014</a></legend>
Premix Label-Nr. Construct Result
1 AGB0023512 PCR Fragment StrepDARPidin I fine
2 AGB0023513 PCR Fragment StrepDARPidin II fine
3 AGB0023514 PCR Fragment D2-StrepII fine
4 AGB0023515 PCR Fragment StrepDARPidin I fine
5 AGB0023516 PCR Fragment StrepDARPidin II fine
6 AGB0023517 PCR Fragment D2-StrepII fine
   </fieldset>
   
   <fieldset class="exp18">
      <legend><a name="exp18.65">18.65 Test digest of prepped clones from 18.63</a></legend>

Aim: Checking insertion of StrepDARPidin into pet16b

The prepped plasmids from the positive clones were cut with Nco/ Xho in order to see if the 900 bp were flipping out of the pet16b backbone.

Mastermix (µL) Mix per samle (µL)
Pet16b-Insert (ca. 50-80 ng/ µL) - 8
Cutsmart 10x 10 -
NcoI 0.5 -
XhoI 0.5 -
Water 9 -
Mastermix - 2
Total 20 10
     
                 

Incubation at 37°C for 40 min.

                 <img src="MR_2014-09-01_18.65.png" width="30%" />

The gel showed that all picked clones were positive. Clone 17 was sent was sequencing and transformed into E.ColiBL21(DE3).

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp">

<legend><a name="exp_21">Sequencing results of constructs from 01.09.2014</a></legend>
Premix Label-Nr. Construct Primer
1 AGB0023518 piGEM-027 I1 (pMAD-D2-Strep) Flo96 D2_3 fw
2 AGB0023519 piGEM-027 I3 (pMAD-D2-Strep) Flo96 D2_3 fw
3 AGB0023520 piGEM-027 I6 (pMAD-D2-Strep) Flo96 D2_3 fw
4 AGB0023521 piGEM-027 II2 (pMAD-D2-Strep) Flo96 D2_3 rv
5 AGB0023551 piGEM-028 clone 7 T7
6 AGB0023552 piGEM-028 clone 7 T7 term
  </fieldset>
   <fieldset class="exp18">
      <legend><a name="exp18.66">18.66 Expression-Test with transformed E.Coli BL21 (DE3)</a></legend>

Aim: Checking the overexpression of pet24d-StrepDARPidin

In order to check the expression of the StrepDARPidin a colony containing piGEM-028 (pet16b-StrepDARPidin) was used to inoculate 20 mL of LB-Amp. The culture incubated at 37°C until an OD of 0,7.

A ca. 1 mL preinduction probe (PI) was taken (0,7 (favoured OD) : 0,7 (actual OD) = 1 mL). After that the cultures were induced with 20 µL IPTG for 3h.

An induction probe (I) was taken (320 µL with an OD of 2,2; 350 µL with an OD of 2).

PI and I were centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 1 min, the supernatant was discarded and the pellet resuspended in 60 µL water and 40 µL SDS-Buffer.

The four probes were analysed on an SDS-PAGE gel with 10 µL volume per probe.

<img src="MR_2014-09-01_18.66.png" width="40%" />

The gel showed a positive overexpression of a protein at ca. 30 kDa which fits the calculated molecular mass.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp22">

   <legend><a name="exp22.5">22.5 Repeated amplification of killswitch module 2 and flanks</a></legend>

Aim: cleaner amplification of KSII, since there always were many unspecific bands and the expected band was very weak. The same went for the flanks.

Mix amyEFlankI amyEFlankII lacAFlankI lacAFlankII amyE-yvydFlankII KSII
Template (Δ51 facgDNA 1:10) 2 2 2 2 2 -
Template (gBlock DNA KSII) - - - - - 0.5
Primer iGEM-34 1 - - - - -
Primer iGEM-35 1 - - - - -
Primer iGEM-36 - 1 - - - -
Primer iGEM-37 - 1 - - - -
Primer iGEM-40 - - 1 - - -
Primer iGEM-41 - - 1 - - -
Primer iGEM-42 - - - 1 - -
Primer iGEM-43 - - - 1 - -
Primer iGEM-48 - - - - 1 -
Primer iGEM-37 - - - - 1 -
Primer iGEM-44 - - - - - 1
Primer iGEM-45 - - - - - 1
dNTPs 1 1 1 1 1 1
5x HF-buffer 10 10 10 10 10 10
Phusion polymerase 1 1 1 1 1 1
Water 34 34 34 34 34 34
Total  (µl) 50 50 50 50 50 50


<img src="MR_2014-09-01_22.5.png" width="70%"/>

The amplification of KSII did not work: some unspecific bands were visible but not of the expected size. The amplification of flank 1 amyEfw, flank 3 lacAfw and flank 4 lacA rev was successful but yielded in a low amount of PCR product. The primers and templates for amplifying KSII, amyE rev and AmyE/yvyD were given to Florian Altegoer and were amplified by him: KSII did not work either but the flanks.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp13">

   <legend><a name="exp13.79">13.79 Transformation of Bacillus subtilis PY79 with the Nose-plasmids</a></legend>

: insertion of the Nose-plasmids into B. subtilis in order to test the promoters.

The plasmids of 13.78 were prepped at the weekend. Frozen and competent B. subtilis cells were thawed without ice. 15 µl of each plasmid were given to the cells that were incubated at 37°C for 0.5 hours. After regeneration the cells were plated on LB-Cm plates (5 ng/µl) and were incubated at 30°C for several days.

</fieldset>


<a name="02.09.2014">02.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp"> <legend><a name="exp_22"></a>Sequencing Results of constructs from 01.09.2014</legend>

Premix Label-Nr. Construct Result
1 AGB0023518 piGEM-027 I1 (pMAD-D2-Strep) fine
2 AGB0023519 piGEM-027 I3 (pMAD-D2-Strep) fine
3 AGB0023520 piGEM-027 I6 (pMAD-D2-Strep) fine
4 AGB0023521 piGEM-027 II2 (pMAD-D2-Strep) fine
5 AGB0023551 piGEM-028 clone 7 fine
6 AGB0023552 piGEM-028 clone 7 fine

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp22"> <legend><a name="exp22.6">22.6 </a>Repeated fusion-PCR of the Killswitch module I with the flanks amyE I/II</legend>

Aim: Fuse the amyE flanks to killswitch module I.


Content KSI (µl)
Template: KSI (ca 5 ng/µl) 1
AmyE flank I (5 ng/µl) 1
AmyE flank II (ca. 5 ng/µl) 1
Primer iGEM034 (1:40) 1
Primer piGEM037 (1:40) 1
HF Buffer 5x 10
Phusion 1
dNTPs 1
Water 33
Total 50


Fusion PCR Step Temperature °C Time
1 98 5 min
2 98 20 sec
3 60 20 sec
4 72 2 min
5 Go To 2 35x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite

The bands were at a height of ca 1500 bp which is too small for the expected fragment of 1847 bp. For this reason, Florian tried the Fusion PCR as well but failed too.

<img src="MR_2014-09-02_22.6.png" width="30%" />

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp22"> <legend><a name="exp22.7">22.7 </a>Gibson Assembly of KS module I with the flanks amyE I/II</legend>

Aim: Fuse the amyE flanks to killswitch module I.

Component Gibson with vector (µL) Gibson without vector (µl) Control (µl)
pMAD 2 - 2
KS module I (ca. 5 ng/µl) 1 1 -
Flank amyE I (ca. 5 ng/µl) 1 1 -
Flank amyE II (ca. 5 ng/µl) 1 2 -
H2O - 1 3
Gibson mix 15 15 15
Total 20 20 20

The attempts were incubated at 50°C for an hour and transformed into E. Coli XL1-Blue, plated out on LB-Amp. An additional reaction was started without pMAD in a lower(1 µl) and a higher (2 µl) amount of amyE flank I. These reactions were used to do a PCR reaction with the primers piGEM034 and piGEM037 to test if the assembled fragment is present in the reaction. The expected bands should have a size of 1847 bp but the fragment visible is only ca 1300 bp big. It seems like the flank I is missing but then the fragment should not have been amplified, since the primers were chosen to include both flanks.

<img src="MR_2014-09-02_22.7.png" width="30%" />

</fieldset>

<a name="03.09.2014">03.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp22"> <legend><a name="exp22.8">22.8 Repeated amplification of KSI and flank I</a></legend>

Aim: amplification KSI and flank I to have correct fragments for Gibson / Fusion PCR

Since the Gibson assembly of the single parts without the vector (22.7) and the Fusion PCR yielded no positive results, the KSI should be amplified once again to assure usage of the correct and pure fragments for the FusionPCR or Gibson assembly.



Component KS module I Flank I
Template (Δ51 facgDNA 1:10) - 2
Template (gBlock DNA 1:10) 1 -
Primer iGEM-38 (1:50) 2.5 -
Primer iGEM-39 (1:50) 2.5 -
Primer iGEM-34 (1:50) - 2.5
Primer iGEM-35 (1:50) - 2.5
5x HF-Buffer 10  10
dNTPs (40 mM) 1 1
Phusion polymerase 1 1
Water 32 31
Total 50 50


PCR Step Temperature °C Time
1 98 5 min
2 98 20 sec
3 58.2, 61.3, 63.5 20 sec
4 72 50 sec
5 Go To 2 34x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite


 <img src="MR_2014-09-03_22.8.png" width="30%" />


The gel showed the expected band for the killswitch module 1 but only one band for flank 1 in the reaction with the annealing temperature of 58°C. The remaining reactions for KSI were pooled and purified with a Gel Ex kit. Since the only band for the flank 1 is visible at 58°C and not above another PCR was prepared with lower annealing temperatures but the same reaction mix as above.

PCR Step Temperature °C Time
1 98 5 min
2 98 20 sec
3 58.2, 61.3, 63.5 20 sec
4 72 50 sec
5 Go To 2 34x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp13">

   <legend><a name="exp13.80">13.80 repeated transformation of B. subtilis PY79 and E. coli DH5α with the Nose-plasmids</a></legend>

Aim: insertion of the Nose-plasmids into B. subtilis in order to test the promoters and into E. coli for multiplication of the plasmids

All plasmids (from positive clones 13.78) were again used to transform B. subtilis PY79, since the former plates seemed to be contaminated by other organisms. E. coli DH5α was transformed with the rest of the plasmids to multiply it for later purposes.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp22">

   <legend><a name="exp22.9">22.9 colony PCR of clones of the Gibson assembly with KSI and flanksI and II</a></legend>

Aim: check for positive clones

Three colonies were grown on the plate with the Gibson assembly transformed XLIBlue cells. The control also contained three colonies. However, the colonies of the Gibson plate were tested by colony PCR with the primer surrounding the flanks of the connected KSI module, since no primer were available which target regions in the vector pMAD.

Mix colony PCR Master mix for 4 reactions (µl) Single reaction
Template - small part of colony
Primer iGEM034 (1:50) 4 1
Primer iGEM037 (1:50) 4 1
5x HF-Buffer 16 16
dNTPs (40 mM) 2 0.5
Phusion DNA polymerase 1:10 2 0.5
Water 52 13
Total 80 20


colony PCR Step Temperature °C Time (min/sec) KSI
1 98 5 min
2 98 20 sec
3 55 20 sec
4 72 1:20 min
5 Go To 2 34x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite


 <img src="MR_2014-09-03_22.9.png" width="40%" />

</fieldset>


<a name="04.09.2014">04.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp18"> <legend><a name="exp18.67">18.67 StrepDARPidin expression in E.Coli BL21 (DE3)</a></legend>

Aim: Preculture for upcoming purification

3 L LB medium were prepared with 1 mL ampicillin each and inoculated with some clones from the Bl21 transformation plate. The cultures were induced with 50 ml lactose solution (12,5g/ 50 mL) each and incubated at 30°C overnight.

In order to check the expression of the StrepDARPidin a colony containing piGEM-028 (pet16b-StrepDARPidin) was used to inoculate 20 mL of LB-Amp.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp20"> <legend><a name="exp20.10">22.10 Gradient fusion PCR to amplify KSI with flanks</a></legend>

Aim: fuse killswitch module I and flanks I amyEfw and II amyE rev together

The fragments were all amplified and purified. This time a gradient was performed with an initial step of 50°C for 0.5 hours (similar to a Gibson assembly), since Florian tried it before and yielded better results than without the initial 50°C step.

Mix fusion/gibson PCR Master mix for 10 reactions (µl) Single reaction (µl)
Killswitch module I (ca. 10 ng/µl) 10 1
Flank I amyE for 10 1
Flank II amyE rev 10 1
Primer iGEM034 (1:50) 62.5 6.25
Primer iGEM037 (1:50) 62.5 6.25
5x HF-Buffer 100 10
dNTPs (40 mM) 10 1
Phusion DNA polymerase 1:10 10 1
Water 225 22.5
Total 500 50


colony PCR Step Temperature °C Time (min/sec) KSI
1 98 5 min
2 98 20 sec
3 52-62 20 sec
4 72 2:10 min
5 Go To 2 34x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite

The bands had the expected size of ca 1800 bp.

       <img src="MR_2014-09-04_22.10.png" width="30%" />

</fieldset>


<a name="05.09.2014">05.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp18"> <legend><a name="exp18.68">18.68 StrepDARPidin expression in E.Coli BL21 (DE3) and purification</a></legend>

The 3 x 1 liter LB culture which were induced overnight with lactose were harvested and the pellets resuspended in 15 mL Buffer A. The cell suspension was cracked with the micro fluidizer. The lysate was centrifuged at 20000 rpm for 20 min and purified with a Ni-NTA Column.

The following steps were performed for the Ni-NTA Column:

  • equilibration with Buffer A 10 min
  • taking 40µL supernatant (load)+ 10 µL SDS-Buffer - L-Probe
  • 50 mL load on column
  • taking 40 µL of flow through + 10 µL SDS-buffer - FT-Probe
  • first washing with 25 ml Buffer A (half the load)
  • taking 40 µL of washing flow through + 10 µL SDS-Buffer - W-Probe
  • equilibrate with Buffer B (output pipe off the column into glas, input into B)
  • hanging pipe on column, 20 ml Evolution- E
  • taking 40 µL of Elution 1-6 + 10 µL SDS-Buffer E-probe
  • SDS-PAGE analysis

regeneration of column:

  • 10min water
  • 10min EDTA
  • 10min water
  • 10min NiSO4
  • 10min water

Meanwhile the elution was transferred in a concentrator column which was centrifuged at 4000 rpm until the volume in the filter was 1.5 mL for injection into the gel filtration station.

The gel showed that there was not the desired StrepDARPidin loaded on the column. A SDS-PAGE probe from the pellet showed us that the pellet contained the protein.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp18"> <legend><a name="exp18.69">18.69 New StrepDARPidinexpression in E.Coli BL21 (DE3) </a></legend>

We considered that the StrepDARPidin might be in inclusion bodies because of the Streptavidin part and the codon optimization. So we tried expression overnight with 0.1mM IPTG of an 100 mL culture at OD 0,7. We induced as well with lactose overnight as a control.

The 4 cultures were incubated at 20°C and 30°C in the shaker overnight.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.12">19.12 Amplification of Hag-D2-Cup/-Strep</a></legend>

Aim: amplification of the Hag-D2-Cup/ -Strep for cloning into pet24d in order to prepair crystallization.

piGEM-026 and -027 were used as a PCR template to amplify Hag-D2 constructs for cloning into pet24d in order to express the flagellin modification for crystallization. Fragments the size of ca. 1450 for Hag-D2-Cup and 1350 for Hag-D2-Strep were expected.

Mix PCR D2-Cup I (µL) PCR D2-Cup II (µL) PCR D2-Strep (µL)
piGEM-026 (1:10 - 10 ng/µL) 1 1 -
piGEM-027 (1:10- 10 ng/µL) - - 1
Flo96 D2_3 fw 1 1 1
Flo97 D2_3 rv) 1 1 1
Phusion 1 1 1
HF-Buffer 5x 10 10 10
dNTPs 1 1 1
Water 35 35 35
Total 50 50 50


PCR Step Temperature °C Time
1 98 3 min
2 98 30 sec
3 55 30 sec
4 72 90 sec
5 Go To 2 31x
6 72 4 min
7 4 infinite


<img src="MR_2014-09-05_19.12_1.png" width="30%" /> <img src="MR_2014-09-05_19.12_2.png" width="30%" />

analysis:

The PCR Probes were purified and pooled with the Omega Gel Extraction Kit due to the Ezymatic reaction purification protocol. Final concentrations:

    Hag-D2-Cup: 41 ng/ µL
    Hag-D2-Strep: 25 ng/ µL

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.13">19.13 Restriction digest of PCR Fragments Hag-D2-Constructs</a></legend>

Aim: digest with NcoI and Bam of the Hag-D2 PCR product for cloning into the expression vector pet24d Nco/ Bam cut

The PCR products from 19.12 were cut with NcoI and BamHI to get the restriction sites for cloning into pet24d Nco/BamHI cut.

Component PCR PCR D2-Cup (µL)(µL) PCR D2-Strep (µL)
Hag-D2-Cup (41 ng/µL) 30 -
Hag-D2-Strep(25 ng/µL) - 30
Cutsmart 10x 3.4 3.4
NcoI 0.25 0.25
XhoI 0.25 0.25
Water 1 1
Total 34 34

Incubation overnight at room temperature.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp22"> <legend><a name="exp22.11">22.11 Gibson assembly of pMADNcoI/BamHI with the fused KSI + flanks amyEfw and rev</a></legend>

Aim: clone the fragment into the vector pMAD for integration in Bacillus chromosome

The fragment of the fusion PCR (22.10) was separated on a 1% agarose gel, cut out and purified with a Gel Ex kit. The already cut pMAD plasmid was used to perform a Gibson assembly.

<img src="MR_2014-09-05_22.11.png" width="30%"/>

Component Gibson with vector (µL) Control (µL) (only restricted pMAD)
pMADNcoI/BamHI (47.6 ng/µL) 2.1 2.1
KS part I (88.1 ng/µL) 0.9 -
H2O 2 2.9
Gibson mix 15 15
Total 20 20

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.81">13.81 Preparation of media and strains for another B. subtilis transformation</a></legend>

Aim: Since the transformation of B. subtilis with the SPC/SPII method and the Nose-plasmids did not work the Low Salt/High Salt method should be tested.

The protocol and the strains were provided by AG Bremer of the microbiology department of the Philipps Universität Marburg. All media were prepared as possible (methods) and the strains B. subtilis 168 and B. subtilis JH642 were streaked on LB-Agar and incubated at 37°C.

</fieldset>


<a name="06.09.2014">06.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp18"> <legend><a name="exp18.70">18.70 New StrepDARPidin expression in E.Coli BL21 (DE3)</a></legend>

The cultures from the day before were spinned down at 4000 rpm for 20 min. The pellets were resuspended in 10 ml Buffer A and cracked with the micro fluidizer. The lysate was centrifuged at 20000 rpm for 20 min and purified with a Ni-NTA Beads from Qiagen according to the protocol. Probes from the pellet, supernatant and Elution wereanalysed on an SDS-PAGE gel:

<img src="MR_2014-09-06_18.70.png" width="30%"/>

The gels showed that the protein remains in the pellet no matter which attempt.

For further experiments for the isolation of the protein in inclusion bodies new expression cultures from a freshly transformed BL21(DE3) strain with piGEM-028 were used to inoculate 3 L expression culture with lactose overnight.3 L LB were prepared with 1 mL ampicillin each. The cultures were induced with 50 ml lactose solution (12,5g/ 50 mL) each and incubated at 30°C overnight.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.14">19.14 Ligation of restricted Hag-D2-Cup/ -Strep constructs with pet24d Nco/ Bamcut</a></legend>

Aim: cloning of expression vector with Hag-modifications

The Nco/ Bam restricted PCR fragments from 19.13 were ligated into precut pet24d. The 20 µL attempts were transformed into E.Coli XL1-Blue after inactivation (10min at 65°C) and selected on LB- Amp plates incubated overnight at 37°C.

Component Ligation I: pet-Hag-D2-Cup(µL) Ligation II: pet-Hag-D2-Strep (µL) Control (µL)
Nco/Bam cut Hag-D2-Cup 1 - -
Nco/Bam cut Hag-D2-Strep - 1.5 -
Pet24d Nco/Bam(6,5 ng/µL) 5 5 5
Ligation Buffer 10x 2 2 2
Ligase 1 1 1
H2O 11 10.5 12
Total 20 20 20

</fieldset>


<a name="07.09.2014">07.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.14">19.14 Ligation of restricted Hag-D2-Cup/ -Strep constructs with pet24d Nco/ Bam cut</a></legend>

Aim: cloning of expression vector with Hag-modifications.

The control plate showed no colonies in comparison the ligation plates I and II over 15 clones. 6 Clones per plate were picked for a inoculation of minipreps for a test digest next day.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp18"> <legend><a name="exp18.70">18.70 3rd StrepDARPidin expression in E.Coli BL21 (DE3)</a></legend>

Aim: Preculture for upcoming purification tests

The cultures were spinned down at 4000 rpm. The pellets were resuspended in 10 ml Buffer A and centrifuged down at 4000 rpm again. The supernatant was discarded and the pellets were frozen at -80°C.

</fieldset>


<a name="08.09.2014">08.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp18"> <legend><a name="exp18.71"></a>18.71 Purification of StrepDARPidin from inclusion bodies</legend>

Aim: Purification of StrepDARPidin from inclusion bodies.

In order to rescue the StrepDARPidin from the inclusion bodies we tried different protocols. The pellet from 07.09.2014 was warmed up and the cells were cracked with the microfluidizer after resuspension in 15 mL Buffer A (Lys(ate)).

The suspension was centrifuged at 20.000 x g for 15 min. The supernatant (S1) was discarded and the pellet (P1)resuspended in 5 mL 6M Guanidinium-HCL solution for solubilisation and unfolding of the StrepDARPidin.

After centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min the supernatant (S2) was used for refolding. The membranous pellet (P2) was thrown away.

For refolding 100 mL Buffer A were filled into a Erlenmeyer-Flask on ice with a magnet stirrer inside on 600 rpm.

For refolding it was necessary to dilute the Guanidinium-HCL dilution very fast and softly. For that purpose rapid dilution was done by pipetting the supernatant drop by drop into the vortex of the Buffer A. After adding the whole Guanidinum-HCL/ Protein solution the suspension was observed and precipitation noticed. The suspension was centrifuged at 20.000 rpm (Pellet P3). The supernatant was loaded on a Ni-NTA Column from GE-Healthcare (L). Flow through (FT), Wash (W) in Buffer A and Elution (E) in Buffer B were kept for gel analysis. The probes lysat to Load were cooked for 5 min at 95 degrees.

From every fraction 40 µL were taken for a commassie SDS-PAGE and 10 µL 10x SDS Buffer added. The pellet probes were resuspended in 60 µL water and 40 µL SDS-Buffer.

<img src="MR_2014-09-08_18.71.png" width="30%"/>

The gel showed us that the StrepDARPidin is still in the pellet fraction but we were able to make some of it soluble as it can be seen in S2 and the load. The StrepDARPidin was thought to build tetramers with ca. 120 kDa size. The complex seems to be stabil enough to be seen on the gel above the marker which fits to the size of ca. 120 kDa- Cooking up would break the tetramer.

In order to get enough protein for a gel filtration run 4 L of BL21 with piGEM-028 were induced with lactose overnight.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.15"></a>19.15 Test digest Nco/ Bam with pet24d-Hag-D2-Cup/ -Strep clones</legend>

Aim: checking insertion of Hag-D2-Cup/ -Strep

The plasmids from 6 clones per Ligation plate were prepped and ca. 350 ng DNA were digested with Nco/Bam in order to check the right insertion of the 1350-1450 bp sized inserts.

Component PCR D2-Cup (µL) Nco/ Bam Mastermix (14x)(µL)
Plasmid (60 ng/ µL) 5 -
Cutsmart 10x - 14
NcoI - 0.5
BamHI - 0.5
Water - 55
Master mix 5 -
Total 10 70

Digest at 37°C for half an hour.

   <img src="MR_2014-09-08_19.15.png" width="30%" />

Upper half of the gel shows hag-d2 cup, lower half shows hag d2-strepdarp; 1kb gene ruler ladder was used. 3 clones seem to be positive for cup, but as an mixture occurred, the cloning procedure will be repeated from the PCR step on.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.16">19.16 PCR amplification of -Hag-D2-Cup/ -Strep </a></legend>

Aim: clone the expression vectors pet24d

Template was diluted plasmid piGEM026/027

Component 1x Mix (µL) 5x Mastermix (µL)
Buffer 10 50
Water 26.5 132.5
dNTPs 1 5
Phusion 1 5
DNA (10-13 ng/µl) 1.5 1.5
Primer 54 Flo (1:50) 6.5 32.5 
Primer 56 Flo (1:50) 6.5  32.5

After the PCR the fragments were purified via gel extraction for further cloning steps. In the gel the cut vector pet24d was also purified.

Concentrations after clean up:

Pet24d= 20 ng/µl, D2-Cup= 208 ng/µl, D2-Strep= 180 ng/µl

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.17">19.17 Restriction of -Hag-D2-Cup/ -Strep </a></legend>

After the clean up the two fragments they had to be digested with NcoI and BamHI in order to clone them into the digested pet24d vecor.

Component D2-Cup (µL) D2-Strep (µL)
Water 12  12
Buffer 2 2
NcoI 0.5 0.5
BamHI 0.5 0.5
Insert 5 5

The restriction was performed for 1h at 37°C (heating block).

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.18"></a>19.18 Ligation of -Hag-D2-Cup/ -Strep into cut pet24d</legend>

After the plasmid and the two inserts have been digested, two ligations and a ligation control were performed in order to gain the final expression vectors.

Component pet24d + D2-cup (µL) pet24d + D2- Strep (µL)
Water 2
Buffer (10x) 2 2
Ligase 1 1
Vector 10 10
Insert 5 5

For the optimal ligation results the ligtion calculator of the iGEM team Dallas was used. Ligation was performed for 2h. Afterwards the ligase was inactivated at 65°C for 15 min in order to improve the ligation/transformation result.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.19">19.19 Transformation of pet24d with Hag-D2-Cup/ -Strep </a></legend>

After the ligase inactivation the whole reaction mix was transformed into E.coli XL-blue which seem to be the best cells for important transformations. Standard transformation protocol was used.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp22"> <legend><a name="exp22.12">22.12 colony PCR and restriction of isolated plasmids from Gibson assembly plate</a></legend>

Aim: test the clones for the correct pMAD-KSI construct

The Gibson assembly plate showed sixteen colonies. All colonies were picked, transferred onto a master plate and into a premixed colony PCR. The same colonieswereusedtoinoculate a miniprep.

Mixcolony PCR Master mix for 18 reactions (µL) Single reaction
Template - Small part of colony
Primer iGEM034 (1:50) 54  3
Primer iGEM037 (1:50) 54 3
5x HF-Buffer 72 4
dNTPs (40 mM) 18 1
Phusion DNA polymerase 1:10 9 0.5
Water 153 8.5
Total 360  20 


colony PCR Step Temperature °C Time
1 98 10 min
2 98 20 sec
3 55 20 sec
4 72 2:10 min
5 Go To 2 33x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite

The colony PCR was negative, even the positive control with the amplified KS part I with the flanks.

<img src="MR_2014-09-08_22.12_1.png" width="60%" />

The plasmids were prepped and digested with KpnI and SacI to test the insertion of the KS part I into pMAD. The expected sizes were 5054 bp and 6402 bp with the insert and pMAD only would yield in 4440 bp, 170 bp and 5054 bp fragments.

<img src="MR_2014-09-08_22.12_2.png" width="60%" />

The clones1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 14 showed the expected results. The rest of the isolated plasmids were discarded.

</fieldset>

<a name="09.09.2014">09.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp18"> <legend><a name="exp18.71a">18.71a Gelfiltration purification of StrepDARPidin tetramers</a></legend>

Aim: Purification of StrepDARPidin from inclusion bodies

The overnight cultures from 18.70 were harvested for 10 min at 4000 x g and the pellets were frozen away at -80°C until use.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp22"> <legend><a name="exp22.14">22.14 Start of the pMAD-transformation of B. subtilis WT3610 with pMAD-KSI</a></legend>

Aim: integrate KS part I into the amyE locus of the B. subtilis genome.

A preculture of 10 ml LB was inoculated with B. subtilis WT3610 cells and incubated at 37°C over night.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.81">13.81 Midi prep of the nose-plasmids and the piGEM002-plasmids with the killswitch promoters</a></legend>

Aim: Since no transformation of B. subtilis has worked yet, two new protocols should be tested, which require a huge amount of plasmid

The midi prep of the plasmids piGEM002 with the silver and copper promoters and the killswitch promoters was carried out according to the Qiagenmidiprep kit instructions. The prepped plasmids were tested via restriction with BamHI and SpeI.

Precultures of all four strains (JH642, PY79, 168 and WT3610) were inoculated in 3 ml HS-medium and 10 ml LB and were incubated over night at 37°C.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.20">19.20 Test digest Nco/ Bam with pet24d-Hag-D2-Cup/ -Strep clones</a></legend>

Aim: checking insertion of Hag-D2-Cup/ -Strep

After the successful ligation (colonies in both plates), 5 clones per ligation have been inoculated in LB-Kan Medium for a later Mini-prep and test restriction of the expression plasmids. Colonies with the numbers 6-10 were chosen as 1-5 did not grow over the day. 6-10 were incubated over night.

</fieldset>

<a name="10.09.2014">10.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.82"></a>13.82 Transformation of B. subtilis with the Nose-plasmids (Ag-/Cu-promoters, killswitch promoters) according to the HS/LS-protocol / Spizizen-medium protocol</legend>

Aim: transform Bacillus with the plasmids

The only preculture, which was grown in HS was the JH642. Every other strain did not grow in High Salt medium. 20 ml of prewarmed (30°C) Low Salt medium were inoculated with 1 ml of the HS culture and incubated in a shaking waterbath at 30°C with 120 rpm for 3 hours. 5 µg of the plasmids were preset in Eppendorf cups and 1 ml of the LS culture was transferred into these cups. piGEM002 was transformed as a control. These culture/plasmid mixes were incubated at 37°C shaking at 200 rpm. After 2 hours of incubation the cells were centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 1.5 minutes, most of the medium was withdrawn,the cells were resuspended in the rest of the medium and plated out on LB-Cm plates that were incubated at 37°C over night.Precultures of all strains were again inoculated, since many were not grown.

The precultures in LB medium were all grown. 10 ml Spizizens minimal medium were inoculated with an OD600 of 0.1. The cultures wre incubated at 37°C until they reached an OD of 1. 5 µg of DNA were mixed with 1 ml of the culture and incubated for further 2 hours. 200 and 500 µl of each transformation sample were plated out on separate LB-Cm plates, which were incubated at 37°C over night.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp22"> <legend><a name="exp22.14"></a>22.14 pMAD-transformation of B. subtilis WT3610 with pMAD-KSI</legend>

Aim: transformation of B. subtilis with the vector pMAD-KSI

10 ml of MNGE-medium were inoculated 1/100 with the preculture. This culture was grown at 37°C with an agitation of 200 rpm until it reached OD 1.4. 5 µg of he prepped plasmids pMAD-KSI from clone 1, 2, 10 and 11 (22.12) were used to perform four transformations. 400 µl of the cells were added to the plasmids in a test tube and were incubated at 37°C 200 rpm for 1 hour. 100 µl expression mix were added and the cells were incubated for another hour. Dilutions up to 10-6 were carried out and the 10-5 and 10-6 dilutions were plated out on LB-MLS-X-Gal plates that were incubated at 30°C for several days.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.21"></a>19.21 test digest Nco/ Bam with pet24d-Hag-D2-Cup/ -Strep clones</legend>

Aim: checking insertion of Hag-D2-Cup/ -Strep

Plasmids were extracted from the cells and a test restriction was performed with 300 ng plasmid. Gelfoto was unfortunately not saved but the bands were at the expected size (appr. 1500 bp). Therefore one plasmid each was sent for sequencing. Cup Number 6!

Component 1x Mix (µL) 11x Mastermix (µL)
Plasmid DNA
Water 14 154
CutSmart Buffer 22 
NcoI 0.5  5.5
BamHI 0.5  5.5 

</fieldset>


<a name="11.09.2014">11.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.22">19.22 Sequencing results and further cloning plans</a></legend>

Due to the sequencing results pet24d with Hag-D2-Cup is perfect (the plasmid map was compared to the sequence delivered by eurofins).

Pet24d with Hag-D2-Strep cannot be used, since the strep tag seems to be lost. Therefore this plasmid will be cloned again from the beginning in order to exclude any mistakes at any step.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.83">13.83 Repeated Transformation of B. subtilis with the Nose-plasmids (Ag-/Cu-promoters, killswitch promoters) according to the HS/LS-protocol</a></legend>

Aim: transform Bacillus with the plasmids

The plates of the former transformations did not show any colonies, so the trafo was repeated with the precultures (13.82). Again the only strain which grew in HS-medium was JH642. The procedure was carried out like before with a higher agitation (200 rpm) in the waterbath.

</fieldset>


<a name="12.09.2014">12.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.23">19.23 PCR amplification of Hag-D2-Strep</a></legend>

Materials Amount (µL)
Plasmid piGEM027 1.0
Water 24.0 
Buffer (5x) 10.0
Phusion 1.0
dNTPs 1.0
Primer Flo 54 (1:50) 6.5 
Primer Flo 56 (1:50) 6.5 

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.24">19.24 Restriction of Hag-D2-Strep</a></legend>

After the purification via gel extraction the fragments had the following concentrations:

Attempt I= 27 ng/µl Attempt II= 35 ng/µl

20 µl reactions were prepared:

Materials Attempt I (µL) Attempt II (µL)
Buffer (10x) 2.0 2.0
Water 8.0 6.0
Fragment 9.0 11.0
NcoI 0.5 0.5
BamHI 0.5 0.5

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.24">19.24 Ligation of Hag-D2-Strep into cut pet24d</a></legend>

In order to gain the complete expression vector the digested insert had to be ligated into cut pet24d. 20 yl reaction mix was prepared, correct ratio of insert to verctor was calculated with the iGEM ligation calculator.

Materials Amount (µL)
Buffer 2.0
Water 4.0
Ligase 1.0
Vector 5.0
Insert 8.0

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.25">19.25 Transformation of pet24d with Hag-D2-Strep</a></legend>

Whole ligation mix was transformed into E.coli XL-1-Blue with the standard transformation protocol.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp22"> <legend><a name="exp22.14">22.14 pMAD-transformation of B. subtilis WT3610 with pMAD-KSI</a></legend>

Aim: transformation of B. subtilis with the vector pMAD-KSI

5 ml LB-MLS were inoculated with a blue colony of the trafo plates and incubated over night at 37°C. Colonies of clone 1, 2, 10 and 11 were picked.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.26">19.26 colony PCR of transformed B. subtilis WT3610 with pMAD-D2-Strep/Cup</a></legend>

Aim: check for positive clones

The transformation of B. subtilis WT3610 with the plasmids piGEM026 and piGEM027was carried out. In order to check for positive clones a colony PCR was performed using the Hag primers.

Mixcolony PCR Single reaction
Colony in 50 µl PBS 2
Primer Flo 56 (1:50) 6.25
Primer Flo 54 (1:50) 6.25
5x HF-Buffer 4
dNTPs (40 mM) 0.5
DMSO 0.3
Phusion DNA polymerase 1:10 0.5
Water 0.2
Total 20


Fusion PCR Step Temperature °C Time
1 98 5 min
2 98 20 sec
3 55 20 sec
4 72 1:35 min
5 Go To 2 34x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite

</fieldset>


<a name="13.09.2014">13.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.26">19.26 Test restriction of pet24d with Hag-D2-Strep</a></legend>

8 Clones from the ligation plates were inoculated in 5ml LB-Kan and incubated over night. Plasmids were extracted with the quiagen kit and restricted with NcoI and BamHI in order to check if Hag-D2-strep is in pet24d.

Components 1x Mix
Plasmid 3.0
Buffer 2.0
Water 14.0
NcoI 0.5
BamHI 0.5

Every picked clone was positive so that clone 1 was sent for sequencing. The gel photo got lost unfortunately. Pet24d-Hag-D2-Strep was named piGEM-030.

       <img src="MR_2014-09-13_19.26.png" width="30%" />

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp22"> <legend><a name="exp22.14">22.14 First heatshock of pMAD-Trafo KSI</a></legend>

Aim: integration of pMAD-KSI into the Bacillus genome

4 ml of LB-MLS were inoculated with 100 µl of the precultures (in a test tube) and incubated at 30°C and 210 rpm for 2 hours before switching the temperature of the incubator to 42°C for 6 h. Dilutions up to 10-6 were made and 10-5 and 10-6 were plated out on LB-MLS-XGal plates at 42°C.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.27">19.27 repeated colony PCR of transformed B. subtilis WT3610 with pMAD-D2-Strep/Cup</a></legend>

Aim: check for positive clones

The picked clones were boiled at 100°C in 1x PBS for 10 minutes and the the cell rests were centrifuged down. The colony PCR was repeated as follows:

Mixcolony PCR Single reaction (µL)
Colony in 100 µl PBS 5
Primer Flo 56 (1:50) 6.25
Primer Flo 54 (1:50) 6.25
5x HF-Buffer 10.0
dNTPs (40 mM) 1.0
Phusion DNA polymerase 1:10 1.0
Water 20.5
Total 50


colony PCR Step Temperature °C Time (min/sec) KSI
1 98 5 min
2 98 30 sec
3 55 30 sec
4 72 1:40 min
5 Go To 2 34x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite


   <img src="MR_2014-09-13_19.26_2.png" width="30%" />

The size of the expected bands was ca 1400 bp. The negative clones with the wildtypeflagellin (ca 1 kb) were not further used. Clones D2-Strep 1, 10 and D2-Cup 1 were picked and streaked out separately on LB plates.

</fieldset>


<a name="14.09.2014">14.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp22"> <legend><a name="exp22.14">22.14 Second heatshock of pMAD-Trafo KSI</a></legend>

Aim: flip the pMAD-backbone out of the Bacillus genome

4 ml of LB were inoculated (in a test tube) with a blue colony of the plates from the first heat shock. These cultures were incubated at 30°C at 210 rpm for 6 hours and afterwards the temperature was shifted to 42°C for 3 hours. The plating was performed as usual.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.27">19.27 colony PCR on positive picked and separated Bacillus subtilis clones </a></legend>

Aim: check for more pure clones with less wt flagellin and GelEx of positive fragment for sequencing

The colony PCR was repeated as listed above (19.26) and the fragments of the right size were purified by Gel Ex.

Additionally the positive clones were used to inoculate 100 mL LB with WT3610 as a control. The cultures were raised to an OD of 0,7 and 2 mL of cultures were spinned down before dissolving them in 60 µL water and 40 µL SDS-PAGE buffer. The samples were cooked for 10 min at 95°C and analyzed on an SDS-PAGE gel with commassie stain.

<img src="MR_2014-09-14_19.27.png" width="30%" />

It is possible to see that the D2-Strep clone expresses the modified Hag-D2-Strep. The size between the WT flagellin and Florian Altegoer’s D23-Hag fits perfectly. Hag-D2-Cup seems to be not expressed by the clone. The sequencing results had to be expected.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.84">13.84 colony PCR of Bacillus subtilis 168 piGEM037</a></legend>

Aim: check for positive clones with piGEM037

The plates of the transformation with the Spizizens-medium were still stored at 37°C and none of the plates contained colonies except the plate of Bacillus subtilis 168. These clones were picked, transferred onto a new plate and into 1x PBS medium boiled at 100°C or 10 minutes.

Mixcolony PCR Single reaction
Colony in 100 µl PBS 5.0
Primer iGEM006 (1:50) 6.25
Primer iGEM063 (1:50) 6.25
5x HF-Buffer 10.0
dNTPs (40 mM) 1.0
Phusion DNA polymerase 1:10 1.0
Water 20.5
Total 50.0


colony PCR Step Temperature °C Time
1 98 5 min
2 98 30 sec
3 55 30 sec
4 72 1:40 min
5 Go To 2 34x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite


<img src="MR_2014-09-14_13.84._png.png" width="50%"/>

The expected size of the bands was ca 750 bp, the negative control was genomic DNA of the wt3610, the positive control was the isolated plasmid piGEM037.

</fieldset>


<a name="15.09.2014">15.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.85">13.85 Cloning of the new Ag/Cu-promoters and the killswitch promoters into the nose plasmids with the ssrA-tags</a></legend>

Aim: create plasmids with the promoters in front of a GFP with degradation tag

Since we tried the Bacillus trafo with the ethanol free isolated nose plasmids (without degradation tags) as well and succeeded in nearly all cases except piGEM035, all strains are there for plate reader tests. Competent cells of PY79 of Felix were again transformed with piGEM035. The new promoters should also be tested with GFP containing degradation tags. In order to do that the plasmids piGEM007, piGEM008 and piGEM009 that contain the ssrA tags behind the GFP were restricted with the restriction enzymes NcoI and SacI.

Components 1x Mix (µL)
piGEM007/8/9 (amount: ca. 2 µg) 5.0
10x Cut Smart 2.0
Water 14.0 
NcoI 0.5
SacI 0.5
Volume 20

The restriction mixes were incubated at 37°C for over 1 h, separated on an agarose gel and purified via Gel Ex.

To connect the linearized plasmids with the promoter fragments ligations and Gibson assemblies were performed similar to 13.76 and 13.77.

Ligation of piGEM007/8/9 with the killswitch promoters:

Component Ligation I(µL) Ligation II(µL) Ligation III (µL)
piGEM-007/8/9 (ca 20ng/µL) 5 5 5
iGEM-59/60 0.8 - -
iGEM-61/62 - 0.8 -
iGEM-63/64 - - 0.8
Polynucleotide kinase 0.5 0.5 0.5
T4 Ligase 1 1 1
Ligation Buffer 10x 2 2 2
Water 9.7 9.7 9.7
Total 20 20 20

The reaction was incubated at roomtemperature for over 1 hour and afterwards tansformed into XLIBlue cells which were plated out on LB-Amp plates.

Gibson assembly of linearized piGEM007/8/9 with the new silver and copper promoters:

Component Gibson Cu I (µL) GibsonAg II (µL) Control (µL)
piGEM-002 (ca 20 ng/µL) 2.5 2.5 5
Cu promoter (4.2 ng/µl) 2.5 - -
Ag promoter (2 ng/µl) - 2.5 -
Gibson mix 15 15 15
Total 20 20 20

The Gibson reaction was incubated at 50°C for 1 hour and the whole sample was transformed into XLIBlue cells that were plated out on LB-Amp.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp22"> <legend><a name="exp22.15">22.15 colony PCR of pMADtrafo wt3610 with piGEM031 (pMAD-KSI)</a></legend>

Aim: check for positive insertion of KS part I into the Bacillus genome

A colony PCR with the primers that bind to the ends of the amyE flanks was carried out but it was negative. Since it was not sure whether the primer would be able to bind the PCR was repeated with the primers surrounding the killswitch module I iGEM038 and iGEM039:

Mixcolony PCR Single reaction
Colony in 100 µl PBS 5.0
Primer iGEM006 (1:50) 6.25
Primer iGEM063 (1:50) 6.25
5x HF-Buffer 10.0
dNTPs (40 mM) 1.0
Phusion DNA polymerase 1:10 1.0
Water 20.5
Total 50.0


colony PCR Step Temperature °C Time (min/sec)KSI
1 98 5 min
2 98 30 sec
3 55 30 sec
4 72 1:40 min
5 Go To 2 34x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite


       <img src="MR_2014-09-15_22.15.png" width="60%"/>

The expected bandsize was about 360 bp, which was visible in nearly all the samples. The positive control for the PCR reaction was isolated piGEM 031 and the negative control was chromosomal DNA of the unmodified wt3610.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp18"> <legend><a name="exp18.71">18.71 Gelfiltration purification of StrepDARPidin tetramers</a></legend>

Aim: Purification of StrepDARPidin from inclusion bodies

In order to improve the rescue the StrepDARPidin from the inclusion bodies we tried an additional IB washing buffer. The pellet from last week at -80°C was warmed up and the cells were cracked with the microfluidizer after resuspension in 15 mL Buffer A (Lys(ate)).

The suspension was centrifuged at 20.000 x g for 15 min. The supernatant (S1) was discarded and the pellet (P1) resuspended in 5 mL IB Wash Buffer. Then the suspension (SS1) was centrifuged at 27.000 x g for 10 min. The resulting pellet (P2) and the supernatant (S2) were used for taking probes for SDS-PAGE. The wash was repeated. 6M Guanidinium-HCL solution for solubilisation and unfolding of the StrepDARPidin was added.

After centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min the supernatantwas used for refolding. The membranous pellet (P3) was thrown away.

For refolding 100 mL Buffer A were filled into a Erlenmeyer-Flask on ice with a magnet stirrer inside on 600 rpm.

For refolding it was necessary to dilute the Guanidinium-HCL dilution very fast and softly. For that purpose rapid dilution was done by pipetting the supernatant drop by drop into the vortex of the Buffer A. After adding the whole Guanidinum-HCL/ Protein solution the suspension was observed and precipitation noticed. The suspension was centrifuged at 20.000 rpm (Pellet P4) . The supernatant was loaded on a Ni-NTA Column from GE-Healthcare (L). Flow through (FT), Wash (20 mL W) in Buffer A and Elution (15 mL) (E) in Buffer B were kept for gel analysis. The probes lysat to Load were cooked for 5 min at 95 degrees.

From every fraction 40 µL were taken for a commassie SDS-PAGE and 10 µL 10x SDS Buffer added. The pellet probes were resuspended in 60 µL water and 40 µL SDS-Buffer.

<img src="MR_2014-09-15_18.71.png" width="40%"/>

The gel shows that the monomeric and tetramericStrepDARPidin can be found in Load, Flow through and elution. The forming of the tetramer tells us that the refolding had to be successful partially. The elution was concentrated with an Amicon to an endvolume of 1,5mL. 75 µL glycerol were added and the concentrate was frozen away in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for further use.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp"> <legend><a name="exp_23"></a>Sequencing of constructs from 15.09.2014</legend>

Sequencing of plasmid piGEM030 and PCR products of B.subtilis colony PCR for insertion of D2-Cup and D2-Strep into Flagellin.

Label-Nr. Construct Primers
AGB000k-583 piGEM-030 T7
AGB000k-584 piGEM-030 T7 term
AGB000k-585 Hag-D2-Strep Flo96 Hag-D2-fw
AGB000k-586 Hag-D2-Strep Flo97 Hag-D2-rv
AGB000k-587 Hag-D2-Cup Flo96 Hag-D2-fw
AGB000k-588 Hag-D2-Cup Flo97 Hag-D2-rv

</fieldset>


<a name="16.09.2014">16.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp18"> <legend><a name="exp18.71a">18.71a Gelfiltration purification of StrepDARPidin tetramers</a></legend>

Aim: Purification of StrepDARPidin from inclusion bodies

The stored protein concentrate was thawn up on ice and injected into the injection valve of the ÄtkaPurifier which was buffered with PBS+ 2,5% glycerin. A S200 SepharoseColumn was used for the gel filtration run.

       <img src="MR_2014-09-16_18.71a.png" width="50%"/>

40 µL of the Fraction C6. C10, C11(Peak) and D12 were picked for SDS-PAGE analysis. 10 µL SDS-Buffer were added and 20 µL loaded on the gel. Additionally the rest was cooked up and the same amount loaded onto the gel.

<img src="MR_2014-09-16_18.71a_2.png" width="50%"/>

The gel shows us that the whole peak contains the tetramericStrepDARPidin. After cooking it up the tetramer dissolves into the monomeric StrepDARPidin.

The fractions covering the peak were concentrated with an amicon to an endvolume of 500 µL. 25 µL glycerin were added and the protein aliquoded in 60 µL aliquods.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.28">19.28 Purification of Hag-D2-Strep</a></legend>

Aim: Purification of Hag-D2-Strep for analytical gel filtration was already purified StrepDARPidin

piGEM-029 and piGEM-030 were transformed together with FliS into E. Coli BL21 (DE3) and plated out on LB-Amp/Can plates for overnight incubation at 37°C.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.86">13.86 Cloning of the Nose plasmids with the ssrA- degradation tags</a></legend>

Aim: create plasmids with the promoters in front of a GFP with degradation tag

The following entries of the nose plasmids will care all about the cloning, which involves creating the plasmid by Gibson/ligation checking by colony PCR, transformation of E. coli DH5α and Bacillus subtilis PY79 with the plasmids. Not every step of transformation will be mentioned, since they all were carried out according to the standard protocols. After each plasmid was checked by colony PCR and/or control restriction DH5α and Bacillus were transformed with it. DH5α were transformed with the plasmids piGEM034, 035, 036 and 037.

</fieldset>


<a name="17.09.2014">17.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp"> <legend><a name="exp_24">Sequencing results of constructs from 15.09.2014</a></legend>

Label-Nr. Construct results
AGB000k-583 piGEM-030 fine
AGB000k-584 piGEM-030 fine
AGB000k-585 Hag-D2-Strep fine
AGB000k-586 Hag-D2-Strep fine
AGB000k-587 Hag-D2-Cup fine
AGB000k-588 Hag-D2-Cup fine

The sequencing told us that Both Hag-D2-Strep & -Cup are perfectly integrated into the chromosome of the mutants. Hag-D2-Cup seems not to be expressed. Anyways a swarming assay was planned.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.28">19.28 Purification of Hag-D2-Strep</a></legend>

Aim: Purification of Hag-D2-Strep for analytical gel filtration was already purified StrepDARPidin

An overnight expression culture from piGEM-030/FliS was made by inoculating 2 x 1L LB-Amp/Can with clones from the transformation plates and inducing with 50 mL 25% lactose solution overnight at 30°C at 150 rpm.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp21"> <legend><a name="exp21.3">21.3 Swarming AssayHag-D2-Strep & -Cup</a></legend>

Aim: Check motility of Bacillus mutants Hag-D2-Cup & -Strep

Overnight cultures were inoculated of 5 mL LB in test tubes from WT3610 , Hag-D2-Cup & -Strep strains. Incubation was done at 37°C overnight.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.87">13.87 Making Bacillus competent for transformation</a></legend>

Aim: making competent PY 79 cells for the transformation with the new nose-plasmids

The Bacillus subtilis PY79 cells were made competent according to the protocol using SPC and SPII medium. As a test the cells were transformed with piGEM038, which was transformed before.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.88">13.88 Screening for positive clones containing the new Nose-plasmids</a></legend>

Aim: colony PCR to check colonies for the correct plasmids

Mix colony PCR Cu-promoter Ag-promoter
Template Part of a colony Part of a colony Part of a colony Part of a colony Part of a colony
iGEM006 (1:50) 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25
iGEM055 (1:50) 6.25 - - - -
iGEM057 (1:50) - 6.25 - - -
iGEM059 (1:50) - - 6.25 - -
iGEM061 (1:50) - - - 6.25 -
iGEM063 (1:50) - - - - 6.25
dNTPs (10 mM each) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
5x HF-buffer 4 4 4 4 4
Phusion polymerase 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Water 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Total 20 20 20 20 20
   
colony PCR Step Temperature °C Time (min/sec)KSI
1 98 10 min
2 98 30 sec
3 55 30 sec
4 72 1 min
5 Go To 2 34x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite


       <img src="MR_2014-09-17_13.88.png" width="30%" />


       <img src="MR_2014-09-17_13.88_2.png" width="30%" />


       <img src="MR_2014-09-17_13.88_3.png" width="30%" />


       <img src="MR_2014-09-17_13.88_4.png" width="30%" />


<img src="MR_2014-09-17_13.88_5.png" width="30%" />
<img src="MR_2014-09-17_13.88_6.png" width="30%" />


The size of the expected band was depending on the promoter between 700 and 850 bp. As a positive control cells containing the piGEM002 vector with the different promoters were used. The clones that seemed positive were given in culture for a miniprep. More clones were picked from the plates to test them via colony PCR (same reaction as above).

</fieldset>



<a name="18.09.2014">18.09.2014 </a>

<fieldset class="exp21"> <legend><a name="exp21.3a"></a>21.3a Swarming Assay Hag-D2-Strep & -Cup</legend>

Aim: Check motility of Bacillus mutants Hag-D2-Cup & -Strep

The OD of the overnight cultures was measured and was ca. OD 5. 100 µL of culture were centrifuged and the pellet resuspended in 50 µL medium to get an OD of 10.

10 µL of the cultures was dropped on Swimming and Swarming plates (0,3% and 0,7% LB Agar plates) and incubated at 37°C.

The cellular diffusion was observed after 30-60 min and the distanced measured starting from the cell circle after letting the drop dry.

Inubation Time (min)

WT3610 Distance (mm)

Hag-D2-Strep Distance (mm)

Hag-D2-Cup Distance (mm)

Swim

Swarm

Swim

Swarm

Swim

Swarm

30

-

-

- -

-

-

60

-

-

- -

-

-
90 - 0.5 - - - -
120 0.5 1 0.4 0.5 - -
150 4.5 2 1 1.5 - -
180 12 4 4 9 - -
210 23 10 12 13 - -
240 31 16 18 17 - -
270 38 29 23 26 - -
300 38 36 29 30 - -
330 38 38 34 32    
      38 38 - -

The measurements showed that Hag-D2-Strep is able to swim and swarm. In comparison to the wild type the strain is slower in swarming and swimming. Hag-D2-Strep did not swarm or swim as the commassie gel showing no flagellin suggested before. Electronmicroscopy and alternatives for Hag-D2-Strep were planned.

For reproduction of the results new precultures of Hag-D2-Strep & -Cup were inoculated and incubated at 30°C.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.28">19.28 Purification of Hag-D2-Strep</a></legend>

Aim: Purification of Hag-D2-Strep for analytical gel filtration was already purified StrepDARPidin

The cultures from yesterday were harvested at 4000 rpm at 4 °C and the pellets were resuspended in 10 mL Buffer A for microfluidizing. The lysat was centrifuged at 20000 rpm so that the clear lysat could be loaded on a 1 mL Ni-NTA column. Preinduction probe (PI), induction probe (I), Load (L), flow through (FT), wash (W) and elution with 15 mL Buffer B (E) were analysed on a SDS-PAGE gel commassie stained:

<img src="MR_2014-09-18_19.28_.png" width="30%" />

Meanwhile the elution was concentrated with an amicon at 4000 rpm until an endvolume of 1 mL. The ÄKTApurifier was buffered with GeFi Buffer and the concentrate was injected. Presets: 4 mL fraction size, 0,65 mPa pressure alarm, fractioning after 90 mL run, endvolme 400 mL. A Superdex S200 column was used.

FT and W contained much protein. The 1 mL Ni-NTA had not enough capacity to bind all the protein.

<img src="MR_2014-09-18_19.28_2.png" width="30%" />

The Ni-NTA column seemed to be contaminated with left StrepDARPidin on the NI-NTA columns from previous use. We made the GeFi run to see if we culd purifier the proteins anyways.

<img src="MR_2014-09-18_19.28_3.png" width="30%" />

The fractions building the peak were analyzed on a SDS-Gel to cover the peak. Then the fractions from were concentrated with an amicon to an endvolume of 500 µL. Aliquods of 50 µL were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="13.89">13.89 Control restriction of the plasmids with SpeI and BamHI and control PCR</a></legend>

Aim: Aim: check isolated plasmids for correct insertion of the promoter sequences

To be sure that the promoter sequences were inserted correctly the isolated plasmids were restricted with the enzymes SpeI and BamHI. The difference between the negative and positive clones should be very few but be detectable on the gel: positive: 3426 and ca 3500 bp; negative: 3426 and 3276 bp.

Mix restriction Single reaction (µl)
Plasmid 6.0
CutSmart 10x 2.0
SpeI 1.0
BamHI 1.0
Water 10.0
Total 20.0

The restriction reaction was incubated at 37°C for over one hour and analyzed with an agarose gel.

<img src="MR_2014-09-18_13.89.png" width="30%" />

Although the colony PCR for most of the plasmids was like expected, some plasmids were not restricted at all. The bands around 3000 bp are double bands of the two fragments. A difference between negative and positive plasmids could not be discovered since the amount of DNA was too high and the bands were not separated well enough. It was striking that every unrestricted plasmid was a plasmid with the piGEM007 backbone (strong degradation tag). For a better check a control PCR was performed with the 007-plasmids as template:

Mix colony PCR Single reaction
Plamid (2 ng/µl) 2.5
Primer iGEM006 (1:50) 6.25
Primer fw 55/57/59/61 or 63 (1:50) 6.25
5x HF-Buffer 10.0
dNTPs (40 mM) 1.0
Phusion DNA polymerase 1:10 1.0
Water 24.5
Total 50.0
       
colony PCR Step Temperature °C Time (min/sec)KSI
1 98 5 min
2 98 30 sec
3 55 30 sec
4 72 1:00 min
5 Go To 2 34x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite


   <img src="MR_2014-09-18_13.89_2.png" width="30%" />

According to the control PCR on the plasmids the plasmids were ok and the promoters were inserted correctly. The copper sensitive promoter is slightly bigger than the used lac or constitutive promoters, which can be seen very well on the gel. The plasmids were assumed to be correct and were ready for further using (trafo of Bacillus and DH5alpha). However, a further Gibson assembly and ligation reaction (according to 13.85) was carried out with all promoters and plasmids that were negative (piGEM007 + Cu + Ag; 008 + Cu; 009 + Ag + Cu; 007 + const + tetO + lac; 008 + const; 009 + tetO + lac).

</fieldset>


<a name="19.09.2014">19.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp25"> <legend><a name="exp25.2">25.2 Preparation of LLCs and A549</a></legend>

Aim: Preparation of LLCs for assays

Lewis Lung cell Carcinoma Cell line and A549 Adenocarcinoma cell line were kindly provided by Dr. Jürgen Adamkiewicz and Margitta Alt (ZTI Marburg) and splitted by Dr. Alexander Visekruna 1:3 in the BMFZ (AG Steinhoff Lab) at 37°C in DMEM + 10% FCS and L-Glutamine. The cells were cultivated by Dr. Visekruna and Maik Luu for further use.

</fieldset>

<a name="19.09.2014">19.09.2014 </a>

<fieldset class="exp22"> <legend><a name="exp22.2">22.2 Preparation of LLCs and A549</a></legend>

Aim: Preparation of LLCs for assays

Lewis Lung cell Carcinoma Cell line and A549 Adenocarcinoma cell line were kindly provided by Dr. Jürgen Adamkiewicz and Margitta Alt (ZTI Marburg) and splitted by Dr. Alexander Visekruna 1:3 in the BMFZ (AG Steinhoff Lab) at 37°C in DMEM + 10% FCS and L-Glutamine. The cells were cultivated by Dr. Visekruna and Maik Luu for further use.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp21"> <legend><a name="exp21.4">21.3b Swarming Assay Hag-D2-Strep & -Cup</a></legend>

Aim: Check motility of Bacillus mutants Hag-D2-Cup & -Strep

The OD of the overnight cultures was measured and was ca. OD 5. 100 µL of culture were centrifuged and the pellet resuspended in 50 µL medium to get an OD of 10.

10 µL of the cultures were spotted on Swimming and Swarming plates (0,3% and 0,7% LB Agar plates) and incubated at 37°C.

The cellular diffusion was observed after 30-60 min and the distanced measured starting from the cell circle after letting the drop dry.

Inubation Time (min)

WT3610 Distance (mm)

Hag-D2-Strep Distance (mm)

Hag-D2-Cup Distance (mm)

Swim

Swarm

Swim

Swarm

Swim

Swarm

30

-

-

- -

-

-

60

-

-

- -

-

-
90 4 6 - 6 - -
120 11 8 5 8 - -
150 20 16 6 12 - -
180 32 19 18 20 - -
210 36 32 26 26 - -
240 36 32 18 34 - -
270 36 36 34 36 - -
300 36 36 36 36 - -
330 38 38 34 32    

The Hag-D2-Strep strain swarms and swims slower than the WT but is motile in comparison to the Hag-D2-Cup strain.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.90"> 13.90 Control restriction of nose plasmids</a></legend>

Aim: check isolated plasmids for correct insertion of the promoter sequences

Plasmids were prepped from cultures inoculated yesterday. These plasmids were again restricted with BamHi and SpeI to check for the insertion of the promoters.

Mix restriction Single reaction (µl)
Plasmid 2.0
CutSmart 10x 2.0
SpeI 1.0
BamHI 1.0
Water 14.0
Total 20.0

The reactions were incubated at 37°C for over 1 hour.

<img src="MR_2014-09-19_13.90.png" width="30%" />

All bands were in the expected height of ca 3400bp. The plasmids were used further for transformation of DH5α and Bacillus.

</fieldset>

<a name="20.09.2014">20.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.90a">13.90a Screening for positive clones containing the new Nose-plasmids</a></legend>

Aim: colony PCR to check colonies for the correct plasmids

The clones on the plates of the new ligation and transformation were screened for positive constructs by colony PCR.

Mix colony PCR Single reaction
Template part of a colony
Primer iGEM006 (1:50) 3.125
Primer fw 55/57/59/61 or 63 (1:50) 3.125
5x HF-Buffer 4.0
dNTP mix (10 mM each) 1.0
Phusion DNA polymerase 1:10 0.5
Water 8.75
Total 20.0
       
colony PCR Step Temperature °C Time (min/sec)KSI
1 98 10 min
2 98 30 sec
3 55 30 sec
4 72 1:00 min
5 Go To 2 34x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite


   <img src="MR_2014-09-20_13.90a_1.png" width="30%" />


<img src="MR_2014-09-20_13.90a_2.png" width="30%" />

As a positive control XLIBlue containing piGEM034 or piGEM035 were used, the negative control was an untransformed XLIBlue. None of the picked clones was positive for the lac and constitutive promoters + tetO. Some clones containing the plasmids piGEM009 + Ag promoter and piGEM009 + Cu promoter were positive. These positive clones were picked and used to inoculate a miniprep culture.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp21"> <legend><a name="exp21.4">21.4 Analytical gel filtration</a></legend>

Aim: Checking interactions between Hag-D2-Strep and StrepDARPidin

In order to check the interaction between the Strep-Tag in the D2-Flagellin and the Streptavidin in our StrepDARPidin we used an analytical Superdex S200 column. Probes from both proteins were injected into the ÄTKAPurifier and a separate run each done in order to see when the protein gets through the column.

In case of an interaction the complex of both proteins would come off early from the column because of its size. The column was buffered with PBS+2,5% glycerin.

Size and ratio were calculated with http://web.expasy.org/protparam/ and http://christoph-leidig.de/tprot.html for injecting adequate amounts of both proteins.

StrepDARPidin:

Absorption at 280 nm 5.025
Extinction coefficient ε [l/mol*cm)] 57410
Cuvette length [cm] 1
Molecular weight [g/mol] 31809
Protein concentration [µM] 88.57341926493642
Protein concentration [mg/ml] 2.8174318933983624

Hag-D2-Strep/FliS

Absorption at 280 nm 7.015
Extinction coefficient ε [l/mol*cm)] 130786.5
Cuvette length [cm] 1
Molecular weight [g/mol] 130786.5
Protein concentration [µM] 122.19125587876675
Protein concentration [mg/ml] 15.980966686988328

88.57/ 122,19 = 0,7248

(1-0,7248)* 50 µL (StrepDARPidin) =13,76 µL(Hag-D2-Strep)

Analytical run StrepDARPidin 50 µL + 50 µL PBS+2,5% glycerin:

    	    <img src="MR_2014-09-20_21.4_1.png" width="30%" />

Analytical run Hag-D2-Strep/ FliS 13,7 µL+ 86,3 µL PBS+2,5% glycerin:

<img src="MR_2014-09-20_21.4_2.png" width="30%" />

13,7 µL Hag-D2-Strep/FliS & 50 µL StrepDARPidin + 36,3 µL PBS+2,5% glycerin incubated together for 1h at room temperature:

<img src="MR_2014-09-20_21.4_3.png" width="30%" />

The peaks showed no shift to the front and ran into each other. They seemed to show no interaction. In order to be sure we tried to make a pulldown with Strep-Beads.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp21"> <legend><a name="exp21.5">21.5 Strep-Bead pulldown</a></legend>

Aim: Checking interactions between Hag-D2-Strep and StrepDARPidin

Strep-Beads from Novagene were used to check the interactions between the Strep-Tag in our Flagellin with the StrepDARPidin and the Strep-Beads themselves.

Theoretically the flagellin should bind to the beads and should be found in the elution in contrast to the StrepDARPidin which should be washed off.

In the third elution there should be less Flagellin or even nothing in case of an interaction with the StrepDARPidin because of the competitive situation. The flagellin should bind totally to the StrepDARPidin and for that reason not/ less to the beads.

3 columns were prepaired and filled with 500 µL GeFi Buffer. 20µL Strep-Beads were added and the columns were spinned down at 4000 rpm for 1 min. Then another 500 µL GeFi buffer was added.

The first (1) probe of 3 µL Hag-D2-Strep was pipetted into the buffer. 20 µL StrepDARPidin were added to column 2. Column 3 was used for loading a mixture of 20 µL StrepDARPidin and 3 µL Flagellin onto the column. The three columns were spinned for 20 min at room temperature in a spinning wheel. After that the columns were washed twice with 500 µL GeFi buffer. For eluting 40 µL Elution Buffer from Novagene (with Desthiobiotin) was used to resuspend the beads. After centrifugation at 13000 rpm the elution was mixed with 10 µL SDS-Loading buffer and analyzed on a SDS-PAGE gel with commassie stain.

As a control 40 µL of a 1:10 dilution of the flagellin concentrate was used on the gel. Unfortunately there was not enough StrepDARPidin left for a second control.

Gel-Analysis:

<img src="MR_2014-09-20_21.5.png" width="30%" />

The gel shows that a very tiny amount of the flagellin binds to the Strep-Beads (line 1). The StrepDARPidin does not (line 2). Surprisingly the mixture shows both proteins in the elution (line 3). Unfortunately this cannot be seen on the scanned picture . The control (line 4) shows us that the flagellin purification was not pure enough and the flagellin concentrate was contaminated with StrepDARPidin from the Ni-NTA purification.

The Strep-Beads might have been not efficient working enough because of their age and usage. The binding of the flagellin might tell us that the Strep-Tag is able to interact with the Streptavidin.

In order to get a better and reliable result we decided to purify the flagellin and the StrepDARPidin newly and repeat the pulldown.

New expression cultures of 1L volume each were induced with lactose and incubated overnight at 30°C and 150 rpm.

</fieldset>


<a name="21.09.2014">21.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.91">13.91 Ligation of piGEM007 and piGEM009 with the const. + tetO promoter</a></legend>

Aim: insert the constitutive promoter with the tetO into the nose plasmids

The ligation was carried out like in 13.85. The reaction was incubated at room temperature for over one hour and E. coli XLIBlue were transformed with the whole reaction mix.

</fieldset>


<a name="22.09.2014 ">22.09.2014 </a>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.29">19.29 new Purification of Hag-D2-Strep</a></legend>

Aim: Purification of Hag-D2-Strep for analytical gel filtration was already purified StrepDARPidin

The cultures from yesterday were harvested at 4000 rpm at 4 °C and the pellets were resuspended in 10 mL Buffer A for microfluidizing. The lysat was centrifuged at 20000 rpm so that the clear lysat (Load/L) could be loaded on a 5 mL Ni-NTA column. Load (L), flow through (FT), wash (W) and elution with 15 mL Buffer B (E) were analysed on a SDS-PAGE gel commassie stained:

<img src="MR_2014-09-22_19.29.png" width="30%" />

FT and W contain much protein. The 1 mL Ni-NTA had not enough capacity to bind all the protein.

Meanwhile the elution was concentrated with an amicon at 4000 rpm until an endvolume of 1 mL. The ÄKTAPrime was buffered with GeFi Buffer and the concentrate was injected. Presets: 4 mL fraction size, 0,65 mPa pressure alarm, fractioning after 90 mL run, endvolme 400 mL. A Superdex S200 column was used.

The Ni-NTA column seemed to be not contaminated with StrepDARPidin. So the last contamination came form the left StrepDARPidin on the NI-NTA columns from previous use.

Unfortunately the S200 column seemed to be very dirty so that it was not possible to separate the proteins properly.

<img src="MR_2014-09-22_19.29_2.png" width="30%" />

The fractions were collected and concentrated again. After that the concentrate was injected into ÄktaPrime again with a different S200 (“Olga”) with the same settings as before. The run was done overnight.

Additionally new expression cultures with E. Coli BL21(DE3) containing piGEM-030 were induced with lactose for a new purification run.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.92">13.92 Colony PCR to check the ligation of piGEM0077 and piGEM009 with the const. + tetO promoter</a></legend>

Aim: check the transformands for the correct plasmid

Mix colony PCR Single reaction
Template part of a colony
Primer iGEM006 (1:50) 6.25
Primer iGEM063 (1:50) 6.25
5x HF-Buffer 10.0
dNTP mix (10 mM each) 0.7
Phusion DNA polymerase 1:10 1.0
Water 25.8
Total 50.0
       
colony PCR Step Temperature °C Time (min/sec)KSI
1 98 10 min
2 98 30 sec
3 55 30 sec
4 72 1:00 min
5 Go To 2 34x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite


<img src="MR_2014-09-22_13.92_.png" width="60%" />

E. coli XLIBlue piGEM037 (oo2 + tetO) was used as a positive control. Clones 2 and 3 of piGEM007 + tetO were positive and cultures for a miniprep were inoculated with these clones.

</fieldset>


<a name="23.09.2014">23.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.29a">19.29a new Purification of Hag-D2-Strep</a></legend>

Aim: Purification of Hag-D2-Strep for analytical gel filtration was already purified StrepDARPidin

The fractions building the peak were analyzed on a SDS-Gel to cover the peak.

<img src="MR_2014-09-23_19.29a_1.png" width="30%" />

The gel sowed degradation of our protein. For crystallization it is not adequate enough. A new purification with the expression cultures from yesterday was started.

The cultures from yesterday were harvested at 4000 rpm at 4 °C and the pellets were resuspended in 10 mL Buffer A for microfluidizing. The lysat was centrifuged at 20000 rpm so that the clear lysat (Load/L) could be loaded on a 5 mL Ni-NTA column. Load (L), flow through (FT), wash (W) and elution with 15 mL Buffer B (E) were analysed on a SDS-PAGE gel commassie stained:

<img src="MR_2014-09-23_19.29a_2.png" width="30%" />

The gel showed no contamination with StrepDARPidin as well.

The elution was concentrated with an amicon at 4000 rpm until an endvolume of 1,5 mL. The ÄKTAPrime was buffered with GeFi Buffer and the concentrate was injected. Presets:

4 mL fraction size, 0,65 mPa pressure alarm, fractioning after 90 mL run, endvolme 400 mL. A Superdex S200 column (OLGA) was used.

<img src="MR_2014-09-23_19.29a_3.png" width="30%" />

The fractions building the peak were analyzed on a SDS-Gel to cover the peak which looked fine.

<img src="MR_2014-09-23_19.29a_4.png" width="30%" />

Then the fractions were concentrated with an amicon to an endvolume of 300 µL. The new robot for setting drops was used for crystallization. Cores I-III were set in full concentration (A280=25) and half concentration diluted with GeFi-Buffer. Left hag-d2-Strep was aliquoted in 50 µL and stored at -80°C.

2 L expression culture were made for new purification attempts and incubated overnight at 30°C after lactose induction.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.93">13.93 Gibson assembly with piGEM008 and the Cu promoter and piGEM007/009 with the Ag promoter</a></legend>

Aim: insert the Ag and Cu promoter into the Nose plasmids

Since some plasmids with the silver and copper sensitive promoters were still missing a new Gibson assembly was carried out with the

Component Gibson I (µL) Gibson II (µL) Gibson III (µl) Control (µL)
piGEM-007/008/009 (ca 40 ng/µL) 4 2.5 1 2.5
Cu/Ag promoter (ca 4 ng/µl) 1 2.5 4 -
H2O - - - 2.5
Gibson mix 15 15 15 15
Total 20 20 20 20

Nine reactions were carried out: piGEM 008 + Cu, piGEM009 + Ag and piGEM007 + Ag in three different variations in DNA concentration. The reactions were kept on room temperature for 30 seconds and incubated at 50°C for one hour. Afterwards the whole reaction mix was used to transform E. coli XLIBlue, which were incubated over night at 37°C.

</fieldset>


<a name="24.09.2014">24.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp18"> <legend><a name="exp18.72">18.72 Gelfiltration purification of StrepDARPidin tetramers</a></legend>

Aim: Purification of StrepDARPidin from inclusion bodies

10 L expression culture were inoculated with clones from a BL21(DE3) transformation plate and induced with lactose overnight at 30°C.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.30">19.30 Purification of Hag-D2-Strep for crystallization</a></legend>

Aim: Purification of Hag-D2-Strep for analytical gel filtration was already purified StrepDARPidin

The cultures from yesterday were harvested at 4000 rpm at 4 ° and the pellet was frozen in liquid nitrogen for storage at -80°C for further use.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.93">13.93 Screening of transformands of Gibson assembly of piGEM008/009 and the Cu promoter and piGEM007 with the Ag promoter</a></legend>

Aim: check the transformands for the correct plasmid

A colony PCR was carried out to screen the transformands for the correct plasmids. No transformands could be detected on the plate with piGEM008 + Cu.

Mix colony PCR Single reaction
Template part of a colony
Primer iGEM006 (1:10) 1
Primer iGEM063 (1:10) 1
5x HF-Buffer 4
dNTP mix (10 mM each) 0.5
Phusion DNA polymerase 1:10 1
Water 12.5
Total 20


colony PCR Step Temperature °C Time (min/sec)KSI
1 98 10 min
2 98 30 sec
3 55 30 sec
4 72 1:00 min
5 Go To 2 34x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite


  <img src="MR_2014-09-24_13.93_.png" width="30%" />

As a positive control E. coli XLIBlue piGEM034 (02 + Ag) was used. Clone 4 was positive. A LB culture was inoculated with clone 4 for a miniprep. It was grown shaking at 37°C over night.

It was noticed that the IPTG inducible Gram positive (described as lac) promoter, the strong constitutive for gram positive promoter and the tetO including variant were designed falsely. Only a part (30 bp) of the sequence was taken and cloned. That means that all nose plasmids containing the lac, const. and const. + tetO promoters were disposed. Only the plasmids with the metal ion sensitive promoters were used further.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.94">13.94 Production of competent Bacillus subtilis PY79 cells with test transformation</a></legend>

Aim: Making PY 79 competent to take up foreign DNA

Since the last PY79 cells were not competent a new try of producing competent cells was carried out according to the protocol in the methods section using SPC and SPII medium. After making the cells competent they were stored in a -80°C freezer without shock freezing in liquid nitrogen. Felix’ protocol does not including shock freezing of the cells. For a test transformation four aliquots of cells were thawed on room temperature and 100 µl each were transferred into sterile test tubes and mixed with 7 µl of the plasmids piGEM034, piGEM035, piGEM044 and piGEM050. The test tubes were incubated shaking at 37°C for 0.5 hours. The whole transformation samples were plated out on LB-chloramphenicol (5 µg/ml) plates and were incubated at 30°C for several days.

</fieldset>

<a name="25.09.2014">25.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp18"> <legend><a name="exp18.72">18.72 Gelfiltration purification of StrepDARPidin tetramers</a></legend>

Aim: Purification of StrepDARPidin from inclusion bodies

The cells from yesterday were harvested and cracked with the microfluidizer after resuspension in 40 mL Buffer A (Lys(ate)).

The suspension was centrifuged at 20.000 x g for 15 min. The supernatant (S1) was discarded and the pellet (P1) resuspended in 5 mL IB Wash Buffer. Then the suspension (SS1) was centrifuged at 27.000 x g for 10 min. The resulting pellet (P2) and the supernatant (S2) were used for taking probes for SDS-PAGE. The wash was repeated. 10 mL 6M Guanidinium-HCL solution for solubilisation and unfolding of the StrepDARPidin was added and the pellet resuspended. The suspension was incubated at room temperature permanently stirring with a magnet.

After centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min the supernatant was used for refolding. The membranous pellet (P3) was thrown away.

For refolding 5 mL of the Guanidinium-HCL 100 mL Buffer A were filled into a Erlenmeyer-Flask on ice with a magnet stirrer inside on 600 rpm. The other 5 mL Guanidinium-HCL/ Pellet resuspension was stored in the fridge until further use.

For refolding it was necessary to dilute the Guanidinium-HCL dilution very fast and softly. For that purpose rapid dilution was done by pipetting the supernatant drop by drop into the vortex of the Buffer A. After adding the whole Guanidinum-HCL/ Protein solution the suspension was observed and precipitation noticed. The suspension was centrifuged at 20.000 rpm (Pellet P4) . The supernatant was loaded on a Ni-NTA Column from GE-Healthcare (L). Flow through (FT), Wash (20 mL W) in Buffer A and Elution (15 mL) (E) in Buffer B were kept for gel analysis. The probes lysat to Load were cooked for 5 min at 95 degrees.

From every fraction 40 µL were taken for a commassie SDS-PAGE and 10 µL 10x SDS Buffer added. The pellet probes were resuspended in 60 µL water and 40 µL SDS-Buffer.

<img src="MR_2014-09-25_18.72_.png" width="30%" />

The gel shows that the monomeric and tetrameric StrepDARPidin can be found in Load, Flow through and elution. The forming of the tetramer tells us that the refolding had to be successful partially. The elution was concentrated with an Amicon to an endvolume of 1,5 mL. 75 µL glycerol were added and the concentrate was frozen away in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for further use.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.95">13.95 restriction of piGEM007/008 and 009 with NcoI and SacI</a></legend>

Aim: linearize the plasmids to for further cloning of the promoters

The plasmids with the ssrA-degradation tags were restricted with NcoI and SacI to linearize them for further cloning of promoters in front of the GFP. Different concentrations of plasmid were restricted with the enzymes to test the capacity of the restriction enzymes and to be sure that all plasmid was cut.

Component Concentration I (µL) Concentration II (µL) Concentration III (µL)
piGEM-007/008/009 (ca 400 ng/µL) 2 5 7
NcoI 1 1 1
SacI 1 1 1
Cutsmart Buffer 10x 2 2 2
Water 14 11 9
Total 20 20 20

The reaction was incubated at 37°C for over one hour and afterwards separated on a gel. As a control the unrestricted piGEM008 was used.

       <img src="MR_2014-09-25_13.95.png" width="30%" />

No difference between the unrestricted and the restricted plasmids could be detected, but a small band directly under the thick, visible one. The linearized plasmids should have a size of 6711 bp. It is possible that the unrestricted plasmids do rarely form supercoiled structures and mostly behave like the linear form, only a small part of it is supercoiled. Since the same plasmids were restricted before with the same enzymes and looked the same on the gel but were linear (further cloning of promoter sequences otherwise not possible), the plasmids were assumed to be linearized. The three concentrations of each plasmid were pooled and were purified with an Omega Gel Ex kit.

</fieldset>


<a name="26.09.2014">26.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp18"> <legend><a name="exp18.71">18.71 Gelfiltration purification of StrepDARPidin tetramers</a></legend>

Aim: Purification of StrepDARPidin from inclusion bodies

The stored protein concentrate was thawn up on ice and injected into the injection valve of the ÄktaPrime which was buffered with PBS+ 2,5% glycerin. A S200 Sepharose Column was used for the gel filtration run.

<img src="MR_2014-09-26_18.71_1.png" width="30%" />

40 µL of the Fraction 31. 37, 38 and 44 were picked for SDS-PAGE analysis. 10 µL SDS-Buffer were added and 20 µL loaded on the gel. Additionally the rest was cooked up and the same amount loaded onto the gel.

       <img src="MR_2014-09-26_18.71_2.png" width="30%" />

The gel shows us that the whole peak contains the tetrameric StrepDARPidin. After cooking it up the tetramer dissolves into the monomeric StrepDARPidin.

The fractions covering the peak were concentrated with an amicon to an endvolume of 500 µL. 25 µL glycerin were added and the protein aliquoded in 60 µL aliquods with an Absorption of 8 A280 nm.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.96"></a>13.96 Gibson Assembly of piGEM007 +Ag promoter and piGEM008/009 with Cu promoter</legend>

Aim: insert the promoter in the nose plasmids

A new Gibson assembly was carried out to insert the missing promoters into the different nose plasmids. Every combination (007 + Ag, 008 + Cu, 009 + Cu) was carried out in different relations of vector to insert:

Component equal amounts (µL) condition II for 07 + Ag (µL) condition II for 08 + Cu (µL) condition II for 09 + Cu (µL)
piGEM-007/008/009 (ca 40 ng/µL) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Cu/Ag promoter (ca 5 ng/µl) 2.5 1.2 1.4 0.95
H2O - 1.3 1.1  1.55
Gibson mix 15 15 15 15
Total 20 20 20 20

The reactions were kept on room temperature for 0.5 min and were incubated at 50°C for 1 h. Afterwards E. coli XLIBlue were transformed with the whole reaction mix, plated on LB-ampicillin and incubated over night at 37°C.

The existent nose plasmids (piGEM034/035/039/044/050) were previously transformed into DH5α cells, which were plated out new to inoculate cryo stocks of the cells.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.97">13.97 Transformation of Bacillus subtilis PY79 cel</a>ls</legend>

Aim: comparison of competence of PY79 cells

To compare the competence of our PY79 cells with cells that are competent for sure, one aliquot of competent PY79 were borrowed from Felix together with three LB-chloramphenicol plates. The 300 µl aliquot was divided into 100 µl portions. One negative control was mixed with 10 µl water, the other two 100 µl portions were treated with 5 µl and 10 µl piGEM034 (ca 400 ng/µl), which has been shown that it could be transformed. The cell/DNA mixture was incubated in a test tube, shaking for 30 minutes before plating them out on the mentioned medium plates. This time the plates were incubated at 37°C.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp22"> <legend><a name="exp22.16">22.16 amplification of KSII in single modules</a></legend>

Aim: amplification of KSII

KSII could not be amplified with the nesting primers which cover the whole KSII module, even with a variety of modified reaction conditions. Thus, primers were ordered to amplify the modules (holing, tetR, rplE (L5)) separately.

Component holin (µL) tetR (µL) L5 (µL)
KSII gBlock DNA (1:10) 1 1 1
Primer iGEM065 (1:50) 6.25 - -
Primer iGEM069 (1:50) - 1 -
Primer iGEM067 (1:50) - 1 -
Primer iGEM068 (1:50) - - 1
Primer iGEM066 (1:50) - - 1
Primer iGEM070 (1:50) - - 1
HF Buffer 5x 10 10 10
Phusion 1 1 1
dNTPs 0.5 0.5 0.5
Water 25 25 25
Total 50 50 50

colony PCR Step Temperature °C Time (min/sec)KSI
1 98 5 min
2 98 30 sec
3 55 30 sec
4 72 1:00 min
5 Go To 2 34x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite
       
<img src="MR_2014-09-26_22.16.png" width="30%" />

The sizes of the expected fragments were: holin: ca 700 bp, tetR: 684 bp and L5: 540 bp. The fragments of the expected size could be seen, it meets the eye that the unspecific bands that appeared in previous amplifications of KSII with the nesting primers were visible as well in the lane of tetR. However, tetR also showed an amplificate with the correct size.

Although the KSII parts were amplified successfully no further work will be done with KSII, because of the false promoter in front of these genes. Like mentioned before the IPTG inducible promoter for Gram positives and the strong constitutive promoter for Gram positives used in the killswitch and nose and taken from the iGEM registry were falsely designed. Only a short part of the real sequence was used.

For this reason the promoters were designed again correctly: the lac promoter (BBa_K090501; 107 bp) will be ordered in single stranded oligonucleotides from which one contains overhangs like it was restricted with NcoI and SacI. These oligos will be annealed and phosphorylated. A ligation with the nose plasmids and KSI follows. It was only enough time left to build KSI anew and not the other killswitch modules. The primer to connect the new lac promoter with the rest of KSI also introduces a RBS.

The constitutive promoter (BBa_K090504) will be amplified from gDNA of Bacillus cereus, which was kindly provided by members of the Zentralinstitut für Ernährungs- und Lebensmittelforschung ZIEL, Technische Universität München. The amplificate will be used for ligation with the nose plasmids.

</fieldset>


<a name="27.09.2014">27.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp18.73">18.73 Gelfiltration purification of StrepDARPidin tetramers</a></legend>

Aim: Purification of StrepDARPidin from inclusion bodies

The left 5 mL Gua-suspension in the fridge were refolded with the same protocol from 18.72.

<img src="MR_2014-09-27_18.73.png" width="30%" />

P1 shows a very weak line at the expected size which comes from picking just a membranous part on top of of the pellet. The line would have been more prominent if we had taken more of the pellet itself. The gel shows that the monomeric and tetrameric StrepDARPidin can be found in Load, Flow through and elution. The forming of the tetramer tells us that the refolding had to be successful partially. The elution was concentrated with an Amicon to an endvolume of 1,5 mL. 75 µL glycerol were added and the concentrate was frozen away in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for further use.

</fieldset>


<a name="28.09.2014">28.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp18"> <legend><a name="exp13.71">18.71 Gelfiltration purification of StrepDARPidin tetramers</a></legend>

Aim: Purification of StrepDARPidin from inclusion bodies

The stored protein concentrate was thawn up on ice and injected into the injection valve of the ÄktaPrime which was buffered with PBS+ 2,5% glycerin. A S200 Sepharose Column was used for the gel filtration run.

   <img src="MR_2014-09-28_18.71a_1.png" width="30%" />

40 µL of the Fraction 32. 38, 39 and 45 were picked for SDS-PAGE analysis. 10 µL SDS-Buffer were added and 20 µL loaded on the gel. Additionally the rest was cooked up and the same amount loaded onto the gel.

   <img src="MR_2014-09-28_18.71a_2.png" width="30%" />

The gel shows us that the whole peak contains the tetrameric StrepDARPidin. After cooking it up the tetramer dissolves into the monomeric StrepDARPidin.

The fractions covering the peak were concentrated with an amicon to an endvolume of 500 µL. 25 µL glycerin were added and the protein aliquoded in 60 µL aliquods with an Absorption of 7 A280 nm.

</fieldset>


<a name="29.09.2014">29.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp25"> <legend><a name="exp25.3">25.3 Preparation of LLCs</a></legend>

Aim: Preparation of LLCs for assays

We decided to cultivate the LLCs for Fluorometer assays in 12-Well plates. The medium of the 25 mL culture flask was used to resuspend the cells carefully because of their sparsely adherent trait.

The cells were transferred into a 50 mL the culture was spinned down at 1500 rpm for 5 min at 4°C.

The supernatant was discarded and resuspended in 10 mL DMEM. The cells were counted with a Neubauer-chamber.

10 µL of the cell suspension was mixed with 200 µL Trypan blue and 85-100 cells were counted in the grids of the chamber.

Calculation:

90 (cells total in grid) / 4 (number of quadrants) *20 (dilution factor) * 10000 (Neubauer factor) * 10 mL (volume of suspension)= ca. 40 mio. Cells/ 10 mL

We calculated with 50 mio. Cells in total.

The suspension was filled up to 50 mL to get 1 mio cells/ mL. 2 mL/ well were pipetted into each well of the 12-well plate and incubated overnight at 37°C.

A Black Fluotrac600 96-well plate was kindly received from the immunology. Row H 1-12 was coated with 100000 cells/ well overnight at 37°C.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.98">13.98 Screening of the transformands from the Gibson by colony PCR</a></legend>

Aim: check the transformands for the correct plasmid

A colony PCR was carried out to screen the transformands for the correct plasmids. No transformands could be detected on the plate with piGEM008 + Cu.

Mix colony PCR Single reaction
Template part of a colony
Primer iGEM006 (1:10) 1
Primer iGEM057 (1:10) 1
5x HF-Buffer 4
dNTP mix (10 mM each) 0.5
Phusion DNA polymerase 1:10 1
Water 12.5
Total (µL) 20


PCR Step Temperature °C Time (min/sec)KSI
1 98 10 min
2 98 30 sec
3 55 30 sec
4 72 1:00 min
5 Go To 2 34x
6 72 5 min
7 4 infinite


   <img src="MR_2014-09-29_13.98.png" width="30%" />

As a positive control E. coli XLIBlue piGEM034 and piGEM035 were used. No positive clones could be seen. Indeed there was a band at the right size of clone 2 07 + Ag but there was a bigger and a smaller band as well.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.99">13.99 Competent Bacillus subtilis PY79</a></legend>

The transformation of Felix’ cells with the plasmid piGEM034 worked only in case of the higher concentration. Two colonies could be observed. Since Felix had no further competent cells, his components for the SPC and SPII medium were borrowed. Instead of glucose, fructose was used by him. For making of new competent PY79 cells the cells were plated out again on a new LB plate and were incubated at 37°C over night.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.100">13.100 Restriction of piGEM007/008/009</a></legend>

Aim: linearization of the plasmids and test of the restriction enzymes

The yield of transformands after ligations or Gibson assemblies with the plasmids piGEM007, piGEM008 and piGEm009 was erratically fewer than with the piGEM002, which was restricted a few weeks ago. Since the only difference between these plasmids are the ssrA-degradation tags on the gfp-gene, there should be no difference in their restriction behavior. This is aggravated by the fact that all four plasmids contain the restriction sites for NcoI and SacI on the same positions. For this reason the plasmids were restricted again, together with test plasmids to check the activity of the enzymes NcoI and SacI. The test plasmids were pMAD that contains two SacI sites, thus resulting in fragments of 4431 bp and 5235 bp size and piGEM002, restricted by NcoI and EcoRI yielding in fragments of 476 bp and 6190 bp.

Component Restriction of 07/08/09 (µL) Test I (µL) Test I (µL)
piGEM-007/008/009 (200 - 300 ng/µL) 10 - -
piGEM002 (ca 400 ng/µl) - 2 -
pMAD (114 ng/µl) - - 2
NcoI 1 1 -
SacI 1 - 1
EcoRI - 1 -
CutSmart Buffer 10x 2 2 2
Water 14 14 15
Total 20 20 20

The reactions were incubated at 37°C for over one hour.

   <img src="MR_2014-09-29_13.100.png" width="30%" />

According to the bands NcoI was functional, the expected bands could be seen after the restriction of piGEM002. However, the functionality of SacI was not fully determined since there was no control with the unrestricted plasmid. A band in the height between 5000 and 6000 bp could be seen, another very slight band at ca 4 kb could also be noticed, what seems to be the other expected fragment. Yet it the bigger band was more intense than the smaller one. The restricted plasmids piGEM007, 008 and 009 were in had the correct size and seemed to be restricted. These bands were pooled and purified via a Gel Ex kit.

</fieldset>


<a name="30.09.2014">30.09.2014</a>

<fieldset class="exp18"> <legend><a name="exp18.72">18.72 Isolation of flagella from Hag-D2-Strep</a></legend>

Aim: Isolation of filaments for assays with StrepDARPidin

The strain Hag-D2-Strep was given to Florian Altegoer who tried to isolate the flagella according to the protocol from “Purification and Thermal Stability of Intact Bacillus subtilis Flagella”.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp25"> <legend><a name="exp25.3a">25.3a Preparation of LLCs and A549</a></legend>

Aim: Preparation of LLCs and A549 for assays

Because of the literature we found we decided to throw the LLCs for now into the waste. We did not find enough information about the EpCAM expression in that cell line.

Instead we prepared the A549 for a Fluophor-Assay tomorrow. The 25 mL flask was splitted 1:3. The medium of the culture flask was discarded from the side opposite to the adherent cells and washed with 1X PBS from the opposite site as well.

The PBS was aspirated with a glass pipette until the supernatant was clear. After adding 4 mL 1x trypsin from the opposite of the adherent cells the flask was incubated for 5 min at 37°C depending on how fast the cells come off from the ground. Under the microscope the free floating cells were checked.

The cells were transferred into a 15 mL falcon and rinsed with 10 mL DMEM to collect all remaining cells in the flask. The 15 mL falcon was filled with DMEM and the culture spinned down at 1500 rpm for 5 min at 4°C.

The supernatant was discarded and resuspended in 5 mL DMEM.

10 µL of the cell suspension was mixed with 200 µL Trypan blue and ca. 140 cells were counted in the grids of the chamber.

Calculation:

140 (cells total in grid) / 4 (number of quadrants) *20 (dilution factor) * 10000 (Neubauer factor) * 5 mL (volume of suspension)= ca. 35 mio. Cells/ 10 mL

The cells were splitted. 2 mL :1 mL : 1 mL of cell suspension was filled into 3 new 15 mL flasks and filled up with 10 mL DMEM+10%FCS and L-Glutamin. The 2mL flask was planned for microscopy on Friday with the StrepDARPidin constructs. The other flasks are for backups and assays. Incubation was performed at 37°C.

Additionally row H1-12 of the Fluotrac600 was coated with 25 µL cell suspension and 100 µL DMEM +10%FCS+L-Glut. (incubation at 37°C).

As a backup Row F of a 6x8 was filled with 25 µL cell suspension as well and 300 µL DMEM +10%FCS+L-Glut. (incubation at 37°C).

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp19"> <legend><a name="exp19.30">19.30 Purification of Hag-D2-Strep for crystallization</a></legend>

Aim: Purification of Hag-D2-Strep for crystallization

The pellets from 23.09.14 were resuspended in 10 mL Buffer A for microfluidizing. The lysat was centrifuged at 20000 rpm so that the clear lysat could be loaded on a 5 mL Ni-NTA column. Load (L), flow through (FT), wash (W) and elution with 15 mL Buffer B (E) were analysed on a SDS-PAGE gel commassie stained:

<img src="MR_2014-09-30_19.30.png" width="30%" />

Further purification was done. Meanwhile the elution was concentrated with an amicon at 4000 rpm until an endvolume of 1 mL. The ÄKTApurifier was buffered with GeFi Buffer and the concentrate was injected. Presets: 4 mL fraction size, 0,65 mPa pressure alarm, fractioning after 90 mL run, endvolume 400 mL. A Superdex S200 column was used.

Then the fractions building the peak were concentrated with an amicon to an endvolume of 500 µL which were used for setting dropes with core I and IV (QIAGEN cores). Aliquods of left flagellin of 50 µL were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C.

</fieldset> <fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.100a">13.100a Competent Bacillus subtilis PY79</a></legend>

Aim: making PY79 cells competent

The SPC medium and the SPII medium were assembled with Felix’ ingredients. The media were prewarmed before the cells were transferred into the media. New LB-chloramphenicol plates were made. After making the cells competent their competence was tested by transformation of piGEM034.

</fieldset>

<fieldset class="exp13"> <legend><a name="exp13.101">13.101 Restriction of piGEM007/008/009</a></legend>

Aim: linearization of the plasmids and test of the restriction enzymes

The yield of transformands after ligations or Gibson assemblies with the plasmids piGEM007, piGEM008 and piGEm009 was erratically fewer than with the piGEM002, which was restricted a few weeks ago. Since the only difference between these plasmids are the ssrA-degradation tags on the gfp-gene, there should be no difference in their restriction behavior. This is aggravated by the fact that all four plasmids contain the restriction sites for NcoI and SacI on the same positions. For this reason the plasmids were restricted again, together with test plasmids to check the activity of the enzymes NcoI and SacI. The test plasmids were pMAD that contains two SacI sites, thus resulting in fragments of 4431 bp and 5235 bp size and piGEM002, restricted by NcoI and EcoRI yielding in fragments of 476 bp and 6190 bp.

Component Restriction of 07/08/09 (µL) Test I (µL) Test I (µL)
piGEM-007/008/009 (200-300 ng/µL) 10 - -
piGEM002 (ca 400 ng/µl) - 2 -
pMAD (114 ng/µl) - - 2
NcoI 1 1 -
SacI 1 - 1
EcoRI - 1 -
CutSmart Buffer 10x 2 2 2
Water 14 14 15
Total 20 20 20

The reactions were incubated at 37°C for over one hour.

   <img src="MR_2014-09-30_13.101.png" width="30%" />

According to the bands NcoI was functional, the expected bands could be seen after the restriction of piGEM002. However, the functionality of SacI was not fully determined since there was no control with the unrestricted plasmid. A band in the height between 5000 and 6000 bp could be seen, another very slight band at ca 4 kb could also be noticed, what seems to be the other expected fragment. Yet it the bigger band was more intense than the smaller one. The restricted plasmids piGEM007, 008 and 009 were in had the correct size and seemed to be restricted. These bands were pooled and purified via a Gel Ex kit.

</fieldset>