Team:Imperial/Water Report

From 2014.igem.org

Revision as of 04:06, 17 October 2014 by Despoina (Talk | contribs)

Imperial iGEM 2014

At a glance

  • Growing population, development and urbanisation make water shortages increasingly severe
  • Beyond public health implications, water shortages cause conflict and social issues throughout the world
  • Decentralisation of water treatment systems is necessary to increase resilience and adapt to changing demand
  • Wastewater recycling is increasingly essential but has technical and social hurdles to overcome
  • Innovative solutions for cost effective, decentralised water recycling are desperately needed

Introduction

All life depends on water. Our Earth, home to all species, remains the only place we know capable of sustaining life. In our search for others amongst the stars, it is water we look for first. More than 71% of the planet is covered in this resource, but only a small proportion is suitable for human use. 97.5% percent of the world’s water is salt water and of the 2.5% freshwater, nearly 70% is locked in glaciers and the ice caps. The majority of what remains is inaccessible; either as soil moisture, permafrost or deep beneath the ground. All considered, less than 0.03% of global water is viable for human use (US Geological Survey 2014). With the world’s population is rising at a rate of 80 million people a year, water demands are increasing proportionally (Worldometers no date). In order to sustain over seven billion people, we require more than 200 million litres of clean water per second (Waterwise no date). 67% of this is for agriculture, 22% for domestic, and 11% for industrial use. Our overstretched resources are very unevenly distributed. Areas with high natural resources are rarely near the urban centres of high demand and this is becoming more severe. For example the top countries for fresh water supplies, Brazil, Russia and Canada, with 30% of the world supply between them, are not areas of highest population growth, India, China and Nigeria take the top spots there (Cohen & Siu 2013).

Water Stress - An Increasing Problem

TEXT HERE

Social and Economic Effects

TEXT HERE

Sustainable Water Managemen>

Many studies have charted the perception and acceptance of recycled water over the years (Bruvold and Ward 1970; Bruvold 1972, 1979 and 1988, Nancarrow 2003, Dolnicar and Schäfer 2006, 2007 and 2009; Dolnicar and Hurlimann 2010; Hurlimann and Dolnicar 2010). Whilst levels of acceptance vary with time and location a few conclusions are consistently drawn:

  1. In general, public knowledge on the subject of water treatment and the advantages and disadvantages of different processes is relatively low.
  2. General perception of recycled water is that, whilst it is an environmentally friendly solution, there are public health concerns.
  3. Recycled water is considered acceptable for tasks such as gardening and car washing. When it comes to close body use (bathing and showering) there are reservations due to fears of residual wastewater in the recycled water.
  4. Perception is very dependant on the particular source and treatment of the water.
  5. Choice matters: in places where alternative sources of water were available, people were more sceptical of water reuse than in regions with water shortages.

Decentralising the Water Supply

TEXT HERE

Wastewater Recycling

TEXT HERE

Conclusions

Our planet’s natural water resources continue to be unsustainably exploited; as a result, we are faced with the challenges of water stress and scarcity. Climate change, population growth and urbanisation fuel the worsening crisis. To avert disaster we must rethink the way we process and use our water supplies. Promisingly, solutions are emerging but significant technological and sociological issues need to be addressed. Water treatment systems are becoming decentralised which makes the system more reliable and adaptable. Supply can be better expanded to meet changing demands and systems can be more tailored to local supplies though improvements are needed to make smaller scale plants more cost effective. Recycled wastewater is becoming an increasingly important component of our water supplies, indirect reuse is common and direct reuse, whilst initially confined to irrigation, is becoming more common. Innovations are needed to improve quality and cost as well as public confidence in the process.

References

  • Abby Josef Cohen, Rachel Siu (2013) Sustainable Growth Taking a Deep Dive into Water ONLINE Available at
  • Abra J & Simms T (no date). Low Impact Water and Wastewater Treatment. [ONLINE] Available at:
  • Abra J & Simms T (no date). Management of Water and Wastewater at Source. [ONLINE] Available at: .
  • Agence France-Presse (2014). Nobel laureates call for a revolutionary shift in how humans use resources. [ONLINE] Available at: .
  • Anderson, J., Arblaster, K., Bartley, J., Cooper, T., Kettunen, M., Kaphengst, T., ... & Holmberg, M. (2006). Climate change-induced water stress and its impact on natural and managed ecosystems. Climate change-induced water stress and its impact on natural and managed ecosystems.
  • Arnell N W 1999 Climate change and global water resources Global environmental change 9 S31-S4
  • Arnell, N. W. (2004). Climate change and global water resources: SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Global environmental change, 14(1), 31-52
  • Bruvold W & Ward P (1970) Public Attitudes Toward Uses of Reclaimed Wastewater Water & Sewage Works 120
  • Bruvold W (1972) Public Attitudes Towards Reuse of Reclaimed Water USA Univ of California
  • Bruvold W (1979) Public Attitudes Towards Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse Options USA Univ of California
  • Bruvold W (1988) Public Opinion on Water Reuse Options Journal WPCF 60 1 45
  • Cunningham E (2014). Islamic State jihadists are using water as a weapon in Iraq. [ONLINE] Available at:
  • Deutsche Borse Group (2013). Focus On: BRICS Economic Growth . [ONLINE] Available at: .
  • Dishman C, Sherrard J & Rebhun M (1989) Gaining Public Support for Direct Potable Water Reuse Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering 115 2 154
  • Dolnicar S & Hurlimann A (2009) Drinking water from alternative water sources differences in beliefs social norms and factors of perceived behavioural control across eight Australian locations, Water Science & Technology 60 6 1433-144
  • Dolnicar S & Hurlimann A (2010) Desalinated Versus Recycled Water – What Does the Public Think In Escobar
  • Dolnicar S & Schäfer A I (2007) Australians Raise Health Environment and Cost Concerns Desalination & Water Reuse 16 4 10-15
  • Dolnicar S & Schäfer A I (2009) Desalinated Versus Recycled Water — Public Perceptions and Profiles of the Accepters Journal of Environmental Management 90 888-9
  • Dolnicar S, Hurlimann A & Nghiem L (2010) The effect of information on public acceptance - The case of water from alternative sources, Journal of Environmental Management 91 1288-1293 AVAILABLE FOR FREE AT http //ro uow edu au/commpapers/713/ edie/.
  • Economics, P. (2013). World in 2050. The BRICs and Beyond: Prospects, challenges and opportunities.
  • Gikas P & Tchobanoglous G (2009) The role of satellite and decentralized strategies in water resources management, Journal of Environmental Management 90 1 144-15
  • Gleeson T, Wada Y, Bierkens M F & van Beek L P (2012) ,em>Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint Nature 488 7410 197-20
  • Gleick P H (1994) “Water, war and peace in the Middle East ” Environment Vol 36 No 3 pp 6-on Heldref Publishers Washington
  • Gleick P H 1998 “,em>Water and conflict ” See Chronologies A and B In P H
  • Gleick The World’s Water( 1998-1999) Island Press Washington D C pp 105-13
  • Greater London Authority (no date). Making every drop count. [ONLINE] Available at: .
  • Guardian (2014). Indian officials order Coca-Cola plant to close for using too much water . [ONLINE] Available at: .
  • Hofstedt, T. (2010). China's water scarcity and its implications for domestic and international stability. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 37(2), 71-83
  • Howitt R, Medellín-Azuara J, MacEwan D, Lund J, Sumner D (2014). Economic Analysis of the 2014 Drought for California Agriculture. [ONLINE] Available at: .
  • Hurlimann A & Dolnicar S (2010), Acceptance of Water Alternatives in Australia, Water Science and Technology, 61 (8), 2137-214
  • Hurlimann A & Dolnicar S (2010) When Public Opposition Defeats Alternative Water Projects - the Case of Toowoomba, Australia Water Research 44 287-29
  • I C & Schäfer A Eds Sustainable Water for the Future Water Recycling Versus Desalination Amsterdam Elsevier 375-388
  • Levine, A. D., & Asano, T. (2004). Peer reviewed: recovering sustainable water from wastewater. Environmental science & technology, 38(11), 201A-208A
  • Marks J S, Martin B & Zadoroznyj M (2006) Acceptance of Water Recycling In Australia National Baseline Data Water Journal of the Australian Water Association 33 (2) 151
  • Mascarelli A (2012), Demand for water outstrips supply , Nature
  • Masgon M. A. & Gensch R. (e.g. 2011). Water, Sanitation and Gender. [ONLINE] Available at:
  • Mengistu B. (2012). Empowering women and girls. How water, sanitation and hygiene deliver gender equality . [ONLINE] Available at:
  • Micklin, P. P. (1988). Dessication of the Aral Sea: A water management disaster in the Soviet Union. Science 241: 1170-7
  • Miller W G (2006) Integrated concepts in water reuse managing global water needs Desalination 187 1 65-75
  • Nancarrow, B Kaercher J & Po M (2002) Community Attitudes to Water Restrictions Policies and Alternative Sources: A longitudinal Analysis 1988-2002 Perth CSIRO Land and Water Consultancy Report November 2002
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). OECD environmental outlook to 2030. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Pacific Institute, Water conflict chronology timeline ONLINE Available at Pacific Institute Water conflict ONLINE Available at
  • Po M, Nancarrow B E & Kaercher J D (2003) Literature review of factors influencing public perceptions of water reuse pp 1-39 Victoria CSIRO Land and Wat
  • Pedley D (no date). Environmental Measurement . [ONLINE] Available at:
  • Principles, D. (1992, January). The Dublin statement on water and sustainable development. In International conference on water and the environment.
  • Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2008). Future Water The Government’s water strategy for England. [ONLINE] Available at: .
  • State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Water Resources (2014). Public Update for Drought Response Groundwater Basins with Potential Water Shortages and Gaps in Groundwater Monitoring. [ONLINE] Available at:
  • Svoda M (2014). US Drought Monitor. [ONLINE] Available at: .
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2006). Human Development Report 2006, Beyond Scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis
  • UN (2004). Sanitation Country Profile, Russian Federation. [ONLINE] Available at:
  • UN Water (2014). The united nations world water development report 2014 . [ONLINE] Available at: .
  • US Geological Survey (2014) How much water is there on in and above the Earth ONLINE Available at
  • Vidal J (2014). Water supply key to outcome of conflicts in Iraq and Syria, experts warn. [ONLINE] Available at:
  • Water Quality for Ecosystems and Human Health 2nd edition UNEP ERCE UNESCO 2008
  • Water, U. N. (2007). Coping with water scarcity: challenge of the twenty-first century. 2007 World Water Day.
  • WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply and Sanitation. (2012). Progress on Sanitation and Drinking-Water, 2012 Update
  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2008). Safer Water, Better Health: Costs, benefits, and sustainability of interventions to protect and promote health; Updated Table 1: WSH deaths by region, 2004.