Team:INSA-Lyon/Results

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 33: Line 33:
               <li><p>
               <li><p>
-
<div align="justify"><p>For the Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy biofilm acquisitions, all the strains were cultivated in 96-wells microplate in M63 Mannitol during 16H at 30°C (<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7e/Culture_confocal_analyse.pdf">See Protocole for details</a>). See results in <b>Figure 3</b>.</p>
+
<div align="justify"><p>For the Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy biofilm acquisitions, all the strains were cultivated in 96-wells microplate in M63 Mannitol during 16H at 30°C (<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7e/Culture_confocal_analyse.pdf">See Protocol for details</a>). See results in <b>Figure 3</b>.</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4f/Figureglobaleetoile.png" alt="les filles au labo"  
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4f/Figureglobaleetoile.png" alt="les filles au labo"  
Line 39: Line 39:
<p><b>Figure 3: Engineered bacteria biofilm characterization and quantification using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy</p></b>
<p><b>Figure 3: Engineered bacteria biofilm characterization and quantification using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy</p></b>
-
<p>All the strains used are constitutively fluorescent to allow detection with confocal laser microscopy (ZEISS LSM510 META, 40X/1.3OILDIC, laser Argon 4 lines 30 W 458 nm, 477 nm, 488 nm, 514 nm, <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7e/Culture_confocal_analyse.pdf">See Protocole</a>). Positive control/CsgA+ (Wild-type <i>E. coli</i> curli producing strain); Negative control/CsgA- (csgA-knockout <i>E. coli</i> strain); BBa_CsgA (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1404006">BBa_K1404006</a>); BBa_CsgAHis1 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1404007">BBa_K1404007</a>); BBa_CsgAHis2 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1404008">BBa_K1404008</a>). <b>A)</b> Biofilm sections obtained by Z-stack acquisitions. <b>B)</b> Biofilm 3D reconstruction using IMARIS® from acquisitions in A). <b>C) </b>Bio-volume quantification and maximum of thickness measurement using COMSTAT2 (ImageJ). The strain marked with a star is significantly different from all others (Tukey’s test, p<0.05).</p>
+
<p>All the strains used are constitutively fluorescent to allow detection with confocal laser microscopy (ZEISS LSM510 META, 40X/1.3OILDIC, laser Argon 4 lines 30 W 458 nm, 477 nm, 488 nm, 514 nm, <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7e/Culture_confocal_analyse.pdf">See Protocol</a>). Positive control/CsgA+ (Wild-type <i>E. coli</i> curli producing strain); Negative control/CsgA- (csgA-knockout <i>E. coli</i> strain); BBa_CsgA (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1404006">BBa_K1404006</a>); BBa_CsgAHis1 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1404007">BBa_K1404007</a>); BBa_CsgAHis2 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1404008">BBa_K1404008</a>). <b>A)</b> Biofilm sections obtained by Z-stack acquisitions. <b>B)</b> Biofilm 3D reconstruction using IMARIS® from acquisitions in A). <b>C) </b>Bio-volume quantification and maximum of thickness measurement using COMSTAT2 (ImageJ). The strain marked with a star is significantly different from all others (Tukey’s test, p<0.05).</p>
<p></br>As no strains carrying our parts show a significant difference with the positive control, our parts insertion doesn’t modify the biofilm formation property. <b>The His-Tag and His2-Tag engineered CsgA doesn’t disturb the curli formation.</b></p>
<p></br>As no strains carrying our parts show a significant difference with the positive control, our parts insertion doesn’t modify the biofilm formation property. <b>The His-Tag and His2-Tag engineered CsgA doesn’t disturb the curli formation.</b></p>
-
</p></div></li>
+
</p>
 +
 
 +
<p><br/><br/>We can conclude that <b>expression of CsgA derivatives</b> from the p70 <i>csg</i> promoter carried by the psb1c3 plasmid leads to <b>functional CsgA</b>, and allows <i>E. coli</i> to <b>stick and form biofilm</b>. Moreover, our results show that the <b>addition of one or two His-Tag on C-term of CsgA doesn’t disturb the normal properties of curli</b> (sturdiness, adhesion and folding of CsgA).</p></div></li>
           </ul>
           </ul>

Revision as of 17:59, 17 October 2014

Curly'on - IGEM 2014 INSA-LYON

  • Curli characterization


  • Nickel chelation


  • Survival after UV and high temperature exposure


  • Promoter optimization and characterization