Team:INSA-Lyon/Results

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 34: Line 34:
               <li><p>
               <li><p>
-
<p>For the Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy biofilm acquisitions, all the strains were cultivated in 96-wells microplate in M63 Mannitol during 16H at 30°C (See Protocole for details). See results in Figure 3.</p>
+
<div align="justify"><p>For the Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy biofilm acquisitions, all the strains were cultivated in 96-wells microplate in M63 Mannitol during 16H at 30°C (See Protocole for details). See results in Figure 3.</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4f/Figureglobaleetoile.png" alt="les filles au labo"  
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4f/Figureglobaleetoile.png" alt="les filles au labo"  
Line 40: Line 40:
<p><b>Figure 3: Engineered bacteria biofilm characterization and quantification using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy</p></b>
<p><b>Figure 3: Engineered bacteria biofilm characterization and quantification using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy</p></b>
-
All the strains used are constitutively fluorescent to allow detection with confocal laser microscopy (ZEISS LSM510 META, 40X/1.3OILDIC, laser Argon 4 lines 30 W 458 nm, 477 nm, 488 nm, 514 nm, see Protocole). Positive control/CsgA+ (Wild-type E.coli curli producing strain); Negative control/CsgA- (csgA-knockout E.coli strain); BBa_CsgA (BBa_K1404006); BBa_CsgAHis1 (BBa_K1404007); BBa_CsgAHis2 (BBa_K1404008). A) Biofilm sections obtained by Z-stack acquisitions. B) Biofilm 3D reconstruction using IMARIS® from acquisitions in A). C) Bio-volume quantification and maximum of thickness measurement using COMSTAT2 (ImageJ). The strain marked with a star is significantly different from all others (Tukey’s test, p<0.05).
+
<p>All the strains used are constitutively fluorescent to allow detection with confocal laser microscopy (ZEISS LSM510 META, 40X/1.3OILDIC, laser Argon 4 lines 30 W 458 nm, 477 nm, 488 nm, 514 nm, see Protocole). Positive control/CsgA+ (Wild-type E.coli curli producing strain); Negative control/CsgA- (csgA-knockout E.coli strain); BBa_CsgA (BBa_K1404006); BBa_CsgAHis1 (BBa_K1404007); BBa_CsgAHis2 (BBa_K1404008). A) Biofilm sections obtained by Z-stack acquisitions. B) Biofilm 3D reconstruction using IMARIS® from acquisitions in A). C) Bio-volume quantification and maximum of thickness measurement using COMSTAT2 (ImageJ). The strain marked with a star is significantly different from all others (Tukey’s test, p<0.05).</p>
-
As no strains carrying our parts show a significant difference with the positive control, our parts insertion doesn’t modify the biofilm formation property. The His-Tag and His2-Tag engineered CsgA doesn’t disturb the curli formation.  
+
<p>As no strains carrying our parts show a significant difference with the positive control, our parts insertion doesn’t modify the biofilm formation property. The His-Tag and His2-Tag engineered CsgA doesn’t disturb the curli formation.</p>
-
</p></li>
+
</p></div></li>
           </ul>
           </ul>

Revision as of 22:14, 16 October 2014

Curly'on - IGEM 2014 INSA-LYON

  • Curli characterization


  • Nickel chelation


  • Survival after UV and high temperature exposure


  • Promoter optimization and characterization