Team:BNU-China/kill

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 47: Line 47:
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<p>In the future, we plan to model the “memory time” and do more wet-experiments to confirm its feasibility. As for the modeling, we will test the expression level of promoter 1, the minimal stand of LacI to repress promoter 2 and the degradation speed of LacI. On the other hand, we will test the background expression of CI after removing IPTG to check if the CI concentration is low enough to open the promoter 3. Then we will strive to make this system more effective.  </p>
<p>In the future, we plan to model the “memory time” and do more wet-experiments to confirm its feasibility. As for the modeling, we will test the expression level of promoter 1, the minimal stand of LacI to repress promoter 2 and the degradation speed of LacI. On the other hand, we will test the background expression of CI after removing IPTG to check if the CI concentration is low enough to open the promoter 3. Then we will strive to make this system more effective.  </p>
 +
<br/><br/>
 +
<a class="button blue" style="margin-left:20px; float: left;" href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:BNU-China/labenv">Prev Page</a>
 +
<a class="button green" style="margin-left:680px" href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:BNU-China/collaboration.html">Next Page</a>
</body>
</body>
</html>
</html>
{{Team:BNU-China/foot}}
{{Team:BNU-China/foot}}

Revision as of 15:34, 12 October 2014

1 2

Kill Switch

A kill switch is designed to control “Prometheus” and to reduce biological pollution.

The difficulty is how to trigger the suicide progress spontaneously at a certain time. In the medium, the bacteria are easily controlled by adding or removing regulatory factors. However, after pouring E. coli into soil, it is hard for us to control. The suicide progress needs to be activated spontaneously. Moreover, the kill switch is supposed to be “off” for a certain time in the soil, so the bacteria will gain enough time to perform its function.

Considering the problems, toxin protein MazF is the best candidate to kill the “Prometheus” as well as to restrict the bacterial number under reasonable level.



Background

MazEF is a toxin-antitoxin module composed of mazE and mazF locating on the chromosome of E. Coli and other pathogens (Hanna et al, 2005). The expression product of mazF is a stable toxin, while that of mazE is a labile antitoxin of MazF (Hazan et al, 2004; Schusteret al., 2013). MazF is a sequence-specific mRNA endoribonuclease that initiates a programmed cell death pathway in response to various stresses. The mazEF-mediated death pathway can act as a defense mechanism that prevents the spread of bacterial phage infection, allowing bacterial populations to behave like multicellular organisms.




We also designed kill switch to control the death of E. Coli.



Design:



Fig 1. Stable State





Fig 3. Node Figure



Fig 2. Killing State





Fig 4. Truth Table



We plan to establish a new E.Coli strain without lacI and MazEF system gene to avoid the inference of cell itself. We will test cI background expression level to see if we need to knock out cI.

As is shown in Fig.1, Fig.2, Fig.3 and Fig.4, in the “Stable State”, before poured into the soil, the E. Coli fertilizer is cultured in the medium with IPTG. Promoter 1 is a weak constitutive promoter, so lacI is transcribed and translated at a considerate low level. Therefore, high concentration of IPTG, which binds LacI and changes LacI’s conformation, is able to inactive LacI and open the promoter 2. Then, CI can be highly expressed to repress promoter3. Finally, mazF is inhibited.

After fertilizing, no more IPTG exists in the soil to bind LacI. As a result, LacI with a tag which stabilize the protein takes time to accumulate to a certain high concentration, which is the repression threshold of promoter 2, aiming to represses promoter 2 as well as the expression of cI. The time needed to finish this progress is the designed “memory time”. During this process, E. coli takes its own responsibility to deliver Mo. And after that, it can be killed to reduce the pollution to environment.

As is shown in table 1, all the biobricks in the design are from the top 10 most used parts of iGEM to guarantee the feasibility.





Table 1 Biobricks used in the design



In the future, we plan to model the “memory time” and do more wet-experiments to confirm its feasibility. As for the modeling, we will test the expression level of promoter 1, the minimal stand of LacI to repress promoter 2 and the degradation speed of LacI. On the other hand, we will test the background expression of CI after removing IPTG to check if the CI concentration is low enough to open the promoter 3. Then we will strive to make this system more effective.



Prev Page Next Page