"
Team:Zamorano/PerceptionBibliography
From 2014.igem.org
Public perception of university students in Honduras about Biotechnology, Synthetic Biology and GMOs
Bibliography
Aerni, P. (2002). Stakeholder Attitudes Toward the Risks and Benefits of Agricultural Biotechnology in Developing Countries: A Comparison Between Mexico and the Philippines. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 22(6), 1123-1137.
Amin, L., Azlan, N., Ahmad, J., & Ibrahim, R. (2011). Public Perception of the Ethical Aspects of Golden Rice in Malaysia. International Journal of Science in Society, 2(4), 15-34.
Environics International. (2000). International Environmental Monitor 2000. Toronto: Environics International.
Gatharaa, V., Ngugi, J., Kilambya, D., & Gichuki, T. (2008). Consumers' Perceptions of Biotechnology in Kenya. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 9(4), 354-361.
Environics International. (2000). International Environmental Monitor 2000. Toronto: Environics International.
Ho, P., Zhao, J., & Xue, D. (2009). Access and control of agro-biotechnology: Bt cotton, ecological change and risk in China. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(2), 345-364.
Hoban, T. (2004). Public attitudes towards agricultural biotechnology. Food and Agriculture Organization.
Pauwels, E. (2013). Public understanding of Synthetic Biology. BioScience.
Pauwels E. and I. Ifrim. (2008), Trends in American and European press coverage of synthetic biology: Tracking the last five years of coverage. Synthetic Biology Project 2008.
Pauwels, E. 2009. Public perception and Media: The case of synthetic Biology. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Avaliable on: http://ec.europa.eu/bepa/european-group-ethics/docs/archives/ege-ep.pdf
Purnick, P., & Weiss, R. (2009). The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 10, 410-422. Obtenido de http://www.nature.com/nrm/journal/v10/n6/abs/nrm2698.html
