Team:Dundee/Project/dsf

From 2014.igem.org

Revision as of 22:22, 17 October 2014 by DBurrell7 (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Dundee 2014

The Diffusible Signalling Factor (DSF) Sensing System

Initial Planning and Cloning Strategy

Diffusible Signalling Factor (DSF) is a long chain cis-unsaturated fatty acid produced by bacteria of the Xanthomonas genus and the CF lung pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia1,2. To build our synthetic DSF detector, we chose to reconstitute the well-characterised DSF signal perception system from Xanthomonas campestris in our E. coli chassis. As can be seen in Fig 1, the RpfC/RpfG system, which perceives and responds to DSF, is more complex than the average two component system. DSF is detected at the periplasmic side of the inner membrane by the RpfC sensor protein, which autophosphorylates and then transfers its phospho group to the cytoplasmic response regulator RpfG. However, instead of acting as a direct transcriptional regulator, phosphorylated RpfG acts as a phosphodiesterase cleaving the second-messenger molecule cyclic di-guanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP) into two GMP molecules3,4. This reduction in cellular c-di-GMP relieves inhibition of the transcriptional activator Clp, which is then free to bind to the manA promoter and allow transcription of the downstream genes5. In our synthetic system (as shown in Fig 1) we fused the manA promoter to promoter-less gfp to give a fluorescent output.


Building the DSF Sensor

Chromosomal DNA from Xanthomonas campestris pathovar campestris 8004 was kindly gifted to us by Drs Robert Ryan and Shi-Qi An from the Division of Molecular Microbiology in the College of Life Sciences at the University of Dundee. This was used as template for the amplification of the rpfC, rpfG and clp genes, and the manA promoter region.

The manA promoter region was cloned into the pSB1C3 plasmid (to give BioBrick BBa_K1315006), and was then subcloned into pBluescript. Promoterless gfp was amplified (using BBa_K562012 as a template), and was cloned into pBluescript downstream of the manA promoter. The manA promoter-gfp construct was then subcloned into pUniprom. A schematic of our completed construct can be seen below (Fig 2).

To adhere to the iGEM rules and regulations, it was necessary to remove three specified illegal PstI restriction sites and one EcoRI site present in rpfC. We also removed one illegal EcoRI site from rpfG and one illegal PstI site from clp. Each of the modified genes were individually cloned into the pSB1C3 plasmid (to give BioBricks BBa_K1315002, BBa_K1315003, BBa_K1315005, respectively. The genes were then sequentially subcloned into the pUniprom vector that already harboured PmanA-gfp. To facilitate immunochemistry we chose to supply each of RpfC, Clp and RpfG with an influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) tag which can be detected with commercial antibodies. This tag was added to the C-terminus of each protein.


The plasmid was verified by sequencing.

The completed construct was transformed into E.coli strain MC1061 as a chassis for our biosensor.


Characterisation

A series of western blots were performed to test for the sequential production of each of the HA-tagged proteins. We transformed our plasmid series (encoding RpfC-HA, RpfC-HA + Clp-HA and RpfC-HA +Clp-HA + RpfG-HA) into E. coli strain MC1061 and blotted for recombinant protein production.


As shown in Fig 3, successful production of RpfC-HA (expected mass 81kDa), RpfG-HA (expected mass of 43kDa) and Clp-HA (expected mass 27kDa) was observed. We then went on to test our DSF detector by incubating E. coli producing the three HA-tagged proteins with increasing concentrations of pure DSF (obtained from Sigma) and monitoring for production of GFP from the manA promoter by Western blotting. As shown in Fig 4A, we were able to specifically detect GFP production in E. coli cells harbouring our DSF-detection plasmid. However we noted that GFP was being produced in the absence of exogenous DSF addition. We reasoned that this could be due to either: (i) the endogenous activation of the manA by an E. coli transcriptional regulator or (ii) the presence of DSF or a DSF-like compound in the cells and/or growth medium. To distinguish between these two possibilities we introduced pUniprom carrying the PmanA-gfp fusion alone (i.e. in the absence of the rpfC, rpfG and clp genes) into E. coli and blotted for GFP production. As shown in Fig 4B, GFP was produced by E. coli in the absence of the X. campestris DSF sensing proteins. We therefore conclude that the manA promoter is recognised by an E. coli transcription factor.


For the DSF sensing system to work we need to eliminate the background activation of PmanA-gfp. Since the X. campestris Clp protein is very similar to the E. coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) transcription factor (46% identity, 71% similarity over the whole length of the protein), we next tested whether the production of GFP was dependent upon CRP. To this end we used a cep deletion strain from the E. coli Keio mutant collection6 and compared GFP production in this strain background with the cognate wild type strain (Fig 5). However GFP was still produced (although possibly at a lower level) than in the cep+ background.


We are continuing to investigate this issue by screening other E. coli mutants carrying deletions in genes coding for transcription factors which show similarity to Clp, for example the anaerobic regulator, FNR. We anticipate that it may be necessary to make combinatorial mutations to completely eliminate exogenous GFP production.

The following parts were deposited as BioBricks:

Part Description Registry
rpfC DSF Sensor Kinase BBa_K1315002
rpfG Two-component system regulator activated by sensor kinase BBa_K1315003
clp Clp Transcriptional activator inhibited by c-di-GMP BBa_K1315005
manA manA gene promoter activated by Clp BBa_K1315006

References

1Slater, H. et al. (2000) Mol Microbiol 38, 986-1003.
2Ryan, R.P. et al. (2009) Nat Rev Microbiol 7, 514-525.
3Ryan, R.P. et al. (2006) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 6712-6717.
4Ryan, R.P. et al. (2010) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 5989-5994.
5Lu, X.-H. et al. (2012) PLOS ONE 7, e52646.
6Baba, T. et al. (2006) Mol Syst Bio 2, 2006.0008.