Team:NCTU Formosa/results

Magic Power of Our Pyramidal Device

Our device combines blue light and PBAN to achieve a powerful and specific insect attraction. In this video, we do a test to see how this combination creates an effect greater than either blue light or PBAN alone. Firstly, we feed PBAN to a female moth by placing the moth in a small beaker that contains PBAN. We covered the beaker with plastic wrap in order to keep the moth inside. Soon, we can see that the female moth starts to flap its wings frantically. This is a sign of sexual stimulation, and from this point on, the female moth starts to release pheromones.

Secondly, we transfer the beaker into our device. Then we position the device in an acrylic chamber to begin our test. We keep the chamber dark so that blue light would be the only light source inside. We did a long-time observation to record the number of insects per hour entering the device . In Fig.2-0-1, we can clearly see the magic power of our device in attracting insects.

Fig.2-0-1 The entering number (into our pyramidal device) per hour shows that the combination of blue light, PBAN, and our device is indeed magically powerful in insect attraction.

Our experiment can be divided into two categories.

1. PBAN Biobricks Tests: gene recombination and protein expression.

2. Insect Tests: PBAN effect test, insect behavior test and device test.

PBAN Biobricks Test

PBAN Gene Synthesis ( Full Gene Sequence Design Process )

To capture the harmful insects causing damage in agriculture, we first found 9 different kinds of PBAN peptide of harmful insects common in many places of the world from our long literature review. Next, we obtain the DNA sequences by reversely translating the peptide sequences of these PBANs from NCBI (ex: PBAN Spodoptera litura：http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/AAK84160.1 ) Finally, we modified every codon on the DNA sequence and designed the DNA sequence for E.coli to express a certain PBAN.

DNA Modification Process：

1. Avoid the rare codons of E.coli, and choose high frequency codons.
　　　(Frequency Table Tool：http://www.genscript.com/cgi-bin/tools/codon_freq_table)

Use [http://www.genscript.com/cgi-bin/tools/rare_codon_analysis Rare Codon Analysis Tool] to inspect if there is any problem to express our gene for E.coli.

2. Avoid choosing the same codon when modifying our designed gene sequence to prevent the E.coli from running out of 　　　　　　nucleotides due to repeated use.

3. Avoid the start codon ATG in the middle of the coding sequence.

Take the PBAN of Spodoptera litura for example：

Fig.2-1-1 The distribution of codon usage frequency along the length of your CDS to be expressed in your target host organism. Possibility of high protein expression level is correlated to the value of CAI - a CAI of 1.0 is considered to be ideal while a CAI of >0.8 is rated as good for expression in the desired expression organism. GenScript's OptimumGeneTM codon optimization tool can typically improve your sequence to reach a CAI of higher than 0.8 thus better chance of high level protein expression.

Fig.2-1-2 The ideal percentage range of GC content is between 30% to 70%. Any peaks outside of this range will adversely affect transcription and translation efficiency.

Fig.2-1-3 The percentage distribution of codons in computed codon quality groups. The value of 100 is set for the codon with the highest usage frequency for a given amino acid in the desired expression organism. Codons with values lower than 30 are likely to hamper the expression efficiency.

5. Add iGEM standard sequence in front of and at the back of our modified DNA sequence.

6. Synthesize the modified DNA sequence of PBANs in a gene synthesis company.

PCR experiment of PBAN

After receiving the DNA sequences from the gene synthesis company, we recombined each PBAN gene to PSB1C3 backbones and conducted a PCR experiment to check the size of each of the PBANs.

Fig.2-1-4 The PCR result of the 9 different kinds of PBAN. The DNA sequence length of PBANs are around 100～150 bp, so the PCR products should appear at 415～515 bp.

Below are biobrick serial numbers of PBAN abbrevation:

BM: BBa_K1415001　　　　MB: BBa_K1415002　　　　AI: BBa_K1415003

LD: BBa_K1415004　　　　SL: BBa_K1415005　　　　HAH:BBa_K1415006

AS: BBa_K1415007　　　　SI: BBa_K1415008　　　　　AA: BBa_K1415009

The DNA sequence length of the PBAN are around 100～150 bp. In this PCR experiment, the PBAN products size should be around 415～515 bp. Fig.2-1-3 showed the correct size of the PBAN, and proved that we successful ligated the PBAN DNA sequence onto an ideal backbone.

PBAN Peptide Check by SDS Protein Electrophoresis

[[File:P_cons+RBS+PBAN_Biobrick.png|link=|frameless|center|450px]]

Moreover, to verify that all 9 kinds of PBAN can be expressed by the E.coli, we conducted a SDS protein electrophoresis experiment. We first smashed the E.coli containing the PBAN with a sonicator and then took the supernatant divided from the bacterial pellet by centrifugation. Finally, we used the supernatant to run a SDS protein electrophoresis in a 20 % SDS gel.

Fig.2-1-6.1 Protein Electrophoresis of P_cons + RBS + 5 different kinds of PBAN (control: plasmid of P_cons+RBS) Each peptide of PBAN is an around 30 amino acids, so we can see the band of PBANs at 2~4 kDa.

Below are biobrick serial numbers of PBAN abbrevation:

　　　BM: BBa_K1415001　　　AA: BBa_K1415009　　　LD: BBa_K1415104　　　

　　　　　　　　　AS: BBa_K1415007　　　SL: BBa_K1415005　　　　　　　　　

Fig.2-1-6.2 Protein Electrophoresis of P_cons + RBS + 4 different kinds of PBAN (control: plasmid of P_cons+RBS) Each peptide of PBAN is an around 30 amino acids, so we can see the band of PBANs at 2~4 kDa.

Below are biobrick serial numbers of PBAN abbrevation:

AI: BBa_K1415003　　　MB: BBa_K1415002　　　HAH:BBa_K1415006　　　

SI: BBa_K1415008

These SDS PAGE results in Fig.2-1-6 showed that the bands are at 2~4 kDa for each of the PBANs, while the plasmid of P_cons+RBS weren't there (the PBAN peptide is around 30 amino acids long). This result proves that the E.coli can produce the PBAN we chosen.

Blue Light Fluorescence / Bacteria Growth Test

[[File:P_cons+RBS+PBAN+RBS+BFP+Ter_Biobrick.png|link=|frameless|center|650px]]

To predict the PBAN expression in E.coli by computer modeling, we next tested PBAN BFP biobricks. We obtained the average expressive value of the blue fluorescence in the biobrick part (above) and also the control part of P_cons + RBS + BFP + Ter. Therefore, we can use the average value to generate predictions of the PBAN expression in E.coli. (See more details in our Modeling Page). Below is the blue fluorescence expression curve and bacterial growth curve (OD 600) in a long period of time. We used these data to predict the PBAN expression in E.coli.

Fig.2-1-7 The growth curve of E.coli containing P_cons + RBS + 9 different kinds of PBAN + RBS + BFP + Ter plasmid (control: competent cells that cannot emit blue light).

Fig.2-1-8 The blue light fluorescence expression curve of E.coli containing P_cons + RBS + 9 different kinds of PBAN + RBS + BFP + Ter plasmid (control: competent cells that cannot emit blue light).

In Fig.2-1-5, we can clearly see that the blue fluorescence expressed by the E.coli is different from the control without BFP expressed.

Fig.2-1-5 Blue Fluorescence of P_cons + RBS + 9 different kinds of PBAN (control: E.coli containg P_cons+RBS Plasmid).　Below are biobrick serial numbers of the PBAN abbreviations:

SL: BBa_K1415005　　　　BM: BBa_K1415001　　　　MB: BBa_K1415002

AI: BBa_K1415003　　　　LD: BBa_K1415004　　　　HAH:BBa_K1415006

AS: BBa_K1415007　　　　SI: BBa_K1415008　　　　AA: BBa_K1415009

Obtaining PBAN from E.coli

Fig.2-2-1 The Process of Obtaining PBAN from E.coli. We first culture the E.coli that contains our constructed plasmid of P_cons + RBS + One Kind of PBAN for 12 hr. Second, We smash E.coli. with a sonicator to divide the PBAN from the cell debris pellets. Finally, we autoclave the supernatant to avoid biosafet issues.

In order to obtain PBAN from our E.coli, we first culture the E.coli that contains our constructed plasmid of P_cons + RBS + One Kind of PBAN in best time condition at which the blue light fluorescence expression reaches the maximum value. Then, we centrifuged the bacterial solution to pour LB broth and suspend the E.coli. pellet with pure water later for the next step. From this step, we can get the LB-free solution, which is better for our insect experiment. Then, we smash the E.coli with a sonicator and dilute this PBAN solution with 250ml pure water in serum bottle. Finally, we autoclave PBAN solution to avoid biosafety issues. As we know, PBAN is a very simple and short peptide so it will not be degraded after the autoclave treatment. A very small amount (10pmol) of PBAN can stimulate the maximum production of pheromone, therefore, we don't have to worry that our PBAN concentration will be inadequate after diluting with 250 ml pure water. Overall, we can simply use the autoclaved solution without purification, following our recommended culturing condtitions.

Fig.2-2-2
We culture the E.coli. in best time condition to have the maximum expression of PBAN.

Below are biobrick serial numbers of PBAN abbrevation:

BM: BBa_K1415001
HAH:BBa_K1415006
SL: BBa_K1415005

Fig.2-2-4
We smash the E.coli with a sonicator.

Below are biobrick serial numbers of PBAN abbrevation:

BM: BBa_K1415001
HAH:BBa_K1415006
SL: BBa_K1415005

Fig.2-2-3
We centrifuged the bacterial solution to pour LB broth.

Below are biobrick serial numbers of PBAN abbrevation:

BM: BBa_K1415001
HAH:BBa_K1415006
SL: BBa_K1415005

Fig.2-2-5
We dilute this PBAN solution with 250ml pure water in serum bottle.

Below are biobrick serial numbers of PBAN abbrevation:

BM: BBa_K1415001
HAH:BBa_K1415006
SL: BBa_K1415005

Fig.2-2-6
We autoclave PBAN solution to avoid biosafety issues.

Insect Tests

Behavior of Target Insects After PBAN Treatment

To investigate what behavior the female moth would show after ingesting PBAN, we put one female moth into a beaker for observation. The beaker is divided into two parts by plastic wrap. The bottom part contains the PBAN solution we prepared, and the upper part is the space for the moth to stay. We soaked cotton that spans the entire length of the beaker with the PBAN solution and sprinkle it with sugar. This way, the moth can suck on the PBAN without drowning in PBAN solution. After all the equipment is set, we put the female moth into the upper part of the beaker. At the time, we started filming as soon as we observed the female moth showing obvious behaviors of sexual stimulation such as flapping their wings.

The appearance of 9 kinds of target insects is different in a year. We do the observation in about September to October which is the most active time for Spodoptera litura, Mamestra brassicae and Helicoverpa armigera Hubner. Therefore, In this observation, we choose these three kinds of moth as sample moths were caught in Sunny Morning organic farm.

We observed that the moth could absorb the PBAN in the solution through ingestion, and that the PBAN could stimulate the moth's pheromone gland to produce pheromone. As soon as the moth is sexually excited, it would flap its wings rapidly and move its tail slightly upward .

These movies show the behaviors of 3 different kinds of female moths after ingesting their separate PBANs. Each of the moths clearly became excited and all flapped their wings rapidly.

Effective Attraction after PBAN Treatment

After observing how PBAN treatment affects the behavior of female moths, we want to check the attractive effect of the moths. We expected that, after ingesting the PBAN, the female moth would not only become excited, flap its wings, but also actually attract male moths to aggregate together. We used two beakers which are the same as what we used in the former experiment. One contained PBAN solution and the other contained only sucrose solution as control. We first put one beaker at one side and the other at the opposite side in a moth box (shown in Fig.2-3-1). Then we put two female moths in each beaker and at least 100 male moths in the moth box. This time, we did a long time observation and took a picture with our camera. In Fig.2-3-1, the female moth ingested the PBAN then attracted more male moths than the one ingesting the sucrose solution. Thus, Fig.2-3-1 can prove that the female moth ingested our PBAN then released a large amount of sex pheromone to attract many male moths. In addition, we conducted a simple test to compare the luring effect of female moths eating PBAN solution with that of sucrose solution (moth's favorite food). Again, we can see the conspicuous effect.

Fig.2-3-1 Negative Control: Female moth ingesting sucrose solution without PBAN (number = 0). Experiment: Female moth ingesting PBAN (number = 11). In this picture, we can see the that the female moth ingesting PBAN solution can release much sex pheromone, and attract many male moths.

Fig.2-3-2 Negative Control：sucrose solution, Experiment：Female moth eating PBAN solution. Also, we can see the PBAN effect again from this picture.

Spodoptera Litura's Preference for Temperature and Light

As we know, light can attract many kinds of harmful insects.

Temperature is another environmental factor which the farmer can not change practically. We want to use computer modeling to explore in depth the moths' preferences for different combinations of light and temperature conditions. In the future, we hope that farmers can choose the appropriate light according to temperature condition when using our device. For this purpose, we chose the average temperature range in Taiwan in a year, and most common harmful insect, Spodoptera Litura to conduct this test (Fig.2-3-3 below), which we used to model the moths' preferences for different combinations of light and temperature conditions with ANFIS (see detail in the device modeling page).

Fig.2-3-3 Result of 30 repeats of Spodoptera Litura's preference testing for temperature and light (there are some moths staying in the bottom in every test). In this table, we can see blue light has a consistent attractive effect Spodoptera Litura under different temperature condition.

Fig.2-3-4 Modeling tool (CCW No.1) for this test. We use blue, green, red, yellow,Positive Control: white at the same time under different temperature conditions for our device modeling testing. Spodoptera Lituras were packed into the central barrel. Every test was followed by continuous beating on the barrel for 5 min in order to make the moths fly.

　Fig.2-3-3 shows blue light has consistent attraction to our target harmful moth, Spodoptera Litura, in any temperature condition. Thus, we decided to use blue LED light in our device design.