Team:Cambridge-JIC/Project

From 2014.igem.org

Revision as of 12:09, 16 October 2014 by Tnghiem (Talk | contribs)

Cambridge iGEM 2014


Mosbi

We share the belief synthetic biology will play an important role in the future – from drug development and the creation of smarter biosensors, to agriculture, the food industry and inevitably space exploration.
However – synthetic biology is at the moment almost exclusively restricted to academic institutions and specific industries. Our team wants to change this by bringing synthetic biology to your living room!
mӧsbi stands for marchantia open-source biosensor. The name encapsulates the team's vision of creating a user-friendly, open-source biosensor using the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha.

Overview

The Chassis

Marchantia polymorpha represents the perfect choice in the endeavour of popularising synthetic biology and making it accessible to a larger audience. There are several reasons for this:

  1. Marchantia polymorpha is a plant. Since plants play a role in every culture, people are comforable around them – unlike bacteria. We realised that if we wanted to push forward the idea of a biosensor accessible to everyone it would have to be intrinsically user-friendly. What better than a small, low-maintenance, thalloid plant with tiny palm tree-like structures?
  2. It has a small haploid genome which can be easily manipulated. Marchantia's genome size is only 280 Mb, which is little compared to other plants comonly used in biology. A haploid genome allows the user to disregard factors such as gene dominance relationships on genetically modifying the plant. With upcoming advances in mapping the genome, Marchantia represents an ideal candidate for an open-source platform.
  3. Marchantia is dioecious and has a short life cycle. Being dioecious, Marchantia exists as either male or female plants, which are easily distinguishable at adult stages through the shape of their gametophyte. This in turn simplifies the crossing of two plants to an inexperienced user. Compared to the majority of other plants, the Marchantia polymorpha life cycle is short. It takes less than 3 months for a Marchantia plant to grow from a spore into an adult plant capable of reproduction. It is no match to E. coli but is surely beats other plants used in synthetic biology.
  4. A single plant can produce hundreds of thousands of spores. The spores are very hardy, allowing them to be kept for over a year in a dry container. In addition, the hardiness allows for spores to be easily shipped without worrying about handling and temperature swings. Upon adding water to the spores, germination begins and the tiny plant begins to develop. The sheer amount of spores produced by a single plant ensures*the presence of the desired offspring in the progeny.
  5. Marchantia biosensors are renewable. The plants are easy to vegetatively propagate – either by grafting or via gemmae, tiny clones of the plants sporadically generated in gemma cups on the plant's surface. This ensures once a useful biosensor is generated for it to be easily distributed to your friends and family.


The Framework

Our team's efforts over the summer have been focused on developing a plug-and-play style framework which allows the end user to easily design custom mӧsbi biosensors without requiring any specialist scientific knowledge. This framework represents the core concept behind mӧsbi.
The mӧsbi framework is composed of 3 modules – input, processing and output. A combination of any modules from each of these 3 categories enables the formation of a unique mӧsbi biosensor.
To ensure a theoretically unlimited level of mix-and-match is possible we developed a sturdy and universal framework design based around two transcription factors – GAL4 and HAP1.

Figure 1: Illustration of the idea behind mӧsbi's modularity

GAL4 represents the transcription factor relaying the information between the input and processing modules. GAL4 is a yeast transcription factor commonly used in eukaryote gentic engineering. Gal4 has been previously shown to work in Marchantia polymorpha within the Haseloff lab which convinced us in using it as part of the mӧsbi framework. HAP1 is also a transcription factor that has been highly speculated to work in our chassis. HAP1 is in charge of transmitting the information between the processing and output modules.
These two transcription factors act as connectors between the input, processing and output modules. Input modules act as the sensing modules in the mӧsbi framework. A specific signal is eventually relayed to the promoter present in the input module. Upon doing so, the transcription of the first linking transcription factor GAL4 is initiated. Upon successful translation, GAL4 acts on the GAL4 UAS promoter present in the processing module thus initiating the transcription of HAP1. HAP1 acts as the second linking transcription factor, relaying information between the processing and the output modules. HAP1 acts on the HAP1 UAS promoter of the output, commencing the transcription of the output gene – which are selected to be easily detected by the user.
The universally adopted mӧsbi framework design allows compatibility between existing and future mӧsbi modules. For the average user this means no worries associated with compatibility between modules since they all operate in the same fashion. On the other hand more adventurous developers can rely on a sturdy and universal framework when designing new modules.

Figure 1: Illustration of the idea behind mӧsbi's modularity

Assembling the Modules

Assembling a mӧsbi biosensor is arguably the simplest stage in creating bespoke biosensors. We have taken advantage of an innate ability of Marchantia polymorpha which allows us to generate new mӧsbis – good old fashioned crossing. By crossing plant lines with different single modules or module pairs (i.e. input-processor) – the so called seed lines - a proportion of the progeny will inevitably carry both parents' modules – in this way forming a partially or fully-assembled mӧsbi biosensor.
The crossing itself is an easy task which can be performed by anyone – including a child. One needs only to use a brush, dip it into water and brush the archegoniophores of a male and female plants from pre-selected seed line plants. This can be repeated several times and between different lines, giving rise to multiple mӧsbi variations from relatively few seed lines.
Selecting the recombinant progeny is done using pre-supplied (or independently created) antibiotic resistance plates. All mӧsbi modules are to be designed possessing specific antibiotic resistance genes in each module – DETAIL (WHICH 3?). After the cross is completed and progeny spores are produced, these are incubated on the antibiotic plates. Only mӧsbis with 2 (in case of a 2-step cross) or all 3 modules will be able to grow on a given plate. In this way only the mӧsbi biosensors of interest are selected.
The assembly time varies depending if a 1 or 2-step assembly process is chosen by the user. A 1-step assembly process, starting with growing the seed lines from spores and finishing with the assembled mӧsbi biosensors growing on a selective plate will likely take approximately 2 months. Assembling a mӧsbi biosensor is certainly not an overnight task, however its simplicity and low equipment and knowledge requirements make it an interesting product for a new audience.


The Framework

Our team's efforts over the summer have been focused on developing a plug-and-play style framework which allows the end user to easily design custom mӧsbi biosensors without requiring any specialist scientific knowledge. This framework represents the core concept behind mӧsbi.
The mӧsbi framework is composed of 3 modules – input, processing and output. A combination of any modules from each of these 3 categories enables the formation of a unique mӧsbi biosensor.
To ensure a theoretically unlimited level of mix-and-match is possible we developed a sturdy and universal framework design based around two transcription factors – GAL4 and HAP1.

Figure 1: Illustration of the idea behind mӧsbi's modularity

GAL4 represents the transcription factor relaying the information between the input and processing modules. GAL4 is a yeast transcription factor commonly used in eukaryote gentic engineering. Gal4 has been previously shown to work in Marchantia polymorpha within the Haseloff lab which convinced us in using it as part of the mӧsbi framework. HAP1 is also a transcription factor that has been highly speculated to work in our chassis. HAP1 is in charge of transmitting the information between the processing and output modules.
These two transcription factors act as connectors between the input, processing and output modules. Input modules act as the sensing modules in the mӧsbi framework. A specific signal is eventually relayed to the promoter present in the input module. Upon doing so, the transcription of the first linking transcription factor GAL4 is initiated. Upon successful translation, GAL4 acts on the GAL4 UAS promoter present in the processing module thus initiating the transcription of HAP1. HAP1 acts as the second linking transcription factor, relaying information between the processing and the output modules. HAP1 acts on the HAP1 UAS promoter of the output, commencing the transcription of the output gene – which are selected to be easily detected by the user.
The universally adopted mӧsbi framework design allows compatibility between existing and future mӧsbi modules. For the average user this means no worries associated with compatibility between modules since they all operate in the same fashion. On the other hand more adventurous developers can rely on a sturdy and universal framework when designing new modules.

Figure 1: Illustration of the idea behind mӧsbi's modularity

Vision

OUR VISION

We envisioned mösbi as a new approach to popularise synthetic biology – both within the scope of the iGEM competition and beyond. However, as most people who have dabbled with biology know, nothing in biology ever seems to work first time. In our case the time limitations imposed prevented us on developing mösbi to its full potential.

Here we share some thoughts on future steps that would have been taken in order to complete this part of the project and our vision for this new and exciting undertaking.

As you may have noted so far, mösbi is aimed at the people to give a larger-than-usual audience. The key message about mösbi remains its unorthodox accessibility. Accessibility in terms of requiring little or no scientific knowledge to use the product; accessibility in terms of its honest and open-source design so that everyone wishing to understand its working and willing to contribute may do so; accessibility in terms of creating an affordable and powerful analytic tool for everyone to use.

Education plays an important role in our vision. We see mösbi as a herald of the current post-genomic era – bringing current technological advances directly to people who may otherwise be unaffected or indifferent towards them. Bringing synthetic biology into the living room would allow us to educate people about this area of science: Its current status, its future and their role in it. It would allow us to communicate honestly about the benefits and risks associated with genetic engineering and synthetic biology. In addition, mösbi would represent something of a biological version of Arduino – an open-source platform to experiment and learn with, thus likely a popular choice for young science aficionados throughout primary and secondary education.

Although remaining open-source, some level of supervision over the future development of mösbi would be required. This should be carried out by a not-for-profit organisation which would keep researching new modules, reviewing user created ones and supervising the distribution of seed lines and paraphernalia required for mösbi assembly. This paraphernalia – i.e. antibiotic resistance plates, auxotroph nutrient supplemented soil, growth boxes like the one our team built could provide a partial source of income for further platform development and organisation running costs.

There is much more that would need to be done before mösbi could reach this level of impact. Firstly, output reporter genes especially chromoproteins, need to be optimised for expression in the new chassis. Development of auxotrophic lines of Marchantia represents another necessity. Tests with seed line crossing and possible framework optimisation would need to be carried out to ensure mösbi works as planned. Additional thought would need to be given about legal implications of such a product and carefully assessed. There is a large scope for improvement. The above listed undertakings will certainly become easier to achieve as the chassis develops through basic research in the upcoming years. We like to think iGEM has made and will keep making contributions on this front over the next decade.

To conclude, we hope that in a decade or so - when accessible, user-friendly biosensors are a reality, one will be able to look back on this effort and see it as a grain of sand in a larger picture that helped drive synthetic biology forward.

Edit this page