The ideas about the kill-switch and what was needed for its construction where finalized. Therefore research was done an suitable parts and solutions where found in papers, the registry and other literature.
More repressors than the lacI repressor and the tetR repressor where needed so CIλ was used. The promoters that where repressed by combinations of CIλ and tetR or lacI in the registry where not characterized. Since the ciλ repressor has an important role in the design these promoters had to be characterized. But CIλ is non incunabula so the rhamnose mediated characterization was developed.
Besides the finalizing of the designs, lab work was prepared by making plates and preparing parts we needed.
An in silco assembly of all the characterization plasmids that would be needed and the final system was done. After the in silico experiment flowcharts where made to as an overview of the process.
You can find the parts we used on the kill-switch page
The promoters from the registry where assembled with GFP and RFP. The assemblies whit GFP where eventually successful but the assembly with RFP did not work.
The Rhamnose promoter was assembled with the TetR, LacI, CIλ repressor, CIλ combined with TetR, CIλ combined with LacI and GFP so that it could be combined With the different promoters with GFP.
The promoters from the registry where also combined with TetR, TetR combined with GFP, lacI and lacI combined with GFP. These parts can be used to construct toggle switches with and without GFP. The toggle switches can be used for validation and characterization of the toggle switch.
The rhanmnose inducible promoter that was combined with CIλ was assembled together with the CI/Tet promoter with GFP to create the input-output plasmid. This plasmid was then tested on plates with and without rhamnose, as can be seen on the kill-switch wiki page, and proven to work.
When we performed some test on the two plasmids system and co-transformation we found out that the low copy number plasmid 4A5 had really high miniprep values and didn’t appear to be a low copy number plasmid.
The model that was made showed that the promoters from the registry with their current operator configuration where not likely to be stable for a long time period. Therefore new promoters had to be created and the necessary research was started.
Because 4A5 didn’t appear to be a low copy number plasmid other backbones where tried. The repressor parts where assembled into 6A1 but after assembly it also did not appear to be a low copy number plasmid.
The promoter design was finished and primers where ordered at eurogentech. The promoters where then used in primer extension with this protocol. After primer extension it was digested and asebled in 1A3. The plasmids with the promoter where then digested and assembled with GFP and repressors to make the toggle switch.
The testing of the protocol was finished and a characterization of the new Ptet promoter (P1) and PcI/Lac from the registry was started.
The assembly of the new promoters (whit GFP) and the registry promoters (with GFP) with the rhamnose repressor plasmids was continued. This time everything was put into one plasmid, pSB3K3, since there seemed to be no other low copy number plasmid.
Products and intermediates where assembled into pSB1C3 and send to iGEM headquarters.