Team:Oxford/biosensor realisation
From 2014.igem.org
Revision as of 08:10, 30 September 2014 by MatthewBooth (Talk | contribs)
Introduction
We thought that it was important to think properly about how the system would be implemented in reality and to keep that in mind throughout the whole project. This meant that we could keep our research constantly focussed on the end product.As such, in addition to completely designing the system on SolidWorks, we have maximised use of facilities available to us and we have 3D printed the biosensor product, complete with our DCMation branding. On top of this, we designed and constructed very cheap electronics that are sensitive to even small amounts of GFP.
For our user friendly kit we required a circuit which displayed a simple on/off output once a certain level of DCM had been reached. The biochemists attached super-folder green fluorescent protein (SFGFP) to the promoter region of DCMA, such that when DCM is present, DCMA is produced and the bacteria have the ability to glow.
Figure 1 After initially assuming that GFP glowed on its own, the biochemists informed me that it needed to be excited by a specific wavelength of light before it could glow. For our project we chose to use SFGFP as it more stable than regular GFP. SFGFP has an absorption peak at 485nm and an emission peak at 520nm. Whilst there was plenty of data for GFP, SFGFP absorption and emission spectra data could not be found. As such we have used the spectra for EGFP which we believe to be very similar to that of SFGFP. As can be seen in figure 1, the absorption (blue) and emission (green) spectra cover quite a range of wavelengths with considerable overlap around the 500nm region. This overlap requires careful consideration in the design of the overall bio-detection kit as the excitation and emission light will mix and become indistinguishable to unfiltered sensors.
The configuration in our end product will follow that shown in figure 2. We will use blue LEDs to excite our SFGFP, they are ideal as they emit light in the range 450-500nm and are very cheap. Photodiodes are highly sensitive to the direction of the incoming light, so we will manipulate the circuit such that the LEDs lie at right angles to the photodiodes to reduce the amount of incident blue light. The mix of the blue excitation from the LED and the green emission light from the SFGFP will then be passed through a filter, which has the absorption spectra shown in figure 4. This filter will absorb lots of the blue light and little of the green light, so that a larger portion of the incident light on the photodiode is the signal we want to measure. We can calibrate our photodiode to ignore the small amounts of blue light transmitted through the filter, by taking light measurements whilst there is no SFGFP present.
Figure 1 After initially assuming that GFP glowed on its own, the biochemists informed me that it needed to be excited by a specific wavelength of light before it could glow. For our project we chose to use SFGFP as it more stable than regular GFP. SFGFP has an absorption peak at 485nm and an emission peak at 520nm. Whilst there was plenty of data for GFP, SFGFP absorption and emission spectra data could not be found. As such we have used the spectra for EGFP which we believe to be very similar to that of SFGFP. As can be seen in figure 1, the absorption (blue) and emission (green) spectra cover quite a range of wavelengths with considerable overlap around the 500nm region. This overlap requires careful consideration in the design of the overall bio-detection kit as the excitation and emission light will mix and become indistinguishable to unfiltered sensors.
The configuration in our end product will follow that shown in figure 2. We will use blue LEDs to excite our SFGFP, they are ideal as they emit light in the range 450-500nm and are very cheap. Photodiodes are highly sensitive to the direction of the incoming light, so we will manipulate the circuit such that the LEDs lie at right angles to the photodiodes to reduce the amount of incident blue light. The mix of the blue excitation from the LED and the green emission light from the SFGFP will then be passed through a filter, which has the absorption spectra shown in figure 4. This filter will absorb lots of the blue light and little of the green light, so that a larger portion of the incident light on the photodiode is the signal we want to measure. We can calibrate our photodiode to ignore the small amounts of blue light transmitted through the filter, by taking light measurements whilst there is no SFGFP present.
To simplify the electrical analysis I will talk about the voltage levels at varying points throughout the circuit with two different light levels, light and dark.
A. When light is incident on the photodiode, a small voltage is created across its terminals. This voltage is immediately amplified by 10 to get a larger voltage at node A. (Using the BPW21 photodiode on the fifth floor of the Thom building, Vlight=4V and Vdark=-6V.) The voltage produced at A is now a sizeable amount but it is offset from 0V, which will make further analysis harder.
B. Using a voltage divider resistor network, we created a fixed voltage point equal to the dark voltage offset at A. We put an OP-AMP setup as a voltage follower between this and the next part of the circuit, to isolate the network and ensure that the voltage level created wasn’t affected by any circuitry downstream. This fixed voltage (-6V) can be measured at the node labelled OFFSET. We inputted the voltages A and OFFSET into a unity gain comparator. Which created a voltage at B which follows the equation B=OFFSET-A. By having the OFFSET equal to Vdark, it will cause the voltage for one of the light levels to be 0V. (Now at node B, Vlight=-10V and Vdark=0.)
C. If necessary we can amplify the voltage at B again using the non-inverting amplifier which has a gain which follow the equation: Gain=1+R10/R9. With the resistor values seen in figure 5, the gain=10. Although the maximum voltage we can produce is limited by the OP-AMP’s inability to provide voltages larger than the power rails which supply it (+/-15V). So by using the BPW21 no further amplification is available, so I removed R9 so that the gain was reduced down to Gain=1. So that at C we have Vlight=-10V and Vdark=0V.
D. For the final stage, we created another fixed voltage point which will control the threshold light level (-5V). Since the last OP-AMP has no feedback, the gain is effectively infinite and the output will saturate to the power rails. If the voltage at C is larger than -5V (Vdark=0), the output of the OP-AMP will saturate positively causing the voltage at node D= +15V. This will cause the green LED to illuminate, indicating that it is safe to pour down the sink as there is no light being produced, as there is no SFGFP present because there is no DCM left. When the voltage at C is lower than -5V (Vlight=-10), the output of the OP-AMP will saturate negatively causing the voltage at node D=-15V. This will cause the red LED to illuminate, indicating that it is not safe to pour down the sink as there is light being produce, as there is GFP present because there is still DCM left.
As desired we have a binary output which simply shows the user when the DCM mixture is safe to pour down the sink.
A. When light is incident on the photodiode, a small voltage is created across its terminals. This voltage is immediately amplified by 10 to get a larger voltage at node A. (Using the BPW21 photodiode on the fifth floor of the Thom building, Vlight=4V and Vdark=-6V.) The voltage produced at A is now a sizeable amount but it is offset from 0V, which will make further analysis harder.
B. Using a voltage divider resistor network, we created a fixed voltage point equal to the dark voltage offset at A. We put an OP-AMP setup as a voltage follower between this and the next part of the circuit, to isolate the network and ensure that the voltage level created wasn’t affected by any circuitry downstream. This fixed voltage (-6V) can be measured at the node labelled OFFSET. We inputted the voltages A and OFFSET into a unity gain comparator. Which created a voltage at B which follows the equation B=OFFSET-A. By having the OFFSET equal to Vdark, it will cause the voltage for one of the light levels to be 0V. (Now at node B, Vlight=-10V and Vdark=0.)
C. If necessary we can amplify the voltage at B again using the non-inverting amplifier which has a gain which follow the equation: Gain=1+R10/R9. With the resistor values seen in figure 5, the gain=10. Although the maximum voltage we can produce is limited by the OP-AMP’s inability to provide voltages larger than the power rails which supply it (+/-15V). So by using the BPW21 no further amplification is available, so I removed R9 so that the gain was reduced down to Gain=1. So that at C we have Vlight=-10V and Vdark=0V.
D. For the final stage, we created another fixed voltage point which will control the threshold light level (-5V). Since the last OP-AMP has no feedback, the gain is effectively infinite and the output will saturate to the power rails. If the voltage at C is larger than -5V (Vdark=0), the output of the OP-AMP will saturate positively causing the voltage at node D= +15V. This will cause the green LED to illuminate, indicating that it is safe to pour down the sink as there is no light being produced, as there is no SFGFP present because there is no DCM left. When the voltage at C is lower than -5V (Vlight=-10), the output of the OP-AMP will saturate negatively causing the voltage at node D=-15V. This will cause the red LED to illuminate, indicating that it is not safe to pour down the sink as there is light being produce, as there is GFP present because there is still DCM left.
As desired we have a binary output which simply shows the user when the DCM mixture is safe to pour down the sink.
The replaceable cartridge
This cartridge is where the reporting bacteria would be held. The basic design is a block of agarose containing the bacteria, surrounded by a thin film, encased in a solid plastic shell to make it more user friendly. This cartridge is therefore very cheap and simple as it would have to be replaced every time the reporting bacteria culture became unusable.The design shown here is an initial idea that is aesthetically pleasing.
The housing for the electronics
This housing is designed to contain the replaceable cartridge. The GFP sensing circuit will be contained in the top half of the box shown here to allow the circuit (specifically the light sensing diodes and the blue LEDs (both shown in the 3D images below)) to have maximum exposure to the reporting bacteria. The design also allows the cartridge to have maximum exposure to the solution that it is sensing.Oxford iGEM 2014
To construct the complicated shape of the biosensor housing, we had to 3D print two halves of the biosensor individually so that we could have hollow sections. This is because 3D printers can’t easily construct anything that isn’t fully supported. This is the one major drawback of this type of rapid prototyping. The files of this construction are shown below.
Therefore, when we 3D printed the cartridge, we couldn’t go for the fancy designs that are shown above in SolidWorks. Therefore we had to opt for a much more linear design. The files of this construction are shown below.
These files were then transferred into Meshmixer . This planned out the actual printing of the components and performed certain useful features such as strength analysis to allow us to spot any large weaknesses before printing took place.
Pictures of the finished biosensor are shown below. The idea is that this biosensor can then be used as a very cheap sensor that can give a basic binary answer to the question ‘is there a safe level of chlorinated solvents present?’ This safe level will ideally be the 5ppm that is the maximum safe level for drinking water in the UK.
Oxford iGEM 2014
Retrieved from "http://2014.igem.org/Team:Oxford/biosensor_realisation"