T7 Riboregulation System: Experimental Design
Strains, Plasmids, and Reagents
E. coli strains used in this study included BL21(E. coli B F- dcm ompT hsdS(rB- mB-) gal [malB+]K-12(λS)), BL21(DE3)( F– ompT gal dcm lon hsdSB(rB- mB-) λ(DE3 [lacI lacUV5-T7 gene 1 ind1 sam7 nin5])), ECNR2(ΔmutS:cat.Δ(ybhB-bioAB): [λcI857.Δ(cro-ea59):tetR-bla]), Mach1(ΔrecA1398 endA1 tonA Φ80ΔlacM15 ΔlacX74 hsdR(rK- mK+)), and 730. Strains used for transformation were grown in LB min (Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2006). Cells used for cloning and mini-prep were grown in selective medium of 2XYT (2xYt Medium (7281) 2010) with either kanamycin (American Bioanalytical) or spectinomycin (Sigma-Aldrich). Kanamycin and streptomycin were used at 30 mg/mL and 95 mg/mL respectively.
One percent agarose gels were made with 0.5% TBE obtained from American Bio and stained with either ethidium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich) in the case of screening or SYBR Safe (Invitrogen) in the case of cloning. Gel extraction and purification was completed with QIAprep Gel Extraction Kit following the protocol provided. PCR purification was accomplished with the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit, following the protocol provided. Plasmid purification was accomplished using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit and the protocol provided. For all DNA kits provided by QIAgen we used Denville Spin Columns for Nucleic Acid Purification. The concentration of DNA was measured using a Biotek Synergy HT Multi-Mode microplate Reader with accompanying Take3 Microvolume plates. All restriction enzymes, and Gibson Assembly Master Mix are from New England Biolabs. Hifi HotStart Readymix and 2GFAST Readymix with loading dye for PCR were obtained from KAPA Biosystems.
Two Levels of Regulation for T7 Polymerase Expression
Our goal is to reduce the expression of T7 RNA polymerase and create an efficient system for the expression of heterologous proteins in E. coli. In order to carry this out, we chose to introduce two levels of regulation. The first level of regulation will be at the transcriptional level. We will use pZE21 of the pZ system of vectors developed by Lutz and Buschard with the PLlacO promoter to inhibit the expression of T7 RNA polymerase. The PLlacO promoter controls the expression of the crRNA (cis repressing RNA) and is induced by IPTG (isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside). The second level of regulation will occur at the translational level. We will use the artificial riboregulatory elements (Figure 2) devised by Isaacs et al. to restrict translation of the mRNA sequence encoding the T7 RNA Polymerase (Isaacs et al., 2004). The cis-repressing RNA (crRNA) sequence will be inserted downstream of the promoter driving T7 RNA Polymerase and upstream of the ribosomal binding site (RBS). The crRNA is complimentary to the RBS and forms a stem loop at the 5’ end of the mRNA segment, blocking ribosomal docking and translation. A second promoter, PLtetO, which is induced by ATC, will express the trans-activating RNA (taRNA) capable of undergoing a linear-loop interaction that will expose the RBS and allow for translation of T7 RNA Polymerase. Once the T7 RNA Polymerase is expressed, it can then bind to the T7 Promoter and lead to the expression of the gene of interest, such as the antimicrobial peptide (Figure 3).
The ribo-regulated T7 RNA Polymerase (formally known as α12c) and the TolC selection marker will be ultimately incorporated into a conjugative plasmid and into the genome of E.coli to control for copy number (Figure 2a and 2b). The reason why it is important to control for copy number is that the copy number of the pZE21 backbone is fairly large. This means that it will be more challenging for the cell to regulate protein expression, so a low copy number would enable better cell regulation of proteins. A second pZ plasmid will contain the gene of interest expressed by a T7 promoter. Finally, the third plasmid will contain the orthogonal translation system (Figure 3a and 3b). The benefit of this type of system is that it is robust and can be easily re-engineered, portable in the form of plasmids, compatible across multiple E.coli strains, and efficient in that it does not require the cell to expend more energy on the constitutive synthesis of another protein. We hypothesize that by utilizing these two levels of control, we will be able to reduce the expression of T7 RNA polymerase and produce a system with zero basal expression of the gene of interest.
|
Anti-Fouling Peptide Construct: Experimental Design
We hypothesize that we can develop an improved version of the current adhesives by developing a fusion protein of Mgfp-5 with Mefp-1 as the anchoring region for the anti-biofouling peptide. An integral part of developing this peptide is to co-translationally insert L-DOPA into our peptide, which has never been done before with mussel foot proteins (Figure 5). In this process of orthogonal translation, we first will get rid of the UAG stop codon and then transform the strain to synthesize tRNA and tRNA transferase that corresponds to the UAG codon and the L-DOPA non-standard amino acid to develop the GRO. The advantage of this procedure is that we have the ability to skip the time-consuming and inefficient tyrosinase enzyme treatment step.
Protein Purification
We plan to purify the protein by using the Twin Strep Tag in tandem with the Flag tag, which was included in out master construct of the anti-biofouling peptide (Figure 6). The Flag tag is perfectly cleavable by the enzyme enterokinase. The FLAG tag is made up of 8 amino acids and works well for low-abundance proteins. It is hydrophilic, so it will most likely not interfere with protein folding and function of the target protein. The Strep tag is also made up of 8 amino acids that will not disturb the protein’s functions. We chose the FLAG tag because it is perfectly cleavable. Info on LL-37 and N-terminus? The protein will be purified in a Strep-Tactin® Sepharose® column. In order to address the L-DOPA adhesive L-DOPA component, our final step is to elute with a base to reduce the amount of the anti-biofouling peptide that sticks to the column due to L-DOPA adhesion (Figure 7).
Flag Tag Sequence: Asp-Tyr-Lys-Asp-Asp-Asp-Asp-Lys
Strep Tag Sequence: Sequence: Trp-Ser-His-Pro-Gln-Phe-Glu-Lys
|
Characterization of Coating Adhesion Properties
We hypothesize that we can develop an improved version of the current adhesives by developing a fusion protein of Mgfp-5 with Mefp-1 as the anchoring region for the anti-biofouling peptide. An integral part of developing this peptide is to co-translationally insert L-DOPA into our peptide, which has never been done before with mussel foot proteins (Figure 5). In this process of orthogonal translation, we first will get rid of the UAG stop codon and then transform the strain to synthesize tRNA and tRNA transferase that corresponds to the UAG codon and the L-DOPA non-standard amino acid to develop the GRO. The advantage of this procedure is that we have the ability to skip the time-consuming and inefficient tyrosinase enzyme treatment step.
Protein Purification
We plan to purify the protein by using the Twin Strep Tag in tandem with the Flag tag, which was included in out master construct of the anti-biofouling peptide (Figure 6). The Flag tag is perfectly cleavable by the enzyme enterokinase. The FLAG tag is made up of 8 amino acids and works well for low-abundance proteins. It is hydrophilic, so it will most likely not interfere with protein folding and function of the target protein. The Strep tag is also made up of 8 amino acids that will not disturb the protein’s functions. We chose the FLAG tag because it is perfectly cleavable. Info on LL-37 and N-terminus? The protein will be purified in a Strep-Tactin® Sepharose® column. In order to address the L-DOPA adhesive L-DOPA component, our final step is to elute with a base to reduce the amount of the anti-biofouling peptide that sticks to the column due to L-DOPA adhesion (Figure 7).
Flag Tag Sequence: Asp-Tyr-Lys-Asp-Asp-Asp-Asp-Lys
Strep Tag Sequence: Sequence: Trp-Ser-His-Pro-Gln-Phe-Glu-Lys
|
"
Phone: 203.432.3783
igem@yale.edu 
