Team:Vanderbilt/Project/Requirements
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
<li> See the Collaborations section of our Project page </li><br> | <li> See the Collaborations section of our Project page </li><br> | ||
<i>iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team's scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM). We encourage thoughtful and creative approaches, and those that draw on past Policy & Practice (formerly Human Practices) activities.</i>: <br> | <i>iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team's scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM). We encourage thoughtful and creative approaches, and those that draw on past Policy & Practice (formerly Human Practices) activities.</i>: <br> | ||
- | <li> See our Project page, especially noting how our genomic extraction approach, which has virtually never been done before by a manufacturing-division iGEM team, adds several unique areas of relevance to applying our approach to rare and endangered species, as well as the implications using natural versus synthesized genes has on considerations of intellectual property rights in light of the recent supreme court ruling <i> Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics </i> which | + | <li> See our Project page, especially noting how our genomic extraction approach, which has virtually never been done before by a manufacturing-division iGEM team, adds several unique areas of relevance to applying our approach to rare and endangered species, as well as the implications using natural versus synthesized genes has on considerations of intellectual property rights in light of the recent supreme court ruling <i> Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics </i> which established that isolated natural DNA sequences cannot be patented yet those synthesized artificially can. </li> |
Revision as of 03:23, 18 October 2014
|
Medal RequirementsBronzeTeam Registration:Complete Judging Form: Create and share a Description of the team's project using the iGEM wiki and the team's parts using the Registry of Standard Biological Parts: The description of each project must clearly attribute work done by the students and distinguish it from work done by others, including host labs, advisors, instructors, sponsors, professional website designers, artists, and commercial services: Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device used in your project/central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines). Please note you must submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry. Please see the Registry help page on adding new parts. A new application and/or outstanding documentation (quantitative data showing the Part's/ Device's function) of a previously existing BioBrick part also counts: SilverExperimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected.:Document the characterization of this part in the Main Page section of that Part's/Device's Registry entry: iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Articulate at least one question encountered by your team, and describe how your team considered the(se) question(s) within your project. Include attributions to all experts and stakeholders consulted: GoldImprove the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year), enter this information in the Registry. Please see the Registry help page on how to document a contribution to an existing part.:Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.: iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team's scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM). We encourage thoughtful and creative approaches, and those that draw on past Policy & Practice (formerly Human Practices) activities.: |