Team:UCSC/Bioethics

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 02:41, 18 October 2014

Our bioethics team is worked on researching the potential socio-economic, environmental, and safety concerns of iGEM projects.

Come of our bioethics members came to tour the lab space.
From left to right, Matthew Waldron, Manuel Avalos, both undergraduates,
and our Ethics Advisor Professor Sandra Dreisbach
Not pictured are our Philosophy post-grad James Sutter and undergraduate researcher Breeann Macdonald

The bioethics team examined the ethical dimensions of our iGem research project. Throughout the process undergraduate ethics students and the faculty ethics advisor worked as a part of the iGem team and discussed with the team ongoing ethical nuances of the project. This allowed our team to not just look at the ethical goals of the research but also to have an interdisciplinary perspective of the work throughout the development process from start to finish. Unlike typical ethical assessments where ethics is a judgment of the research after the fact, our ethical work was a part of conducting the research itself.

Bioethics Team work at UCSC Meetup

Part of the goal of the bioethics team was to help engage the larger iGem community in the ethical issues involved in their research and with the larger values involved with undergraduate research and iGem. As a part of addressing this we hosted several guest talks around ethics at our meetup including presentations by Lynn Rothchild, David Bernick and Rebecca DuBois. We also engaged everyone in the meetup in discussing ethical concerns raised after the talks with an ethics panel discussion with featured guest lecturers and faculty ethics advisor Sandra Dreisbach. Student iGem particpants posed engaging questions to the panel and an open discussion of ethical issues in their research and iGem took place. We also asked student participants to participate in anonymous survey inquiring on how they felt about ethics and synthetic biology in general and the ethical value of their research in particular. Some of the results of these surveys are discussed in Matthew Waldron's research article below

Bioethics Team Research Articles

Manuel Avalos article

Breeann MacDonald article

Matthew Waldron article

@@ Line 208: / Line 208: @@
 <br>
-<p style= "padding-left: 15px"><font color= "SteelBlue"><font size = "3"><b> Our bioethics team is hard at work researching the potential socio-economic, environmental, and safety concerns of iGEM projects.</b></p>
+<p style= "padding-left: 15px"><font color= "SteelBlue"><font size = "3"><b> Our bioethics team is worked on researching the potential socio-economic, environmental, and safety concerns of iGEM projects.</b></p>
 <br>
@@ Line 217: / Line 217: @@
 <br>
-<p style= "padding-left: 15px"><font color= "SteelBlue"><font size = "3">The bioethics team examined the ethical dimensions of our iGem research project.  Throughout the process undergraduate ethics students and faculty ethics advisor worked as a part of the iGem team and discussed with team ongoing ethical nuances of the project. This allowed to not just look at the ethical goals of the research and team but also to have an interdisciplinary perspective of the work throughout the development process from start to end.  Unlike typical ethical assessments where ethics is a judgment of the research after the fact, our ethical work was a part of conducting the research itself.</p>
+<p style= "padding-left: 15px"><font color= "SteelBlue"><font size = "3">The bioethics team examined the ethical dimensions of our iGem research project.  Throughout the process undergraduate ethics students and the faculty ethics advisor worked as a part of the iGem team and discussed with the team ongoing ethical nuances of the project. This allowed our team to not just look at the ethical goals of the research but also to have an interdisciplinary perspective of the work throughout the development process from start to finish.  Unlike typical ethical assessments where ethics is a judgment of the research after the fact, our ethical work was a part of conducting the research itself.</p>
+<br>
+<p style= "padding-left: 15px"><font color= "SteelBlue"><font size = "3">Bioethics Team work at UCSC Meetup </p>
+<p style= "padding-left: 15px"><font color= "SteelBlue"><font size = "3">Part of the goal of the bioethics team was to help engage the larger iGem community in the ethical issues involved in their research and with the larger values involved with undergraduate research and iGem.  As a part of addressing this we hosted several guest talks around ethics at our meetup including presentations by Lynn Rothchild, David Bernick and Rebecca DuBois.  We also engaged everyone in the meetup in discussing ethical concerns raised after the talks with an ethics panel discussion with featured guest lecturers and faculty ethics advisor Sandra Dreisbach.  Student iGem particpants posed engaging questions to the panel and an open discussion of ethical issues in their research and iGem took place.  We also asked student participants to participate in anonymous survey inquiring on how they felt about ethics and synthetic biology in general and the ethical value of their research in particular.  Some of the results of these surveys are discussed in Matthew Waldron's research article below</p>
+<br>
+<p style= "padding-left: 15px"><font color= "SteelBlue"><font size = "3">Bioethics Team Research Articles </p>
+<p style= "padding-left: 15px"><font color= "SteelBlue"><font size = "3">Manuel Avalos article</p>
+<p style= "padding-left: 15px"><font color= "SteelBlue"><font size = "3">Breeann MacDonald article</p>
+<p style= "padding-left: 15px"><font color= "SteelBlue"><font size = "3">Matthew Waldron article</p>