Team:Warwick/Modelling
From 2014.igem.org
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
<li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Interlab"> INTERLAB </a> </li> | <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Interlab"> INTERLAB </a> </li> | ||
<li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Attributions"> ATTRIBUTIONS </a> </li> | <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Attributions"> ATTRIBUTIONS </a> </li> | ||
- | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 02:16, 18 October 2014
OVERVIEW
Modelling is the most useful tool in a synthetic biologist’s toolbox. It allows us to experiment, without actually conducting experiments, something I’m sure every biologist wishes for. By use of computer programs and mathematics it is entirely possible to simulate a system in an artificial environment.
But why would we want to model?
Quite simply, it allows us to optimise our system under various circumstances and as a result could lead to potential cost savings in wetlab tests. For instance, what if you wanted to know how well GFP grows with respect to temperature. By modelling, we can save time and determine an answer rather quickly as opposed to waiting overnight for cultures to grow,etc.
How does modelling fit in with our project?
So we’ve discussed an overview, but I’m sure you all want to know how modelling fits into our project. We took the following approach with the modelling:
- We modelled individual experiments to directly relate results obtained from them and fit them to make our models more accurate enabling further predictions to be made.
- Upon discovering that the leading method to treat Ebola is synthetic targeted-siRNA drugs, and the similarities that this bears with our system, we also took an epidemiological approach and examined the dynamics of widespread infections on a macro level as opposed to the cellular level previously explored.
Ultimately, the overall aim of our modelling efforts is to develop a model that enables us to take control of replication. This would allow anyone in the future who is exploring this method of information propagation to take our model, and with a few tweaks, be able to apply it to their system. This re-usability was at the core of our modelling ethos. We wanted to create something that wasn’t just specific to us but something that would help further iGEM teams and potentially academics.
How did we go about modelling?
In order to model, we made use of the mathematicians and physicist on our team. Together they compiled some rather complex mathematics and constructed several types of models. We took both deterministic and stochastic approaches but also introduced time-delay into our systems, something that we noticed iGEM teams failed to incorporate in the past. Time delays do complicate our model, but it adds a greater depth to its realism because it is an unreasonable assumption to make that everything occurs instantaneously; RdRp has to bind to the RNA and then travel along it, this doesn’t occur straight away. We also used multi-dimensional PDE systems when exploring the epidemiology of Ebola.
Primarily, we used MATLAB as our software of choice, but also used Mathematica and Origin when fitting experimental data. As we decided to explore modelling avenues previously unexplored by iGEM teams, we decided to create our own ToolBox of solvers using . This would enable future iGEM teams to develop more realistic models of their systems without fear of struggling how to solve them or obtain results. Again we wanted to make sure that we left a legacy with regards to modelling, enabling teams to become better equipped in this field.