Team:INSA-Lyon/Results

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 151: Line 151:
           </ul>
           </ul>
 +
   
     <li><a href="#contenu3" onclick="$('#contenu3').slideToggle('slow')"><h1><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d5/Insa_fleche_titre.png" width="20px" />Survival after UV and high temperature exposure</h1></a><hr/></li>
     <li><a href="#contenu3" onclick="$('#contenu3').slideToggle('slow')"><h1><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d5/Insa_fleche_titre.png" width="20px" />Survival after UV and high temperature exposure</h1></a><hr/></li>
           <ul id="contenu3" style="list-style-type: none !important;display:none;">
           <ul id="contenu3" style="list-style-type: none !important;display:none;">
Line 158: Line 159:
<div align="justify">
<div align="justify">
<p>
<p>
-
To adress biosafety issues linked with GMOs, we worked on destroying our bacteria after letting them grow in a biofilm. As the captured metal is extracellular and Curli proteins are very resistant to environmental changes, live bacteria are not needed for our biofilter. Our goal was to obtain a biomaterial made out of modified Curli able to chelate nickel.  
+
To adress biosafety issues linked with GMOs, we worked on destroying our bacteria after letting them grow in a biofilm. As the captured metal is extracellular and Curli proteins are very resistant to environmental changes, alive bacteria are not needed for our biofilter. Our goal was to obtain a biomaterial made out of modified Curli able to chelate nickel.  
</p> </br>
</p> </br>
<p>
<p>
-
To find the best way to degrade bacteria and DNA, the following protocol was used to test the influence of UV light and temperature separately : </br>
+
In order to find the best way to degrade bacteria and DNA, the following protocol was used to test the influence of UV light and temperature separately : </br>
<ul>
<ul>
-
<li> Wells containing M63 cultures of strain 227 were put under UV light or at 60 or 70°C for different lengths of time. Well contents were then gradually transferred into Eppendorf and diluted (100, 300, 900 and 2700 fold).</li>  
+
<li> Wells containing M63 cultures of strain 227 were put under UV light or exposed to heat treatments (at 60 or 70°C) for different lengths of time. Well contents were then gradually transferred into Eppendorfs and diluted (100, 300, 900 and 2700 fold).</li>  
-
<li> LB plates (without antibiotic) corresponding to UV/temperature exposure times (+ one plate for control) were then spotted with s227 different concentrations in order to be able to count survival bacteria after incubation at 37°C.</li>
+
<li> LB plates (without antibiotic) corresponding to UV/temperature exposure times (+ one plate for control) were then spotted with different concentrations of strain 227 in order to be able to count bacterial survival after incubation at 37°C.</li>
-
<li> Genomic DNA was extracted from s227 concentrated culture. From the solution obtained, Curli promoter(750 bp) was amplified by PCR with Q5 polymerase and designed primers. </li>
+
<li> Genomic DNA was extracted from strain 227 concentrated culture. From the solution obtained, Curli promoter(750 bp) was amplified by PCR with Q5 polymerase and designed primers. </li>
-
<li>Epifluorescence observations were made after Back Light coloration with 200µL s227 liquid cultures.</li>
+
<li>Epifluorescence observations were made after Back Light coloration of 227 strain liquid cultures.</li>
</ul>
</ul>
</p>
</p>
Line 197: Line 198:
</br>
</br>
</table></div></br>
</table></div></br>
-
No bacteria grew on LB plate after 15 minutes UV light exposure.</br>&rArr; <b>Bacterian growth can be stopped this way. </b></p></br>
+
No bacteria grew on LB plates after 15 minutes UV light exposure.</br>&rArr; <b>Bacterial growth can be stopped this way. </b></p></br>
<p><div align="center"><i> DNA extraction</i></div></p>
<p><div align="center"><i> DNA extraction</i></div></p>
Line 205: Line 206:
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
   <td><div align="center"><figcaption> PCR gel after UV time exposure </figcaption></div></td>
+
   <td><div align="center"><figcaption> PCR gel after UV exposure </figcaption></div></td>
</tr>
</tr>
-
</table> </div></br> Bacterian DNA seemed to be degraded after 10 min UV light exposure.</br>&rArr; <b>In consequence, UV light can be used to destroy DNA.</b> </p></br>
+
</table> </div></br> Bacterial DNA seemed to be degraded after 10 min UV light exposure.</br>&rArr; <b>In consequence, UV light can be used to destroy DNA.</b> </p></br>
Line 249: Line 250:
</tr>
</tr>
</table></div></br>  
</table></div></br>  
-
Bacteria grew on LB plates even 45 min after being heated to 60°C. </br>&rArr; <b>60°C isn't enough high to kill bacteria.</b></p></br>
+
Bacteria grew on LB plates even 45 min after being heated at 60°C. </br>&rArr; <b>60°C isn't enough high to kill bacteria.</b></p></br>
<p>So we tried experiments with a temperature of 70°C.</p> </br>
<p>So we tried experiments with a temperature of 70°C.</p> </br>
Line 273: Line 274:
</tr>
</tr>
</table></div></br>
</table></div></br>
-
No more bacteria on LB plate after 15min at 70°C<br/> &rArr;<b>Bacterian growth can be stopped as well as with UV light.</b></p></br>
+
No more bacteria grew on LB plates after 15min at 70°C<br/> &rArr;<b>Bacterial growth can be stopped as well as with UV light.</b></p></br>
<p><div align="center"><i>DNA extraction</i></div></p>
<p><div align="center"><i>DNA extraction</i></div></p>
Line 281: Line 282:
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
   <td><div align="center"><figcaption>PCR gel after DNA extraction from bacterian culture exposed to 70°C</figcaption></div></td>
+
   <td><div align="center"><figcaption>PCR gel after DNA extraction from bacterial culture exposed to heat treatment with 70°C</figcaption></div></td>
</tr>
</tr>
</table></div> </br>
</table></div> </br>
-
No DNA degradation at all.<br/>&rArr; <b>In consequence, temperature doesn't enable to destroy DNA, in contrary to UV light.</b> </p><br/>
+
No DNA degradation at all.<br/>&rArr; <b>In consequence, unlike UV light,  temperature treatment doesn't destroy DNA.</b> </p><br/>
<p><div align="center"><i>Backlight</i></div></p></br>
<p><div align="center"><i>Backlight</i></div></p></br>
Line 306: Line 307:
No difference of coloration was observed between the control and the samples heated at 70°C : indeed a lot of green-colored bacteria remained after 45 min of heating.<br/>&rArr; <b>Temperature isn’t enough to kill bacteria just like UV light.</b></p></br>
No difference of coloration was observed between the control and the samples heated at 70°C : indeed a lot of green-colored bacteria remained after 45 min of heating.<br/>&rArr; <b>Temperature isn’t enough to kill bacteria just like UV light.</b></p></br>
-
<p> To solve this last problem, bacteria were put in contact with ethanol absolute. The Backlight coloration gives the following picture. </br>  
+
<p> To solve this last problem, bacteria were put in contact with 70% ethanol. The Backlight coloration gives the following picture. </br>  
<p><div align="center"><table>
<p><div align="center"><table>
Line 313: Line 314:
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
   <td><div align="center">Backlight after DNA extraction of bacterian culture exposed to ethanol<figcaption></figcaption></div></td>
+
   <td><div align="center">Backlight after DNA extraction of bacterial culture exposed to ethanol<figcaption></figcaption></div></td>
</tr>
</tr>
</table></div></p></br>
</table></div></p></br>
-
<p>These numerous experiments lead us to developp a protocol in three steps, illustrated by the drawing below :</br>
+
<p>These numerous experiments lead us to develop a protocol in three steps, illustrated by the drawing below :</br>
<div align="center"><table>
<div align="center"><table>
<tr>
<tr>
Line 328: Line 329:
</li>
</li>
           </ul>
           </ul>
 +

Revision as of 01:32, 18 October 2014

Curly'on - IGEM 2014 INSA-LYON

  • Curli characterization


  • Nickel chelation


  • Survival after UV and high temperature exposure


  • Promoter optimization and characterization