Team:Cooper Union/Biohack project

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
Line 123: Line 123:
             <span>Projects</span>
             <span>Projects</span>
         </a>
         </a>
-
         <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Cooper_Union/Safety" class="red" >
+
         <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Cooper_Union/Social" class="red" >
-
             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b2/CU_2014_logoS.png" height="100" style="vertical-align: top;" title="Safety" />
+
             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b2/CU_2014_logoS.png" height="100" style="vertical-align: top;" title="Social" />
             <span>Social</span>
             <span>Social</span>
         </a>
         </a>

Latest revision as of 00:42, 18 October 2014

Cooper Union 2014 iGEM




The Biohacker Kit


The premise of this project was to create a linked two plasmid system to create a bio-system whose inputs and outputs can be easily swapped. The purpose of this system is to create a means by which students can be easily introduced to synthetic biology (the design and re-design of biological systems for useful purposes) in their classrooms without the need for high-tech, expensive equipment.

How It Works


The system uses two different types of plasmids (pACYC184 as the input plasmid and pBR322 as the output plasmid). The input plasmid had the promoter gene along with a phage activator ligated into it, and the reporter promoter had a phage promoter and a reporter gene ligated into it. When the promoter is activated, it will trigger the phage activator. The phage activator will then activate the phage promoter in the output plasmid, which will turn on the output gene. In this way, there could be a whole palate of input and output plasmids that can be mixed and matched at the students' will to easily create their own individual systems. The two plasmids have different antibiotic resistances so that one can tell when their programmed plasmids have been successfully transformed into cells, along with different origins of replication. Using two different antibiotic resistances will help ensure that the colonies have both plasmids co-transformed inside the E. coli cells.


Figure 1: Two plasmid system, using the UV promoter as an input and GFP as the output


The Biohacker Kit would be a box that schools could buy that contained all of the input and output constructs. The lab work involved would be to co-transform the input and output of the student's choice with E. coli cells, and plate them on the correct antibiotic plates. After overnight incubation, the students can see all of the colonies and then activate the promoter to kick-start the system. Then, depending on the promoter, over the next day or two the system will begin to express the reporter gene! Students will also have the ability to monitor the system to see how the gene expression varies with time.

Results


Our composite part (BBa_K1354000) uses the sulA promoter (biobricked by UT-Tokyo in 2011 - BBa_K518010), and the delta activator from phiR73 phage (biobricked by Cambridge in 2007 - BBa_I746352). The phage activator turned on a phage promoter with a GFP reporter composite part, BBa_I746321. The two composite parts were in separate plasmids. When shocked with UV, the UV promoter was turned on, which activated the phage activator. This then turned the phage promoter on which activated the GFP reporter. The fluorescence readings are shown below.

Fluorescence Intensity for Three Colonies of UV+GFP and Controls
LB ControlLB UVUV ControlUV UVGFP ControlGFP UVJoint Contorl 1Joint Control 2Joint Control 3UV + GFP 1UV + GFP 2UV + GFP 3
Concentration (OD600)0.8020.1860.7130.3570.7330.2890.4060.4690.5660.1030.3460.141
GFP (485/520nm)1788106516861273215312741413813169205666216265859659
Normalized GFP222957252364356529374408348222807836335603497683568503



Figure 1: Fluorescence Intensity for Three Colonies of UV+GFP and Controls

Future Work


We built our system with restriction sites around the UV promoter and GFP reporter so that they can be cut out and replaced with other inputs and outputs easily. Going forward, we hope to create an entire kit, consisting of at least four more inputs and four more outputs. Any input or output can be used from the BioBrick registry, as long as primers are designed to incorporate the correct restriction enzyme sites.

Figure 2: The dual plasmid reporter system, demonstrating variable input/output options



References


  1. Chang AC, Cohen SN. (1978) Construction and characterization of amplifiable multicopy DNA cloning vehicles derived from the P15A cryptic miniplasmid. J. Bacteriol. 134(3):1141-56
  2. Paulina Balbás, Xavier Soberón, Enrique Merino, Mario Zurita, Hilda Lomeli, Fernando Valle, Noemi Flores, Francisco Bolivar. (1988) Plasmid vector pBR322 and its special-purpose derivatives — a review.Gene 50(1–3): 3-40