Team:INSA-Lyon/Results
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
<h6>Adhesion test and curli production</h6> | <h6>Adhesion test and curli production</h6> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/0e/Adh%C3%A9rence.png" alt="Figure 1 : Engineered bacteria Percentage of adhesion"/> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/0e/Adh%C3%A9rence.png" align="center" alt="Figure 1 : Engineered bacteria Percentage of adhesion"/><br/> |
<b>Figure 1 : Engineered bacteria Percentage of adhesion</b><br/> | <b>Figure 1 : Engineered bacteria Percentage of adhesion</b><br/> | ||
<div align="justify"><i>csgA-</i>knockout <i>E.coli</i> strain was transformed with BBa_CsgA-WT (BBa_K1404006); BBa_CsgA-His1 (BBa_K1404007); BBa_CsgA-His2 (BBa_K1404008). The corresponding positive and negative controls are Wild-type <i>E.coli</i> curli producing strain transformed with with the empty vector and <i>csgA-</i>-knockout <i>E.coli</i> strain transformed with the empty vector respectively. </div><br/> | <div align="justify"><i>csgA-</i>knockout <i>E.coli</i> strain was transformed with BBa_CsgA-WT (BBa_K1404006); BBa_CsgA-His1 (BBa_K1404007); BBa_CsgA-His2 (BBa_K1404008). The corresponding positive and negative controls are Wild-type <i>E.coli</i> curli producing strain transformed with with the empty vector and <i>csgA-</i>-knockout <i>E.coli</i> strain transformed with the empty vector respectively. </div><br/> | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
<div align="justify">These results show that <b>the percentage of adhesion is similar between the strains containing the three parts and the positive control, thus tagged CsgA were still functional</b>. CsgA with one or two tags from the P70 promoter were sufficient to form thick biofilms. </div><br/> | <div align="justify">These results show that <b>the percentage of adhesion is similar between the strains containing the three parts and the positive control, thus tagged CsgA were still functional</b>. CsgA with one or two tags from the P70 promoter were sufficient to form thick biofilms. </div><br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/dc/Crystal_violet_2.png" alt="Figure 2 : Engineered bacteria Biofilm formation"/> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/dc/Crystal_violet_2.png" align="center" alt="Figure 2 : Engineered bacteria Biofilm formation"/><br/> |
<b>Figure 2 : Engineered bacteria Biofilm formation</b><br/> | <b>Figure 2 : Engineered bacteria Biofilm formation</b><br/> | ||
<div align=" justify ">The cells were grown as described as figure 1. </div><br/> | <div align=" justify ">The cells were grown as described as figure 1. </div><br/> | ||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
< br/> | < br/> | ||
<div align="justify">Violet crystal staining shows that <b>the strain containing the three parts could form a biofilm like the positive control, thus tagged CsgA were still functional</b>. CsgA with one or two tags from the P70 promoter were sufficient to form thick biofilms. </div><br/> | <div align="justify">Violet crystal staining shows that <b>the strain containing the three parts could form a biofilm like the positive control, thus tagged CsgA were still functional</b>. CsgA with one or two tags from the P70 promoter were sufficient to form thick biofilms. </div><br/> | ||
- | <img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/81/Congo_Red_2.png" alt="Figure 3 : Engineered bacteria curli production"/> | + | <img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/81/Congo_Red_2.png" align="center" alt="Figure 3 : Engineered bacteria curli production"/><br/> |
<b>Figure 3 : Engineered bacteria curli production</b><br/> | <b>Figure 3 : Engineered bacteria curli production</b><br/> | ||
<div align="justify">Strains are the same as in figure 1. </div><br/> | <div align="justify">Strains are the same as in figure 1. </div><br/> |
Revision as of 19:16, 17 October 2014