Team:INSA-Lyon/Results
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
<ul id="contenu1" style="list-style-type: none !important;display:none;"> | <ul id="contenu1" style="list-style-type: none !important;display:none;"> | ||
<li><p> | <li><p> | ||
- | <h5>Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Analyzes</ | + | <h5><div align="center"> <b>Curli formation and adherence properties conferred by the 3 constructs CsgA-WT, CsgA-His1 and CsgA-His2</b></div><br/></h5> |
+ | <div align="justify">4 complementary tests were performed to evaluate the ability of the modified cells to assemble functional curli: 1) determination of the percentage of adherent cells to polystyrene in 24 wells-plates, 2) crystal violet staining of biofilm formed on polystyrene in 24 wells-plates, 3) ability to bind the congo red, 4) biofilm maximum thickness measurement and biovolumes quantification of GFP-tagged biofilm observed with a confocal microscopy and 5) curli structure observation using Transcription Electron Microscopy (MET).</div> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <h6>Adhesion test and curli production</h6> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/0e/Adh%C3%A9rence.png" alt="Figure 1 : Engineered bacteria Percentage of adhesion"/> | ||
+ | <b>Figure 1 : Engineered bacteria Percentage of adhesion</b><br/> | ||
+ | <div align="justify"><i>csgA-</i>knockout <i>E.coli</i> strain was transformed with BBa_CsgA-WT (BBa_K1404006); BBa_CsgA-His1 (BBa_K1404007); BBa_CsgA-His2 (BBa_K1404008). The corresponding positive and negative controls are Wild-type <i>E.coli</i> curli producing strain transformed with with the empty vector and <i>csgA-</i>-knockout <i>E.coli</i> strain transformed with the empty vector respectively. </div><br/> | ||
+ | <div align="justify">Strains with our parts, the positive and negative controls were cultivated in 24-wells microplate in M63 Mannitol during 24H at 30°C. The supernatant was removed and the OD600 measured, then the bacteria forming the biofilm were resuspended and the OD600 measured in order to estimate the number of cells (See protocol for more details). The percentage of adhesion was calculated as follow : </div><br/> | ||
+ | <div align="center"> (OD600 of the biofilm)/ (OD600 of the supernatant + OD600 of the biofilm) </div><br/> | ||
+ | <div align="justify">Significant differences are indicated using uppercase letters, and different letters indicate significant differences (Tukey’s test, p < 0.05) </div><br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <div align="justify">These results show that <b>the percentage of adhesion is similar between the strains containing the three parts and the positive control, thus tagged CsgA were still functional</b>. CsgA with one or two tags from the P70 promoter were sufficient to form thick biofilms. </div><br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/dc/Crystal_violet_2.png" alt="Figure 2 : Engineered bacteria Biofilm formation"/> | ||
+ | <b>Figure 2 : Engineered bacteria Biofilm formation</b><br/> | ||
+ | <div align=" justify ">The cells were grown as described as figure 1. </div><br/> | ||
+ | <div align="justify">The supernatant was removed and the remaining biofilm was fixed to the microplate by heat treatment at 80°C during 1H. The violet crystal solution was added in each well in order to stain the cells and the wells were washed with water to remove crystal violet in excess (See protocol for more details). </div><br/> | ||
+ | < br/> | ||
+ | <div align="justify">Violet crystal staining shows that <b>the strain containing the three parts could form a biofilm like the positive control, thus tagged CsgA were still functional</b>. CsgA with one or two tags from the P70 promoter were sufficient to form thick biofilms. </div><br/> | ||
+ | <img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/81/Congo_Red_2.png" alt="Figure 3 : Engineered bacteria curli production"/> | ||
+ | <b>Figure 3 : Engineered bacteria curli production</b><br/> | ||
+ | <div align="justify">Strains are the same as in figure 1. </div><br/> | ||
+ | <div align="justify">Strains with our parts, the positive and negative control were cultivated in M63 Mannitol at 30°C and 180rpm. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed and the cell pellet was resuspended in the Congo Red solution, in order to specifically stain the curli. The samples were centrifuged again and the pellets observed (See protocol for more details). </div><br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <div align="justify">Congo Red staining shows that <b>the CsgA with one or two tag from the P70 promoter allows to form curli fiber</b> which are able to bind congo red. </div><br/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <h6>Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Analyzes</h6> | ||
<div align="justify"><p><br/>For the Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy biofilm acquisitions, all the strains were cultivated in 96-wells microplate in M63 Mannitol during 16H at 30°C (<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7e/Culture_confocal_analyse.pdf">See Protocol for details</a>). See results in <b>Figure 4</b>.</p> | <div align="justify"><p><br/>For the Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy biofilm acquisitions, all the strains were cultivated in 96-wells microplate in M63 Mannitol during 16H at 30°C (<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7e/Culture_confocal_analyse.pdf">See Protocol for details</a>). See results in <b>Figure 4</b>.</p> | ||
Revision as of 19:12, 17 October 2014