Team:Virtus-Parva Mexico/Notebook
From 2014.igem.org
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> | <td> | ||
- | <div style="margin-left: | + | <div style="margin-left: 120px;"> |
<ul><li>2.703 g FeCl<sub>3</sub> 6H<sub>2</sub>O</li> | <ul><li>2.703 g FeCl<sub>3</sub> 6H<sub>2</sub>O</li> | ||
<li>0.999 g FeCl<sub>2</sub> 4H<sub>2</sub>O</li> | <li>0.999 g FeCl<sub>2</sub> 4H<sub>2</sub>O</li> |
Revision as of 18:49, 17 October 2014
Notebooks
Inorganic Notebook
|
|
03/07/2014
04/07/2014
|
|
07/07/2014
SiO2, n = 1.46 2.42 + 1.46 = 3.15 08/07/2014
| |
09/07/2014
10/07/2014
|
|
11/07/2014The samples were once again washed with water, these samples easily precipitated in water, contrary to previous samples. Code names for these samples were NB2_(1-3) To help the precipitation, a little amount of acetone was added, this was also done for sample SB2’s aliquots. The samples were magnetically decanted and dried under vacuum for 4 hours. |
|
15/07/14Samples were taken of pure magnetite, silanized magnetite (NB2) and magnetite coated with silica and silane (SB2_1 and SB2_3) for its characterization in IR for solids. Comparing the spectra given by the IR of the pure magnetite and silanized magnetite (SB2 and NB2) we were able to distinguish a peak at 990.2 cm-1 corresponding to a Si-O bond, confirming the correct silanization of the magnetite, although the amino group couldn’t be identified. Similar results were achieved for samples SB2_1 and SB2_3, however, this peak was not decisive to know if the sample was correctly functionalized giving the fact that the samples are coated with silica. |
Biology Notebook
29/05/2014For the first day of wetlab, we prepared the solutions we would use throughout our project.
After, we prepared a solution of EDTA 0.5 M by adding 3.65 grams in 25 mL of water. The Tris 1M solution took 3.02 grams in 25 mL water. These would be further diluted later on. A mistake was made within the calculations, a redo would have to be performed. The correct amount of EDTA and Tris were weighed and left for later. The day lasted longer than anticipated, the task list involved:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30/05/2014After the Tris hydration, a pH of 6.55 was obtained. What was to follow was to achieve a pH of 8 by neutralizing with NaOH.
Sudden realization came when the pHmeter was reviewed; it wasn’t working, so the pH was, in fact, much higher than the one figured on display. The next step was to acidify by dropwise adding of HCl.
In order to dissolve the EDTA in water, it was needed to raise the pH up to 8 (it was at 3.83)
The first of many sterilizations took place (1 box of blue tips, 1 box of yellow tips, TE Buffer and EDTA
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
03/06/2014DNA extraction of E. Coli began:
The vacuum chamber was cleaned with EtOH and kept under UV light for 20 minutes. To each tube, 567 µl of TE and 30 µl of proteinase K 20 mg/ml were added. This was incubated in oven at 37 °C for an hour, then placed in the refrigerator 09/06/2014As proteinase K supply was running low, a distinct method had to be pursued.
The to-do list for the following day was as follows:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10/06/2014Part of the team centrifuged a day before. Re-centrifugation lasted for 10 minutes. The supernatant was cleared off. The Epperndorfs were left to dry out for about half an hour. After adding 0.5 ml of TE and two volumes of absolute EtOH, the DNA strings were not visible. We centrifuged at 1300 rpm, then a volume of 50 µl TE was added to ‘A’ labelled tubes and 200 µl to ‘B’ labelled tubes. We added DNA extracted with the first protocol to the ‘A’ labelled tubes and these were re-labelled ADN-1, labels of C-1 and C-2 were conscripted.
Electrophoresis was run on DNA to check in indeed DNA was present.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/06/2014Ran electrophoresis over 80 V for approximately an hour and a half. 07/08/2014The protein finally arrived. WetLab time was on the go. We re-suspended the protein and prepared EDTA and Tris/acetate.
Magnetite was dispersed in anhydric toluene followed by the addition of the resuspended protein with some triethylamine and finally glutaraldehyde was added as a coupling agent 15/08/2014Alpha samples were divided into αG (G for glutaraldehyde) and αSG (without G), β samples were divided in the same way as α. Both G samples (α & β) were washed 3 times with PBS and some glutaraldehyde. The SG samples were both washed 3 times with pure PBS. UV spectra were taken for characterization. 19/08/2014Proceedings to prepare TAE for electrophoresis using TRIS, acetic acid and EDTA were performed. Agarose gel was prepared with distilled water and agarose, a loading buffer was prepared with glycerol at 10%. The electrophoresis revealing did not quite displayed desired results, a new run had to be made. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28/08/2014DNA extraction was performed anew:
01/09/2014Transformation and preparation of DH5α was done. CaCl2 was prepared to make competent cells. For a 200 ml solution, 54 grams of CaCl2 were added. Also, chloramphenicol was needed, 34 micrograms for each 250 microliters. 500 ml of LB broth was prepared with:
03/09/2014The protein was washed 3 times in PBS and sonicated for 10 minutes. The protein was then suspended in PBS and some magnetite was added. The samples were separated in four groups, those containing DNA and those without, and within them ones containing glutaraldehyde and the rest without. 04/09/2014Plasmid resuspension in 100 microliters TE or CaCl2 05/09/2014
E. coli was cultivated in 30ml of LB broth, then stirred and transferred into falcon tubes. Passed into the centrifuge and washed with cold CaCl2, resuspended and recentrifuged.
E.coli was transferred into vials and resuspended pGLO was added.
Some more E.coli was transferred into vials and resuspended pSB1C3 was added. All the tubes were placed in an ice tray and then left at room temperature. These were incubated at 37Cº for 30 minutes and some samples were taken from each tube to cultivate on Petri dishes. 09/09/2014
In the presence of ethanol it precipitates, it then was centrifuged and the supernatant disposed of. Resuspension on PBS followed and then passed onto an Eppendorf tube and finally adding some RNAse. 17/09/2014
Different dilutions of DNA were separated labeling samples as β and γ. These, as well, were divided with and without glutaraldehyde, and subsequently with and without DNA. We did some UV characterization for all the samples. All data was saved. 21/09/2014+pGLO was cultivated in LB. 24/09/20141ml of cultivated LB was dropped in Eppendorf tubes along with +pSBC13 25/09/2014Some washes with water of the β and γ samples, some PBS was put into the mixture as well. Original samples stay resuspended in water, and new samples are kept on the fridge. The samples for electrophoresis and for UV characterization were prepared. 26/09/2014
First, the transformation was made. For this, E.Coli was cultured in LB broth, stirred at 37Cº, transferred into a Falcon tube for centrifuging at 1500rpm 4°C during 10 minutes, and resuspended in CaCl2. Recentrifuged again and repeat. The suspension was left on ice for half an hour. Another centrifuging, and another resuspension, some sample was taken and passed into an Eppendorf tube containing +pGLO. Ice resting for another 30 minutes. Then, incubation in a stove at 37Cº.
The DNA in Eppendorf tubes was centrifuged, forcing it to precipitate, then the supernatant was removed and EtOH was added in order to centrifuge again. The tube was left to dry for a few hours. The tube with the DNA was added to a previously prepared solution of PBS and RNAse. Placed then into the thermoblock for about 15 minutes to finish incubation. Finally, the tubes were centrifuged one last time and the sample separated in two, having two different concentrations. 28/09/2014Some of the σ samples were prepared, one with glutaraldehyde and DNA-protein, another with glutaraldehyde and DNA; the third, with DNA-protein and the last one with DNA only. The ε samples were prepared likewise its σ counterparts. A and B samples were prepared with some nanoparticles. 30/09/2014The A10, E10, C10, B10 samples were ran in an agarose gel at 1% and prepared to an electrophoresis run. Performed tests
|