Team:INSA-Lyon/Results
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
<li><p> | <li><p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | < | + | <div align="justify">What about chelation ? <br/> |
- | + | <br/> | |
- | </ | + | Nickel(II) chelated for each of the constructions (Strain CsgA- with part BBa_K1404006, Strain CsgA- with part BBa_K1404007 and Strain CsgA- with part BBa_K1404008) is evaluated by using dimethylglyoxime (DMG) as the precipitating reagent. This is achieved by using absorbing properties of DMG-Ni(II) pink-colored complex (peak absorption at 554nm). <br/> |
- | + | <br/> | |
- | + | Firstly, a <b> calibration set </b> of Nickel and DMG was done. <br/> | |
- | < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
+ | Then, strains were assayed for biofilm nickel absorption on liquid cultures using the calibration set, after measuring the OD of the complex formed for each strain at 554nm.<br/> | ||
+ | This technique is more <b>qualitative</b> than quantitative due to the spectrometer precision. <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Here are the outcomes. </p><br/> | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/ea/Wikiphotogamme.png" alt="photo de la gamme" | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/ea/Wikiphotogamme.png" alt="photo de la gamme" | ||
- | width="600px"/> | + | width="600px"/> <br/> |
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/63/SetcalibrationDMG.png" alt="gamme graphe" | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/63/SetcalibrationDMG.png" alt="gamme graphe" | ||
- | width="600px"/> | + | width="600px"/> <br/> <br/> |
</div> | </div> | ||
- | + | Nickel-DMG complex colorimetry measurement follows a <b>linear regression</b> from a concentration of 20uM to 100uM, linked to the gradient from transparency (at [20uM]) to pink (at [100uM]). This visual method allows us to compare the Ni chelation between our strains. The more the color is pale, the more Ni has been chelated. That’s why, the complex formed with bacteria from strain CsgA- with part BBa_K1404008 is less colored than the others, chelating bacteria remained in the pellet with nickel fixed to their curlis.<br/> | |
+ | These results show that <b>the part BBa_K1404008 confers increased chelation</b> to strain CsgA-. It is shown that it chelates more than part BBa_K1404006 and part BBa_K1404007. <br/> | ||
- | + | <br/> | |
- | + | <br/> | |
- | + | A second method has been used, more <b>quantitative</b> and more precise: <b> mass spectrometry </b>assays have been realized. The quantity of chelated nickel for each strain has been compared to the quantity of curlis formed by each strain. | |
- | + | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Here are the results : <br/> | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/10/ICP.png" alt="ICP" | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/10/ICP.png" alt="ICP" | ||
width="500px"/> </div> | width="500px"/> </div> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
- | + | Taken together, these results show that the constructed Strain CsgA- with part BBa_K1404008 chelates twice more than strain CsgA- with part BBa_K1404007. That means that <b>two Histags on C-term are twice more effective </b> than one. Moreover, one histag allows a better chelation than none, but not a really significative one. Significant differences are indicated using lowercase letters, and different letters indicate significant differences (Tukey’s test, p < 0.05). Error bars represent standard deviations. | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
<br/> </div> | <br/> </div> |
Revision as of 13:46, 17 October 2014