"
Team:Hannover/Medals
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
<tr><td>a) Improve the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device. An "improvement" is anything that improves the functionality and ease-of-use of a part, so that it is more likely to be used by the community. "Characterization" is a measurement of a functional parameter of a part, preferably in absolute units, that can precisely and repeatably be performed in other labs. </td><td>The <a href:"https://2014.igem.org/Team:Hannover/Background_bioinformatics">codon usage</a> of the cellulose binding domain of the iGEM team Bielefeld was adopted to the use of <i>E.coli</i> and <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> and unwanted sites were erased by silent mutations .</td></tr> | <tr><td>a) Improve the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device. An "improvement" is anything that improves the functionality and ease-of-use of a part, so that it is more likely to be used by the community. "Characterization" is a measurement of a functional parameter of a part, preferably in absolute units, that can precisely and repeatably be performed in other labs. </td><td>The <a href:"https://2014.igem.org/Team:Hannover/Background_bioinformatics">codon usage</a> of the cellulose binding domain of the iGEM team Bielefeld was adopted to the use of <i>E.coli</i> and <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> and unwanted sites were erased by silent mutations .</td></tr> | ||
<tr><td>or</td></tr> | <tr><td>or</td></tr> | ||
| - | <tr><td>b) Help another team by e.g. characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.</td><td>/td></tr> | + | <tr><td>b) Help another team by e.g. characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.</td><td></td></tr> |
<tr><td>or</td></tr> | <tr><td>or</td></tr> | ||
<tr><td>c) iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe and evaluate an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions… </td><td></td></tr> | <tr><td>c) iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe and evaluate an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions… </td><td></td></tr> | ||
Revision as of 11:49, 17 October 2014
Meeting criteria for medals
On this page we list the criteria that have to be fullfilled to gain a bronze, silver or even a gold medal. Below we will explain, how we satisfied these criteria. Clicking on hooks redirects you to the corresponding page of our wiki.
Bronze medal
| Criteria | Our achievements |
| 1. Team registration |  |
| 2. Complete Judging form | |
| 3. Team Wiki | |
| 4. Poster and talk at the iGEM Jamboree | In progress |
| 5. Clearly attribution that project was done by students not advisors | |
| 6. At least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device used in your project/central to your project, submit this part to the iGEM Registry. A new application and/or outstanding documentation (quantitative data showing the Part’s/ Device’s function) of a previously existing BioBrick part also counts. | |
| Criteria | Our achievements |
| 1. All criteria concerning Bronze are fullfilled | Hopefully done :) |
| 2. Experimentally validation of one new and functional (as expected) BioBrick | |
| 3. Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry. | LINK ZU DEN ENTSPRECHENDEN SEITEN NACHTRAGEN |
| 4. Submission of this new part |  |
| 5. iGEM projects involve important questions e.g. relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Articulate at least one question encountered by your team, and describe how your team considered the(se) question(s) within your project. Include attributions to all experts and stakeholders consulted. | LINK ZU DEN ENTSPRECHENDEN SEITEN NACHTRAGEN |
Gold medal
| Criteria | Our achievements |
| 1. All criteria concerning Bronze and Silver, plus one or more from below | Hopefully achieved |
| a) Improve the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device. An "improvement" is anything that improves the functionality and ease-of-use of a part, so that it is more likely to be used by the community. "Characterization" is a measurement of a functional parameter of a part, preferably in absolute units, that can precisely and repeatably be performed in other labs. | The codon usage of the cellulose binding domain of the iGEM team Bielefeld was adopted to the use of E.coli and Arabidopsis thaliana and unwanted sites were erased by silent mutations . |
| or | |
| b) Help another team by e.g. characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system. | |
| or | |
| c) iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe and evaluate an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions… |
