Team:NTNU Trondheim/Judging

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 280: Line 280:
<div id="column-content"><span>Complete Judging form</span></div><img class="criteria" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/51/Checkbox_small.png"/><div class="criteria-answer"><a  href="https://igem.org/Judging_Form.cgi?id=1424">Judging form.</a></div><br><br>
<div id="column-content"><span>Complete Judging form</span></div><img class="criteria" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/51/Checkbox_small.png"/><div class="criteria-answer"><a  href="https://igem.org/Judging_Form.cgi?id=1424">Judging form.</a></div><br><br>
<div id="column-content"><span>Team wiki</span><img class="criteria" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/51/Checkbox_small.png"/><div class="criteria-answer"><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NTNU_Trondheim">Team wiki.</a> </div><br><br>
<div id="column-content"><span>Team wiki</span><img class="criteria" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/51/Checkbox_small.png"/><div class="criteria-answer"><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NTNU_Trondheim">Team wiki.</a> </div><br><br>
-
<div id="column-content"><img class="criteria" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/51/Checkbox_small.png"/><span>The description of each project must clearly attribute work done by the students and distinguish it</span> from work done by others, including host labs, advisors, instructors, sponsors, professional website designers, artists, and commercial services. </div><div class="criteria-answer"><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NTNU_Trondheim/Acknowledgements/Attributions"> </a> </div><br><br>
+
<div id="column-content"><img class="criteria" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/51/Checkbox_small.png"/><span>The description of each project must clearly attribute work done by the students and distinguish it</span> from work done by others, including host labs, advisors, instructors, sponsors, professional website designers, artists, and commercial services. </div><div class="criteria-answer">See our <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NTNU_Trondheim/Acknowledgements/Attributions">attributions</a> page. </div><br><br>
<div id="column-content"><img class="criteria" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/51/Checkbox_small.png"/><span>Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device</span> used in your project/central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).</div> <div class="criteria-answer">See <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1424000">BBa_K1424000</a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1424001">BBa_K1424001</a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1424002">BBa_K1424002</a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1424003">BBa_K1424003</a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1424004">BBa_K1424004</a> and <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1424005">BBa_K1424005</a>.</div><br>
<div id="column-content"><img class="criteria" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/51/Checkbox_small.png"/><span>Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device</span> used in your project/central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).</div> <div class="criteria-answer">See <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1424000">BBa_K1424000</a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1424001">BBa_K1424001</a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1424002">BBa_K1424002</a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1424003">BBa_K1424003</a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1424004">BBa_K1424004</a> and <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1424005">BBa_K1424005</a>.</div><br>
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 11:10, 17 October 2014

Team:NTNU_Trondheim/notebook - 2014.igem.org

 

Team:NTNU_Trondheim/Home

From 2014.igem.org

NTNU Genetically Engineered Machines

Judging Criteria

Bronze

Team registration


Complete Judging form


Team wiki

The description of each project must clearly attribute work done by the students and distinguish it from work done by others, including host labs, advisors, instructors, sponsors, professional website designers, artists, and commercial services.
See our attributions page.


Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device used in your project/central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).

Silver

Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your design and construction works as expected.

Two homologous recombination sequences for integration of specific DNA into a specified site within the genome via double homologous recombination were created and worked as expected (BBa_K1424000 and BBa_K1424001).

Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.


Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).

iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Articulate at least one question encountered by your team, and describe how your team considered the(se) question(s) within your project. Include attributions to all experts and stakeholders consulted.

See link.

Gold

Improve the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device and enter this information in the Registry.
Improved the function of a previously documented part ( BBa_K300989 ) to make it compatible with iGEM assembly standards RFC10, 12, 23, 25 and 1000 (the previous part was incompatible with all iGEM assembly standards), and also optimised the promoter and RBS for use in the host organism Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. New biobrick has the part number BBa_K1424003.


iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team’s scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM). We encourage thoughtful and creative approaches, and those that draw on past Policy & Practice (formerly Human Practices) activities.