Team:Sheffield/collaboration

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 134: Line 134:
</p>
</p>
</div>
</div>
-
<br><br>
+
<br>
<div class="section5">
<div class="section5">

Revision as of 19:22, 16 October 2014







COLLABORATION

MEET UPS

MEET UPS: Throughout the project we have embarked on many collaborations with teams on different aspects of our project. We kick-started our collaboration by attending the Oxford iGEM Meet Up on Thursday, 19th June 2014.. This was a great day with interesting talks from guest speakers giving us insight into the project. We were then able to meet the British and Irish iGEM teams attending over a poster session to establish links with one another. As it was early on in the project timeline, it was useful to see where projects were heading and also the variety of issues being tackled using synthetic biology.
From this, we decided to hold our own meet up on Friday, 18th July 2014, a month after the previous meet up. We felt that this would be a great time for us to solidify and identify specific areas and ideas on which we could collaborate with other teams as everyone had started their lab work by this point. We hosted 4 teams from across England: Kent, Norwich-UEA, Oxford and York and had a very successful day. Firstly, we had presentations from two guest speakers from the University of Sheffield: Professor Phillip C. Wright (link to bio on team page) (Head of Chemical and Biological Engineering) who spoke about his views and perceptions of the development of synthetic biology and Robert Meckin (Doctoral Researcher, Science and Technology Studies) who gave an insight into human practices surrounding synthetic biology. An icebreaker involving human bingo allowed us to find out more about each other before a poster session and finally, a more relaxed evening with drinks. We had a great time hosting the teams and hope they did too! Below is a video to show a summary of the events that took place:


Finally, we attended YSB 2.0 and UCL meet up held on Monday 1st – Tuesday 2nd September 2014 where we were given the opportunity to present a poster as well as presentation on the development of our project over the summer. It was great to see all of the hard work that teams had put in and boosted our excitement for the Giant Jamboree where we will be seeing all of the other presentations.


Edinburgh

During the course of the project we established contact and collaborative links with a number of different iGEM teams. For instance, with Team Edinburgh we were in touch regarding Human Practices. During skype meetings we discussed our HP project approaches and decided there how our inter-team collaboration would work. Team sheffield was interviewed by team edinburgh over a skype call regarding task management and role distribution within a team. On the other hand, we asked some questions about the different components of their HP work, so that we could incorporate them in the SocioBrick Registry of standard parts that we developed for iGEM. We considered the collaboration successful in that each team was able to get the necessary data from each other to carry on their individual work. We then had a chance to personally meet some members of team Edinburgh in the Young Synthetic Biology Conference in London which was a wonderful further learn about the work they had been invested in as a whole.



Valencia_UPV

To assess how good the Lab Notation we had developed was, we reached out to Team Valencia and asked if they would be interested in testing the notation for us according to the specific procedure we sent them. They were sent the notation key and 2 protocols written in the standardized lab notation format. The titles of the protocols were not included in this pack to ensure that the volunteers were only using the information provided to them. They were then asked to fill in a qualitative review assessing how they had found carrying out each of the protocols ( click here to see form). (link to the notation report). The information obtained in the review and Team Valencia’s suggestions were very beneficial for the final correction and testing the the new notation we developed.



Oxford

The Oxford iGEM Team were one of the first teams we established collaborative links with after the meet-up they held in Oxford. When we held our own meet-up in Sheffield, our teams agreed that there was an overlap in the aims of our project
Team Oxford were one of the first teams we established collaborative links with. After the University of Sheffield Meet-up organised by us, our teams felt their was an overlap in the way our teams worked and what we were addressing and therefore decided that if needed there were certain identified that we could definitely collaborate in. For instance in the beginning of the project our team was having trouble obtaining successful transformations of a certain promoter that we require and so asked if Oxford could try transforming it and see if they encountered the same problem. Oxford were very helpful and happy to do it. However, while this was taking place, our team troubleshooted what the problem had been.
Further down the line, Oxford started developing a stochastic modelling system. With that, they asked if we would be interested in giving them some info regarding the promoters we were testing with our lipase and copy number which we did to allow them to further improve their model.