Team:Toulouse/Result/experimental-results

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 211: Line 211:
<p class="texte">As we did previously, we tested this new system with fuchsin. This experiment was made with WT <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> and N-Acetylglucosamine.
<p class="texte">As we did previously, we tested this new system with fuchsin. This experiment was made with WT <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> and N-Acetylglucosamine.
<br><br>
<br><br>
-
<i>NB: We could not see the diffusion from one tube to the other. We made the hypothesis that it was not visible by sight because of by the small diameter of the capillary.  
+
<i>NB: We could not see the diffusion from one tube to the other. We made the hypothesis that it was not visible by sight because of the small diameter of the capillary.  
</i><br>
</i><br>
<br>
<br>
The following strategy was used to avoid disturbance due to pressure and liquid movement through the capillary:<br>
The following strategy was used to avoid disturbance due to pressure and liquid movement through the capillary:<br>
- The first step was the addition of Wash Buffer until the capillary was full to avoid the presence of air bubbles which could lead to diffusion problems.<br>
- The first step was the addition of Wash Buffer until the capillary was full to avoid the presence of air bubbles which could lead to diffusion problems.<br>
-
- Then, the tube 2 was plugged with the thumb while another person was adding the bacteria solution of WT Bacillus subtilis  in the tube 1. <br>
+
- Then, the tube 2 was plugged with the thumb while another person was adding the bacterial solution of WT <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> in the tube 1. <br>
-
- The tube 1 was also plugged and only after the thumb could be removed of the tube 2. <br>
+
- The tube 1 was also plugged and only after the thumb could be removed from the tube 2. <br>
- In the same way, the N-Acetylglucosamine was added in the tube 2. <br>
- In the same way, the N-Acetylglucosamine was added in the tube 2. <br>
- The same process was made with a xylose positive control.<br>
- The same process was made with a xylose positive control.<br>
Line 235: Line 235:
<p class="title2"> 5. Tips capillary system</p>
<p class="title2"> 5. Tips capillary system</p>
<p class="title3">First tips capillary system</p>
<p class="title3">First tips capillary system</p>
-
<p class="texte">This protocol comes from Imperial College iGEM team 2011 and was adapted by our team in several steps (See <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Toulouse/Notebook/Protocols#select8">chemotaxis protocol</a>).<br>
+
<p class="texte">This protocol comes from Imperial College iGEM team 2011 and was adapted by our team in several steps (See <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Toulouse/Notebook/Protocols#select8">chemotaxis protocol</a>).<br> PRINCIPE DU TEST
<br>
<br>
First of all, parafilm was used to close the tips:<br>
First of all, parafilm was used to close the tips:<br>
Line 247: Line 247:
<p class="texte">- After all the chemo-attractants were added in the tips, we put them on a green base to carry them. The whole process can be seen on Figure 10.<br>
<p class="texte">- After all the chemo-attractants were added in the tips, we put them on a green base to carry them. The whole process can be seen on Figure 10.<br>
-
- Each tip was put in 300 µL of a bacteria solution in the wells of an Elisa plate.<br></p>
+
- Each tip was immersed in 300 µL of a bacterial solution in the wells of an Elisa plate.<br></p>
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/05/Chemotaxis_-_tip_and_support.png"></center>
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/05/Chemotaxis_-_tip_and_support.png"></center>
Line 276: Line 276:
<p class="texte"><b>At that point, the protocol was approved and the final test could finally start! :-)</b><br>
<p class="texte"><b>At that point, the protocol was approved and the final test could finally start! :-)</b><br>
<br>
<br>
-
There was just one tiny problem… we did not have our optimized bacterium with the chemotaxis gene… That is why we concentrated our efforts on WT <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> strain.<br>
+
There was just one tiny problem… we did not have our optimized bacterium wtransformed with the chemotaxis module… That is why we concentrated our efforts on WT <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> strain.<br>
<br>
<br>
The main goal was to find an optimized control and to analyze the eventual chemotaxis of the WT strain. To avoid osmolality bias, we wanted to find a molecule which was non-attractant and with a similar molecular weight than the N-Acetylglucosamine (221.21 g/mol). Our first idea was to use fuchsin (Molecular weight: 337.85 g/mol).<br>
The main goal was to find an optimized control and to analyze the eventual chemotaxis of the WT strain. To avoid osmolality bias, we wanted to find a molecule which was non-attractant and with a similar molecular weight than the N-Acetylglucosamine (221.21 g/mol). Our first idea was to use fuchsin (Molecular weight: 337.85 g/mol).<br>
Line 299: Line 299:
<b><p class="texte">This incredible discovery destroyed all of our hopes about the God of chemotaxis! :-(</b><br>
<b><p class="texte">This incredible discovery destroyed all of our hopes about the God of chemotaxis! :-(</b><br>
<br>
<br>
-
However, our team did not give up on synthetic biology and on our strength! Indeed, after days of disappointment and no time left for lab work, we raised from ashes and tried to find another negative control.<br>
+
However, our team did not give up on synthetic biology ! Indeed, after days of disappointment and no time left for lab work, we raised from ashes and tried to find another negative control.<br>
<br>
<br>
We finally used galactose (25mM) as a negative control. The article Chemotaxis towards sugars by <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> (<i>George W. Ordal et al., 1979</i>) proved that it was a poor attractant.<br>
We finally used galactose (25mM) as a negative control. The article Chemotaxis towards sugars by <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> (<i>George W. Ordal et al., 1979</i>) proved that it was a poor attractant.<br>

Revision as of 14:42, 16 October 2014