Team:SJTU-Software/Requirement/Notebook
From 2014.igem.org
Line 457: | Line 457: | ||
<div class="container2" style="margin:-4% 0 0 0;height:750px;width:100%;float:left; display:inline" > | <div class="container2" style="margin:-4% 0 0 0;height:750px;width:100%;float:left; display:inline" > | ||
+ | <div class="container2" style="margin:-4% 0 0 0;height:750px;width:20%;float:left; display:inline" background-color:#64A6F0; > | ||
+ | <div class="container2" style="margin:-4% 0 0 0;height:750px;width:20%;float:left; display:inline" background-color:#64A60F; > | ||
+ | <div class="container2" style="margin:-4% 0 0 0;height:750px;width:60%;float:left; display:inline" background-color:#64A6FF; > | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
- | |||
Revision as of 08:20, 16 October 2014
Introduction
This is our time table;
2. Silver
3.Gold
In addition to the Bronze and Silver Medal requirements, two additional goals must be achieved:
1. Provide a convincing validation, testing the performance of the development -- experimentally (can be outsourced) or by other teams and users. Note, even if the algorithm or tool turns out not to work that well, the Gold requirement is fulfilled if the test is good and the analysis convincing. Validation may include: preferably experiments, informatics analysis (complexity, run time) of an algorithm, or user studies.
And the second goal can be any one of the following:
1. Make your software interact / interface with the Registry.
2. Re-use and further develop previous iGEM software projects (or parts thereof) or use and/or improvement of existing synthetic biology tools or frameworks.
3. Develop a well documented library or API for other developers (rather than “only” a stand-alone app for end users.)
4. iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team’s scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM). We encourage thoughtful and creative approaches, and those that draw on past Policy & Practice (formerly Human Practices) activities.