"
Team:Macquarie Australia/Outreach/SYTYCS
From 2014.igem.org
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
We believe that social media and popular formats of communication provide the potential to close this knowledge gap between academic audiences and the general public. By addressing this issue with an online Question and Answer contest, the Macquarie University team believes that: | We believe that social media and popular formats of communication provide the potential to close this knowledge gap between academic audiences and the general public. By addressing this issue with an online Question and Answer contest, the Macquarie University team believes that: | ||
| - | <ul | + | <ul> |
<li> | <li> | ||
| + | <p> | ||
The public can be equipped with up-to-date and accurate information regarding synthetic biology, addressing the failures of the media & scientists. It avoids the complex language of academic and philosophical journals, communicating the technical and ethical issues simply and effectively. | The public can be equipped with up-to-date and accurate information regarding synthetic biology, addressing the failures of the media & scientists. It avoids the complex language of academic and philosophical journals, communicating the technical and ethical issues simply and effectively. | ||
| + | </p> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
| + | </p> | ||
A conversation started on the public's terms is more comprehensible to ordinary people, and speaks directly to them and their concerns. By allowing the public to express and drive the conversation, the issues of primary interest to the public can be identified or allayed. | A conversation started on the public's terms is more comprehensible to ordinary people, and speaks directly to them and their concerns. By allowing the public to express and drive the conversation, the issues of primary interest to the public can be identified or allayed. | ||
| + | </p> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
| + | <p> | ||
Direct and open communication with academics servers a watchdog function, ensuring proper public oversight of areas of ethical concern, and encouraging scientific personnel also to consider the ethical and social consequences of synthetic biology. | Direct and open communication with academics servers a watchdog function, ensuring proper public oversight of areas of ethical concern, and encouraging scientific personnel also to consider the ethical and social consequences of synthetic biology. | ||
| + | </p> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
| + | <p> | ||
Our vision for regional forums prompts discussion of a broad range of cultural perspectives on issues of synthetic biology, and allows for those culturally versed in social and ethical issues of their region to address those concerns, in a manner not engaged in by Western, often secular, literature. | Our vision for regional forums prompts discussion of a broad range of cultural perspectives on issues of synthetic biology, and allows for those culturally versed in social and ethical issues of their region to address those concerns, in a manner not engaged in by Western, often secular, literature. | ||
| + | </p> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
| - | + | </ul> | |
</p> | </p> | ||
Revision as of 05:40, 16 October 2014
So You Think You Can Synthesize
Project Overview
The 'So You Think You Can Synthesize' project has been the flagship of the Macquarie University iGEM efforts, and intends to to bring synthetic biology to the general public. It provides a forum by which any person with a computer and a question can bring them before a scientist and receive an answer. By sparking conversations on terms with the public, Team Macquarie has reached out in simple language to explain scientific concepts, explain the future of synthetic biology and talk about ethical issues. This pilot project has been highly successful; exploding across the internet, reaching across the world to talk to people across a range of ages and demographics, igniting conversations about synthetic biology and its role in the 21st century.
Project Introduction
Mass media in the 21st century encompasses television to social media, and is largely responsible for the opinions and knowledge of the public in regards to important community issues. Despite the extensive debate and discourse in journals regarding synthetic biology, these papers are not written at a level accessible to all audiences, leading to an ever-widening rift between academic thought on the ethics and potential of biotechnology and the public. Additionally, sensationalist media is responsible for misinformation and inaccuracies in representing the potential and consequences of the field. We believe that social media and popular formats of communication provide the potential to close this knowledge gap between academic audiences and the general public. By addressing this issue with an online Question and Answer contest, the Macquarie University team believes that:
-
The public can be equipped with up-to-date and accurate information regarding synthetic biology, addressing the failures of the media & scientists. It avoids the complex language of academic and philosophical journals, communicating the technical and ethical issues simply and effectively.
- A conversation started on the public's terms is more comprehensible to ordinary people, and speaks directly to them and their concerns. By allowing the public to express and drive the conversation, the issues of primary interest to the public can be identified or allayed.
-
Direct and open communication with academics servers a watchdog function, ensuring proper public oversight of areas of ethical concern, and encouraging scientific personnel also to consider the ethical and social consequences of synthetic biology.
-
Our vision for regional forums prompts discussion of a broad range of cultural perspectives on issues of synthetic biology, and allows for those culturally versed in social and ethical issues of their region to address those concerns, in a manner not engaged in by Western, often secular, literature.
