"
Team:Michigan Software
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:Michigan_Software/NavBar}} | {{Template:Michigan_Software/NavBar}} | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
| - | |||
<div class="sciencephoto"> | <div class="sciencephoto"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b1/ScientistImage.jpg"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b1/ScientistImage.jpg"> | ||
| + | <p class="sciencedescription">Experimental reproducibility is hindered by current protocols.</p> | ||
| + | <a href="http://https://2014.igem.org/Team:Michigan_Software/Aims">Learn more</a> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
<p> Choosing reliable protocols for experiments is a problem that wet labs routinely face. Experimental practices may differ immensely across laboratories, including the amount of time spent on each step, the use of specific brands of reagent, or conditions under which an experiment was performed. </p> | <p> Choosing reliable protocols for experiments is a problem that wet labs routinely face. Experimental practices may differ immensely across laboratories, including the amount of time spent on each step, the use of specific brands of reagent, or conditions under which an experiment was performed. </p> | ||
| - | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 00:09, 16 October 2014
Choosing reliable protocols for experiments is a problem that wet labs routinely face. Experimental practices may differ immensely across laboratories, including the amount of time spent on each step, the use of specific brands of reagent, or conditions under which an experiment was performed.
To improve protocol efficiency and reproducibility, we developed a free online catalog of laboratory protocols: Protocat. With a built-in rating, favoriting, and commenting system, Protocat condenses the vast array of laboratory protocols into one easy-to-browse location, increasing protocol reproducibility for labs across the globe.
Learn more about our software
