Team:XMU-China/Project Application RBSpromoter

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 469: Line 469:
<br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: center; line-height: 150%; font-size: 24px;">
<p style="text-align: center; line-height: 150%; font-size: 24px;">
-
     <span style="font-size: 24px; font-weight: 700;">Characterization the </span><span style="font-size: 24px; font-weight: 700;">activity</span><span style="font-size: 24px; font-weight: 700;"> of</span><span style="font-size: 24px; font-weight: 700;"> promoter </span><span style="font-size: 24px; font-weight: 700;">and efficiency of RBS </span><span style="font-size: 24px; font-weight: 700;">by chemotaxis</span>
+
     <span style="font-size: 24px; font-weight: 700;">Characterization the activity of promoter and efficiency of RBS by chemotaxis</span>
</p>
</p>
 +
<hr width="100%" size="2">
 +
<br/>
<p style="line-height: 150%; text-indent: -0.07em; font-size: 16px; margin-left: -0.09em;">
<p style="line-height: 150%; text-indent: -0.07em; font-size: 16px; margin-left: -0.09em;">
     <span style=" font-size: 16px; font-weight: 700;">The limitation of fluorescence measurement</span>
     <span style=" font-size: 16px; font-weight: 700;">The limitation of fluorescence measurement</span>
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px; styleName: Normal;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; styleName: Normal;">
-
     <span style="">Traditionally, </span><span style="">the activity of promoters </span><span style="">and</span><span style=""> efficiency of RBS</span><span style=""> are characterized with fluores</span><span style="">cence intensity, of which the measurement quite rel</span><span style="">y on apparatus. Without </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">r</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">elative</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> equipment</span><span style="">, some iGEM teams can’t </span><span style=";">do</span><span style=""> </span><span style=" ">researches such</span><span style=" "> </span><span style=" ">as</span><span style=" "> interlab</span><span style=" "> study</span><span style=" ">. And </span><span style=" ">the precision and accuracy are determined by apparatus too</span><span style=" ">. What’s </span><span style=" ">more</span><span style=" ">, if we need to measure fluorescence intensity in continuous time, it</span><span style=" "> calls </span><span style=" ">for continuous sampling resulting in accumulated error.</span>
+
     Traditionally, the activity of promoters and efficiency of RBS are characterized with fluorescence intensity, of which the measurement quite rely on apparatus. Without relative equipment, some iGEM teams can’t do researches such as interlab study. And the precision and accuracy are determined by apparatus too. What’s more, if we need to measure fluorescence intensity in continuous time, it calls for continuous sampling resulting in accumulated error.</span>
</p>
</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">
<p style="font-size: 16px;">
Line 483: Line 485:
     <span style="  font-size: 16px; font-weight: 700;">Chemotaxis can do more</span>
     <span style="  font-size: 16px; font-weight: 700;">Chemotaxis can do more</span>
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
-
     <span style=" ">As we have already proved</span><span style=" "> that </span><span style=" ">the expression strength of </span><span style="  font-style: italic;">CheZ</span><span style=" "> </span><span style=" ">is positive</span><span style=" ">ly</span><span style=" "> r</span><span style=" ">elated with motile ability,</span><span style=" "> we </span><span style=" ">develop</span><span style=" "> </span><span style=" ">a new system</span><span style=" "> </span><span style=" ">to characterize</span><span style=" "> the activity</span><span style=" "> </span><span style=" ">of different </span><span style=" ">promoter</span><span style=" ">s</span><span style=" "> </span><span style=" ">and</span><span style=" "> </span><span style=" ">efficiency of </span><span style=" ">RBS </span><span style=" ">by chemotaxis. </span><span style=" ">We adopt variable-controlling approach </span><span style=" ">to</span><span style=" "> </span><span style=" ">compare </span><span style=" ">c</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">hemotactic</span><span style=" "> </span><span style=" ">diameter shown as the size of the colony</span><span style=" "> </span><span style=" ">between</span><span style=" "> </span><span style=" ">standard</span><span style=" "> parts and unknown parts</span><span style=" "> by measuring the diameter of colony</span><span style=" ">.</span><span style=" "> The only apparatus we need is</span><span style=" "> a</span><span style=" "> </span><span style=" ">ruler.</span>
+
     As we have already proved that the expression strength of <i>CheZ</i> is positively related with motile ability, we develop a new system to characterize the activity of different promoters and efficiency of RBS by chemotaxis. We adopt variable-controlling approach to compare chemotactic diameter shown as the size of the colony between standard parts and unknown parts by measuring the diameter of colony. The only apparatus we need is a ruler.
</p>
</p>
<p style="text-align: left; line-height: 150%; font-size: 16px;">
<p style="text-align: left; line-height: 150%; font-size: 16px;">
Line 490: Line 492:
</p>
</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;">
-
     <span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">In order to verify the reliability of the new system. </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">We </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">construct</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> the three </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">devices with different</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">promoters</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> which have been characterized by published papers </span><span style="valign: sup;">[1]</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">(</span><span style="font-weight: 700;">Figure 1</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">)</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">.</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">Three variable </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">promoters are pLac</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">(BBa_R0010)</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">, pBAD</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">(BBa_K206000)</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">,</span><span style="font-size: 16px;"> </span><span style="font-size: 16px;">pTet</span><span style="font-size: 16px;"> </span><span style="font-size: 16px;">(BBa_R0040)</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">.</span>
+
     In order to verify the reliability of the new system. We construct the three devices with different promoters which have been characterized by published papers<sup>[1]</sup> (<strong>Figure 1</strong>). Three variable promoters are pLac (BBa_R0010), pBAD (BBa_K206000), pTet (BBa_R0040).
 +
</p>
</p>
</p>
<p style="text-align: left; line-height: 150%; font-size: 16px;">
<p style="text-align: left; line-height: 150%; font-size: 16px;">
     &nbsp;
     &nbsp;
</p>
</p>
-
<table style="border: currentColor; border-image: none; font-size: 14px; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; border-collapse: collapse; styleName: Normal Table; border-insideH: 1px none #000000; border-insideV: 1px none #000000; cellpadding: 0px 7px 0px 7px;">
+
<table style="border: currentColor; border-image: none; font-size: 16px; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; border-collapse: collapse; styleName: Normal Table; border-insideH: 1px none #000000; border-insideV: 1px none #000000; cellpadding: 0px 7px 0px 7px;">
     <tbody>
     <tbody>
         <tr class="firstRow">
         <tr class="firstRow">
Line 523: Line 526:
</p>
</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;">
-
     <span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">We stab </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">all </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">three</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">colonies</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">with different promoters </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">on the same semi-solid culture medium</span><span style="font-weight: 400; styleName: Default Paragraph Font;"> with </span><span style="font-weight: 400; styleName: Default Paragraph Font;">0.02</span><span style="font-weight: 400; styleName: Default Paragraph Font;">%</span><span style="font-weight: 400; styleName: Default Paragraph Font;"> L-arabione</span><span style="font-weight: 400; styleName: Default Paragraph Font;"> and 50</span><span style="font-weight: 400; styleName: Default Paragraph Font;">μg</span><span style="font-weight: 400; styleName: Default Paragraph Font;">/ml </span><span style="font-weight: 400; styleName: Default Paragraph Font;">chloramphenicol </span><span style="font-weight: 400; styleName: Default Paragraph Font;">added</span><span style="font-weight: 400; styleName: Default Paragraph Font;"> in </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">(</span><span style="font-weight: 700;">Figure 2A</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">)</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">. After 36 hours culturing, </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">difference of chemotactic</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> diameters between each colonies </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">could be </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">distinguish</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">ed</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">as </span><span style="font-weight: 700;">Figure 2B</span><span style="font-weight: 400; styleName: Default Paragraph Font;">.</span>
+
     We stab all three colonies with different promoters on the same semi-solid culture medium with 0.02% L-arabione and 50μg/ml chloramphenicol added in (<strong>Figure 2A</strong>). After 36 hours culturing, difference of chemotactic diameters between each colonies could be distinguished as <strong>Figure 2B</strong>.
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
     &nbsp;
     &nbsp;
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
     &nbsp;
     &nbsp;
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
     &nbsp;
     &nbsp;
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
     &nbsp;
     &nbsp;
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
     &nbsp;
     &nbsp;
</p>
</p>
-
<table style="border: currentColor; border-image: none; font-size: 14px; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; border-collapse: collapse; styleName: Normal Table; border-insideH: 1px none #000000; border-insideV: 1px none #000000; cellpadding: 0px 7px 0px 7px;">
+
<table style="border: currentColor; border-image: none; font-size: 16px; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; border-collapse: collapse; styleName: Normal Table; border-insideH: 1px none #000000; border-insideV: 1px none #000000; cellpadding: 0px 7px 0px 7px;">
     <tbody>
     <tbody>
         <tr class="firstRow" style="height: 264px;">
         <tr class="firstRow" style="height: 264px;">
Line 576: Line 579:
     &nbsp;
     &nbsp;
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
-
     <span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">Actually,</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">we k</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">eep</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> measuring </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">c</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">hemotactic</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">diameters</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> of three colon</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">ies </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">at different time and set the diameter of the colony with promoter Lac as 1.0. We got the following table (</span><span style="font-weight: 700;">Table 1</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">). The ratio</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> between each colony diameters</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">is fixed after 36 hours</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">. </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">If we set the </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">fixed</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> ratio</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> as relative promoter </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">ac</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">tivities</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">, from our characterization, promoter </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">TetR</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">(</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">BBa_R0040</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">)</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">activity</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> is 1.86</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> relative to </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">p</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">romoter </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">Lac</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">(</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">BBa_R0010</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">)</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">. Refer</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">to published papers</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="valign: sup;">[1]</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">, promoter activity between pTetR and pLac has already been measured, and the</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">ir ratio</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> (pTetR/pLac)</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> is 1.58. So</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> our </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">system is reliable as it could tell the difference between different promoter activities. However, no published data tell us about the rela</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">tive promoter activity of pBAD</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">(BBa_K206000)</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">, </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">while</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> L-arabinose can induce pBAD</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">(BBa_K206000)</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">. </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">W</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">e</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> make the </span>
+
     Actually, we keep measuring chemotactic diameters of three colonies at different time and set the diameter of the colony with promoter Lac as 1.0. We got the following table (<b>Table 1</b>). The ratio between each colony diameters is fixed after 36 hours. If we set the fixed ratio as relative promoter activities, from our characterization, promoter TetR (BBa_R0040) activity is 1.86 relative to promoter Lac (BBa_R0010). Refer to published papers<sub>[1]</sub>, promoter activity between pTetR and pLac has already been measured, and their ratio (pTetR/pLac) is 1.58. So our system is reliable as it could tell the difference between different promoter activities. However, no published data tell us about the relative promoter activity of pBAD (BBa_K206000), while L-arabinose can induce pBAD (BBa_K206000). We make the first characterization data of pBAD activity relative to pLac with 0.02% L-arabinose added in. And the ratio (pBAD/pLac) is 0.37.
-
</p>
+
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
-
    <span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">first </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">characterization data of </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">pBAD</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">activity </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">relative</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">to </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">pLac</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> with 0.02% L-arabinose</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> added in</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">. And the ratio (pBAD/pLac) is 0.37.</span>
+
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
 
 +
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
     &nbsp;
     &nbsp;
</p>
</p>
-
<table style="border: currentColor; border-image: none; font-size: 14px; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; border-collapse: collapse; styleName: Normal Table; border-insideH: 1px none #000000; border-insideV: 1px none #000000; cellpadding: 0px 7px 0px 7px;">
+
<table style="border: currentColor; border-image: none; font-size: 16px; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; border-collapse: collapse; styleName: Normal Table; border-insideH: 1px none #000000; border-insideV: 1px none #000000; cellpadding: 0px 7px 0px 7px;">
     <tbody>
     <tbody>
         <tr class="firstRow">
         <tr class="firstRow">
Line 606: Line 607:
     </tbody>
     </tbody>
</table>
</table>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
     &nbsp;
     &nbsp;
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
     <span style="font-weight: 700;">Extensive application</span>
     <span style="font-weight: 700;">Extensive application</span>
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
-
     <span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">As the results </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">shown above, we draw a conclusion that this new s</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">ystem works well with little errors.</span><span style="color: rgb(112, 48, 160);"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">We can also</span><span style="color: rgb(112, 48, 160);"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">standardize </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">this method to characterize most of the promoters</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">. What’s more, it can be used to characterize the</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">RBS</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> efficiency</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> (</span><span style="font-weight: 700;">Figure 3A</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">)</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">, </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">terminator</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">efficiency</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> (</span><span style="font-weight: 700;">Figure 3</span><span style="font-weight: 700;">B</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">)</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">and expression strength</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> of </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">target gene </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">e</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">t</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">c</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">(</span><span style="font-weight: 700;">Figure 3C</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">)</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">.</span>
+
     As the results shown above, we draw a conclusion that this new system works well with little errors. We can also standardize this method to characterize most of the promoters. What’s more, it can be used to characterize the RBS efficiency (<strong>Figure 3A</strong>), terminator efficiency (<strong>Figure 3B</strong>) and expression strength of target gene etc (<strong>Figure 3C</strong>).
</p>
</p>
<p style="text-align: left; font-family: 宋体; font-size: 16px;">
<p style="text-align: left; font-family: 宋体; font-size: 16px;">
     &nbsp;
     &nbsp;
</p>
</p>
-
<table style="border: currentColor; border-image: none; font-size: 14px; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; border-collapse: collapse; styleName: Normal Table; border-insideH: 1px none #000000; border-insideV: 1px none #000000; cellpadding: 0px 7px 0px 7px;">
+
<table style="border: currentColor; border-image: none; font-size: 16px; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; border-collapse: collapse; styleName: Normal Table; border-insideH: 1px none #000000; border-insideV: 1px none #000000; cellpadding: 0px 7px 0px 7px;">
     <tbody>
     <tbody>
         <tr class="firstRow">
         <tr class="firstRow">
Line 667: Line 668:
     </tbody>
     </tbody>
</table>
</table>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
     &nbsp;
     &nbsp;
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
-
     <span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">Click the following biobricks to read more about our results: </span>
+
     Click the following biobricks to read more about our results:  
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
-
    <span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">BBa_K1412614</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span>
+
  BBa_K1412614
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
-
     <span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">BBa_K1412014</span>
+
     BBa_K1412014
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
-
     <span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">BBa_K1412000</span>
+
     BBa_K1412000
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
     &nbsp;
     &nbsp;
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 14px;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;">
     <span style="font-weight: 700;">Reference</span>
     <span style="font-weight: 700;">Reference</span>
</p>
</p>
-
<p style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -24px; font-size: 14px; margin-left: 24px; styleName: Normal;">
+
<p style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -24px; font-size: 16px; margin-left: 24px; styleName: Normal;">
     <span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">1.</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">Kelly J R, Rubin A J, Davis J H, et al. Measuring the activity of BioBrick promoters using an in vivo reference standard[J]. Journal of biological engineering, 2009, 3(1): 4.</span>
     <span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">1.</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;"> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,宋体;">Kelly J R, Rubin A J, Davis J H, et al. Measuring the activity of BioBrick promoters using an in vivo reference standard[J]. Journal of biological engineering, 2009, 3(1): 4.</span>
</p>
</p>

Revision as of 21:10, 15 October 2014

side_bar


Characterization the activity of promoter and efficiency of RBS by chemotaxis



The limitation of fluorescence measurement

Traditionally, the activity of promoters and efficiency of RBS are characterized with fluorescence intensity, of which the measurement quite rely on apparatus. Without relative equipment, some iGEM teams can’t do researches such as interlab study. And the precision and accuracy are determined by apparatus too. What’s more, if we need to measure fluorescence intensity in continuous time, it calls for continuous sampling resulting in accumulated error.

 

Chemotaxis can do more

As we have already proved that the expression strength of CheZ is positively related with motile ability, we develop a new system to characterize the activity of different promoters and efficiency of RBS by chemotaxis. We adopt variable-controlling approach to compare chemotactic diameter shown as the size of the colony between standard parts and unknown parts by measuring the diameter of colony. The only apparatus we need is a ruler.

 

In order to verify the reliability of the new system. We construct the three devices with different promoters which have been characterized by published papers[1] (Figure 1). Three variable promoters are pLac (BBa_R0010), pBAD (BBa_K206000), pTet (BBa_R0040).

 

Figure 1 Devices with different promoters.

 

Promoter activity characterization

We stab all three colonies with different promoters on the same semi-solid culture medium with 0.02% L-arabione and 50μg/ml chloramphenicol added in (Figure 2A). After 36 hours culturing, difference of chemotactic diameters between each colonies could be distinguished as Figure 2B.

 

 

 

 

 

A

B

Figure 2A Schematic of spotting bacteria. Figure 2B Culturing with 0.02 L-arabione for 48 hours, distinguish difference of chemotaxis diameters between each colonies is shown.

 

Actually, we keep measuring chemotactic diameters of three colonies at different time and set the diameter of the colony with promoter Lac as 1.0. We got the following table (Table 1). The ratio between each colony diameters is fixed after 36 hours. If we set the fixed ratio as relative promoter activities, from our characterization, promoter TetR (BBa_R0040) activity is 1.86 relative to promoter Lac (BBa_R0010). Refer to published papers[1], promoter activity between pTetR and pLac has already been measured, and their ratio (pTetR/pLac) is 1.58. So our system is reliable as it could tell the difference between different promoter activities. However, no published data tell us about the relative promoter activity of pBAD (BBa_K206000), while L-arabinose can induce pBAD (BBa_K206000). We make the first characterization data of pBAD activity relative to pLac with 0.02% L-arabinose added in. And the ratio (pBAD/pLac) is 0.37.

 

Table 1 The relative activity of different promoters.

 

Extensive application

As the results shown above, we draw a conclusion that this new system works well with little errors. We can also standardize this method to characterize most of the promoters. What’s more, it can be used to characterize the RBS efficiency (Figure 3A), terminator efficiency (Figure 3B) and expression strength of target gene etc (Figure 3C).

 

Figure 3A Device to characterize the efficiency different RBS.

Figure 3B Device to characterize the efficiency different terminator.

Figure 3C Device to characterize the expression of target gene.

 

Click the following biobricks to read more about our results:

BBa_K1412614

BBa_K1412014

BBa_K1412000

 

Reference

1. Kelly J R, Rubin A J, Davis J H, et al. Measuring the activity of BioBrick promoters using an in vivo reference standard[J]. Journal of biological engineering, 2009, 3(1): 4.