Team:Yale/Project
From 2014.igem.org
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
} | } | ||
- | . | + | .callout{ |
- | + | font-family:'Open Sans'; | |
- | + | font-weight:700; | |
+ | color:#FFF; | ||
+ | background-color:#213463; | ||
+ | text-align:center; | ||
+ | border-radius:4px; | ||
+ | padding-top: 5px; | ||
+ | padding-bottom: 5px; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | .callout h1{ | ||
+ | color:#EEE; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | .tinycall{ | ||
+ | font-family:'Open Sans'; | ||
+ | font-weight:700; | ||
+ | color:#213463; | ||
+ | |||
+ | text-align:center; | ||
+ | border-radius:4px; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | .tinycall h1{ | ||
+ | color:#213463; | ||
+ | } | ||
} | } | ||
Line 99: | Line 121: | ||
<td style="border:none; width:1100px" colspan="12" align="center"> | <td style="border:none; width:1100px" colspan="12" align="center"> | ||
- | + | ||
+ | <div class = "callout"> | ||
<h1 style="margin-top:70px; font-size:50px;">Ampersand: an Anti-Microbial Peptide Coating</h1> | <h1 style="margin-top:70px; font-size:50px;">Ampersand: an Anti-Microbial Peptide Coating</h1> | ||
- | + | </div> | |
+ | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 108: | Line 132: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td colspan="12"> | <td colspan="12"> | ||
+ | <div class = "tinycall"> | ||
<h1 style="margin-top:25px; margin-bottom:45px; font-size:35px">Project Overview</h1> | <h1 style="margin-top:25px; margin-bottom:45px; font-size:35px">Project Overview</h1> | ||
- | + | </div> | |
<p> | <p> | ||
<strong>Biofilm formation on surfaces is an issue in the medical field, naval industry, and other areas. </strong><br /> | <strong>Biofilm formation on surfaces is an issue in the medical field, naval industry, and other areas. </strong><br /> | ||
Line 163: | Line 188: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
<strong>Anti-biofouling Peptide: LL-37</strong> <br /> | <strong>Anti-biofouling Peptide: LL-37</strong> <br /> | ||
- | Our candidate anti-microbial peptide is LL-37 (Figure 4). This peptide prevents uncontrolled growth of microbes. It is amphipathic, contains an alpha helix, and is 37 residues long starting with two leucines. We improved on this Biobrick from <strong> | + | Our candidate anti-microbial peptide is LL-37 (Figure 4). This peptide prevents uncontrolled growth of microbes. It is amphipathic, contains an alpha helix, and is 37 residues long starting with two leucines. We improved on this Biobrick from <strong>BBa_K1162006</strong>, Utah State 2013. |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Conventional cationic antimicrobials target bacteria. However, there are an increasing number of bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics. Thus, we instead want to focus on targeting the biofilm formation. Anti-biofilm peptides are very similar to the cationic antimicrobial peptides, containing both cationic and hydrophobic amino acids, but they differ in their structure-activity relationship and have less specificity than antibiotics. Of the antimicrobial peptides, LL-37 seems to the most promising. | Conventional cationic antimicrobials target bacteria. However, there are an increasing number of bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics. Thus, we instead want to focus on targeting the biofilm formation. Anti-biofilm peptides are very similar to the cationic antimicrobial peptides, containing both cationic and hydrophobic amino acids, but they differ in their structure-activity relationship and have less specificity than antibiotics. Of the antimicrobial peptides, LL-37 seems to the most promising. | ||
Line 182: | Line 207: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | <strong>Two Levels of Regulation for T7 Polymerase Expression</strong> | + | <strong>Two Levels of Regulation for T7 Polymerase Expression</strong><br /> |
Our goal is to reduce the expression of T7 RNA polymerase and create an efficient system for the expression of heterologous proteins in E. coli. In order to carry this out, we chose to introduce two levels of regulation. The first level of regulation will be at the transcriptional level. We will use pZE21 of the pZ system of vectors developed by Lutz and Buschard with the PLlacO promoter to inhibit the expression of T7 RNA polymerase. The PLlacO promoter controls the expression of the crRNA (cis repressing RNA) and is induced by IPTG (isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside). The second level of regulation will occur at the translational level. We will use the artificial riboregulatory elements (Figure 2) devised by Isaacs et al. to restrict translation of the mRNA sequence encoding the T7 RNA Polymerase (Isaacs et al., 2004). The cis-repressing RNA (crRNA) sequence will be inserted downstream of the promoter driving T7 RNA Polymerase and upstream of the ribosomal binding site (RBS). The crRNA is complimentary to the RBS and forms a stem loop at the 5’ end of the mRNA segment, blocking ribosomal docking and translation. A second promoter, PLtetO, which is induced by ATC, will express the trans-activating RNA (taRNA) capable of undergoing a linear-loop interaction that will expose the RBS and allow for translation of T7 RNA Polymerase. Once the T7 RNA Polymerase is expressed, it can then bind to the T7 Promoter and lead to the expression of the gene of interest, such as the antimicrobial peptide (Figure 3). | Our goal is to reduce the expression of T7 RNA polymerase and create an efficient system for the expression of heterologous proteins in E. coli. In order to carry this out, we chose to introduce two levels of regulation. The first level of regulation will be at the transcriptional level. We will use pZE21 of the pZ system of vectors developed by Lutz and Buschard with the PLlacO promoter to inhibit the expression of T7 RNA polymerase. The PLlacO promoter controls the expression of the crRNA (cis repressing RNA) and is induced by IPTG (isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside). The second level of regulation will occur at the translational level. We will use the artificial riboregulatory elements (Figure 2) devised by Isaacs et al. to restrict translation of the mRNA sequence encoding the T7 RNA Polymerase (Isaacs et al., 2004). The cis-repressing RNA (crRNA) sequence will be inserted downstream of the promoter driving T7 RNA Polymerase and upstream of the ribosomal binding site (RBS). The crRNA is complimentary to the RBS and forms a stem loop at the 5’ end of the mRNA segment, blocking ribosomal docking and translation. A second promoter, PLtetO, which is induced by ATC, will express the trans-activating RNA (taRNA) capable of undergoing a linear-loop interaction that will expose the RBS and allow for translation of T7 RNA Polymerase. Once the T7 RNA Polymerase is expressed, it can then bind to the T7 Promoter and lead to the expression of the gene of interest, such as the antimicrobial peptide (Figure 3). | ||
<br /> | <br /> |
Revision as of 19:38, 12 October 2014
Ampersand: an Anti-Microbial Peptide Coating |
|||||||||||
Project Overview
Biofilm formation on surfaces is an issue in the medical field, naval industry, and other areas. |
|||||||||||
Project Goals
1. Create a T7 Riboregulation System to control the expression of our proteins:
2. Design the anti-biofouling peptide using both a modular approach.
(Show figure 8) First, we will need to determine if we have adhered material present in various solutions and surfaces. In order to these this out, we will look at the contact angle measurement. Surfaces that are wet will have a very shallow contact angle because the surface absorbs the test liquid. Non-wetting surfaces will usually exhibit an obtuse contact angle because there is no absorption. This test will determine if our coating is present and does not dissolve when wet. As a further test to determine if the material is able to adhere to surfaces, we will use Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). The adhesive should exhibit a different spectrum than uncured adhesive. This difference probably lies in the different vibrational bond energies caused by coordination or bonding to our surface. The next assessment will be to determine how much coating is retained under stress with atomic force microscopy (AFM). A probe will be applied to the sample to determine the force between the atoms of the sample and the atoms of the tip. Image contrast can then be generated by monitoring the forces of the interactions between the tip and the peptide’s surface. |
|||||||||||
Introduction
Biofilm formation: A problem in clinics and cargo ships
An improved T7 Riboregulation System
A DOPA-containing peptide derived from mussel foot protein
Anti-biofouling Peptide: LL-37 |
|||||||||||
T7 Riboregulation System: Experimental Design
Strains, Plasmids, and Reagents
Two Levels of Regulation for T7 Polymerase Expression |
|||||||||||
Anti-Fouling Peptide Construct: Experimental DesignWe hypothesize that we can develop an improved version of the current adhesives by developing a fusion protein of Mgfp-5 with Mefp-1 as the anchoring region for the anti-biofouling peptide. An integral part of developing this peptide is to co-translationally insert L-DOPA into our peptide, which has never been done before with mussel foot proteins (Figure 5). In this process of orthogonal translation, we first will get rid of the UAG stop codon and then transform the strain to synthesize tRNA and tRNA transferase that corresponds to the UAG codon and the L-DOPA non-standard amino acid to develop the GRO. The advantage of this procedure is that we have the ability to skip the time-consuming and inefficient tyrosinase enzyme treatment step.
Protein Purification
We plan to purify the protein by using the Twin Strep Tag in tandem with the Flag tag, which was included in out master construct of the anti-biofouling peptide (Figure 6). The Flag tag is perfectly cleavable by the enzyme enterokinase. The FLAG tag is made up of 8 amino acids and works well for low-abundance proteins. It is hydrophilic, so it will most likely not interfere with protein folding and function of the target protein. The Strep tag is also made up of 8 amino acids that will not disturb the protein’s functions. We chose the FLAG tag because it is perfectly cleavable. Info on LL-37 and N-terminus? The protein will be purified in a Strep-Tactin® Sepharose® column. In order to address the L-DOPA adhesive L-DOPA component, our final step is to elute with a base to reduce the amount of the anti-biofouling peptide that sticks to the column due to L-DOPA adhesion (Figure 7).
|
|||||||||||
Characterization of Coating Adhesion PropertiesWe hypothesize that we can develop an improved version of the current adhesives by developing a fusion protein of Mgfp-5 with Mefp-1 as the anchoring region for the anti-biofouling peptide. An integral part of developing this peptide is to co-translationally insert L-DOPA into our peptide, which has never been done before with mussel foot proteins (Figure 5). In this process of orthogonal translation, we first will get rid of the UAG stop codon and then transform the strain to synthesize tRNA and tRNA transferase that corresponds to the UAG codon and the L-DOPA non-standard amino acid to develop the GRO. The advantage of this procedure is that we have the ability to skip the time-consuming and inefficient tyrosinase enzyme treatment step.
Protein Purification
We plan to purify the protein by using the Twin Strep Tag in tandem with the Flag tag, which was included in out master construct of the anti-biofouling peptide (Figure 6). The Flag tag is perfectly cleavable by the enzyme enterokinase. The FLAG tag is made up of 8 amino acids and works well for low-abundance proteins. It is hydrophilic, so it will most likely not interfere with protein folding and function of the target protein. The Strep tag is also made up of 8 amino acids that will not disturb the protein’s functions. We chose the FLAG tag because it is perfectly cleavable. Info on LL-37 and N-terminus? The protein will be purified in a Strep-Tactin® Sepharose® column. In order to address the L-DOPA adhesive L-DOPA component, our final step is to elute with a base to reduce the amount of the anti-biofouling peptide that sticks to the column due to L-DOPA adhesion (Figure 7).
|