Team:ULB-Brussels/Human
From 2014.igem.org
m |
m |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
<!-- (1, 2) --> | <!-- (1, 2) --> | ||
- | <p>However | + | <p>However we realized that few people were aware of it, and still mingled GMM with genetically modified crops, which have a terrible reputation in western Europe. Although, Mighty Coli would be welcomed in the industry, we feared that if for some reason we had to ask the authorization of the public to use it, we would only face fear, incomprehension, and eventually refusal. Since the use of synthetic organisms is an important ethical and societal issue, we think that the general public should be included in the debate. But we also think that it should be properly informed about the nature of synthetic organisms and the way they are used. Hence, we decided to organize popularization events on the subject. |
<!-- <p>On the other hand, if we consider the biosecurity issues raised by our project, we can conclude that since Mighty Coli is only able to improve the production yield of a protein, the main issues that could be raised depend on the protein of interest (PI) rather than Mighty Coli in itself. However, one could argue that a bacterium that would somehow escape from a bioreactor would not be able to lose its ability to overproduce the PI, which could lead to various pollution of the environment depending on the PI.</p> | <!-- <p>On the other hand, if we consider the biosecurity issues raised by our project, we can conclude that since Mighty Coli is only able to improve the production yield of a protein, the main issues that could be raised depend on the protein of interest (PI) rather than Mighty Coli in itself. However, one could argue that a bacterium that would somehow escape from a bioreactor would not be able to lose its ability to overproduce the PI, which could lead to various pollution of the environment depending on the PI.</p> | ||
<p>As a conclusion, we choose to address two different issues in our human practice: the first is the popularization and the public awareness of GMM in particular; the second is the biosecurity measures that should be taken in order to use Mighty Coli responsibly. </p> --> | <p>As a conclusion, we choose to address two different issues in our human practice: the first is the popularization and the public awareness of GMM in particular; the second is the biosecurity measures that should be taken in order to use Mighty Coli responsibly. </p> --> |
Revision as of 07:44, 12 October 2014
$~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \newcommand{\MyColi}{{\small Mighty\hspace{0.12cm}Coli}} \newcommand{\Stabi}{\small Stabi}$ $\newcommand{\EColi}{\small E.coli} \newcommand{\SCere}{\small S.cerevisae}\\[0cm] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \newcommand{\PI}{\small PI}$ $\newcommand{\Igo}{\Large\mathcal{I}} \newcommand{\Tgo}{\Large\mathcal{T}} \newcommand{\Ogo}{\Large\mathcal{O}} ~$
|
---|