Team:StanfordBrownSpelman/Human Practices

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 63: Line 63:
   <h6><center><a href="#images" id="pics">Images</a> ● <a href="#results" id="data">EPA Partnership</a>  ● <a href="#interviews">Scientific Expert Interviews (rename?)</a> ● <a href="#references" id="contact">Publications</a> ● <a href="#references" id="links">References</a></h6>
   <h6><center><a href="#images" id="pics">Images</a> ● <a href="#results" id="data">EPA Partnership</a>  ● <a href="#interviews">Scientific Expert Interviews (rename?)</a> ● <a href="#references" id="contact">Publications</a> ● <a href="#references" id="links">References</a></h6>
   <h6>
   <h6>
-
   Many of us are aware of the immense potential of synthetic biology. Yet, like any other tool, it can be used both benevolently and malevolently. This year, our team worked on the creation of a biosynthetic and biodegradable UAV, or Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. In the present day, UAVs are used for a wide range of purposes, but many people are only familiar with their use in the military. The goal of our human practices project this year was to propagate knowledge about the non-military and humanitarian uses of UAVs. In the process, we interviewed a wide variety of people- experts on UAVs, scientists, businesspeople, and civilians at large. The information gleaned from these interviews was integrated in to an article about modern uses of UAVs. This article was published in online and print media. A few videos from the interviews we conducted can be seen below.
+
   Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) (also known as Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in Europe) have a long history of usage. According to DraganFly Innovations Inc., early UAVs took the form of balloons and they were primarily used for military purposes for monitoring and eliminating enemies in the battlefield. However, in the recent years, UAVs have been increasingly used by civilians to accomplish various scientific and humanitarian missions. Due to their promising ability to accomplish tasks that otherwise could have been tedious, unreachable or even dangerous to civilians, our team has considered the idea of improving the current models of UAVs in order to make them more biodegradable, modular and even cheaper and hence increase their accessibility and practicability to the scientific and civilian societies.  
 +
 
 +
        In the midst of our scientific design process and laboratory work that we have done, our team has taken into serious consideration the risks, ethics and stigma of using UAVs for civilian uses.  Our aim in conducting this iGEM human practices project is to dive deep into the social economic impacts of using synthetic biology in general, and in addition to that, to consider how we can work around the stigma present in the society on the uses of UAVs. Part of this project was also to discuss the regulations and policies involved in the flying of civilian UAVs and assess the accessibility and practicability of the current civilian UAVs. In general, the main reason of doing this human practices project was to bring our laboratory work closer to humanity by assessing the impacts of our creation to the general society.
 +
 
   </h6>
   </h6>
   </div>
   </div>

Revision as of 20:36, 6 October 2014

Stanford–Brown–Spelman iGEM 2014 — Human Practices

  • Image description goes here.

  • Image description goes here.

  • Image description goes here.


  • Image description goes here.

  • Image description goes here.

  • Image description goes here.
Our Work with the EPA: Synthetic biology in the air: Biological UAVs and environmental safety concerns

We are currently working on a series of projects towards the construction of a fully biological unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for use in scientific and humanitarian missions. The prospect of a biologically-produced UAV presents numerous advantages over the current manufacturing paradigm. First, a foundational architecture built by cells allows for construction or repair in locations where it would be difficult to bring traditional tools of production. Second, a major limitation of current research with UAVs is the size and high power consumption of analytical instruments, which require bulky electrical components and large fuselages to support their weight. By moving these functions into cells with biosensing capabilities – for example, a series of cells engineered to report GFP, green fluorescent protein, when conditions exceed a certain threshold concentration of a compound of interest, enabling their detection post-flight – these problems of scale can be avoided.

However, housing live cells on an aerial system presents a new set of problems, chief amongst which is the concern of horizontal gene transfer. Bacterial cells can perform conjugation, a process which allows for plasmids (small, circular strands of DNA) to be copied from one organism to another. In our case, we must take steps to protect the environment from our cells and avoid the possibility that our engineered genes proliferate throughout ecosystems. In addition, not dissimilar to the problem of mechanical UAVs getting lost or crashing and leaching toxins into the environment, we must address what might happen if our biological UAV were to crash and allow the cells on its biofilm to act as an invasive species.

We are harnessing the power of genetic engineering to mitigate both of these scenarios. To address horizontal gene transfer, we are recoding the cells on our UAV to use the UAG stop codon, which usually signals the truncation of a protein during translation, as leucine, an amino acid, instead. When we engineer the genes we wish to transform into our cells (an “amberless” strain, as UAG stop is called “amber”), all instances of UAG will be replaced with different stop codons, and all leucine residues will be coded for by UAG. Thus, any engineered genes which are passed from an amberless cell to a normal cell in the environment will not be read correctly, as each leucine residue will be instead be interpreted as “stop” and will result in the production of a non-functional protein fragment. We hope that our amberless strain can be adopted as a model for any engineered organisms one might wish to send into the environment. Finally, to address the invasion of our cells into the environment, we are engineering a pressure-sensitive “kill switch.” Upon crash, the cells will activate quorum sensing (a method of intercellular communication), which will act as a signal to begin producing a set of proteins which can degrade the cellulose acetate base material. The UAV itself will degrade into glucose, which can be taken up by organisms in the crash environment, while the engineered cells will be killed by the free acetate, which, hopefully, will be in high enough concentration to harm the biofilm but not the crash environment.

Interviews (rename this)
Put interview content here!
Additional Information
Try to avoid having any additional information here. We're trying to keep our site organized, clean, and compelling!
Built atop Foundation. Content &amp Development © Stanford–Brown–Spelman iGEM 2014.