Poster Guidelines

Poster Guidelines and Judging Criteria

To guide teams as they create their team poster, the Judging Committee would like to outline the poster judging guidelines used to analyze team posters. Questions can be directed to Head Poster Judge, Martha Eborall, at 2014_Poster_Judges [AT] igem.org.

In iGEM, the purpose of the poster is to communicate the project to others in a very concise, yet engaging manner. Many posters in the past have been quite “busy” and “unbalanced” with regards to text, figures, and space. Although past winning posters may not have had this balance, it will be an important criterion in judging this year and in future iGEM jamborees.

Posters must conform to the following requirements (posters not conforming to these requirements will not be eligible for any special prizes):

• Dimensions = 4 ft. X 4 ft. (1.219 m X 1.219 m)
• Font size must be readable from a distance. Recommended minimum font sizes are
  • 44 pt for headers
  • 38-40 pt for body text
  • 18-24 pt for captions beneath figures
    NOTE: font size for references may be 16-18 pt

Expected iGEM Poster Components

• Title
• Authors and their Affiliated Institution(s)
• Introduction
• Methodology
• Results/Conclusions
• Acknowledgments
• Funding Attributions (If applicable)

• Abstract
• Objectives
• Motivation
• Team Achievements
• Future Directions
• Human Practices
• Parts Submitted

Poster Evaluation Criteria

• Ability to Stand Alone: The poster should be able to stand alone as a clear communication of the project without the team present.
• Balance: The poster should be a balance of text, figures, and space. Excess text should be avoided - figures should play a dominant role in communicating the project on the poster. There should be adequate space around text and figures to avoid a crowded appearance. Judges will place heavy emphasis on balance.
• Overall Visual Appeal: Color and font changes should be used appropriately. The use of too many colors creates an unprofessional appearance. Dramatic colors should be used only to illustrate dramatic points – overuse is simply confusing. There should be consistent use of color throughout the poster to represent the same concept - the colors should not be randomly switched. Due to red-green color-blindness, use of these colors to represent contrasting concepts should be avoided. A poster with overall visual appeal stands out among other posters.
• Legibility: The poster should be easy to read. There should be high contrast between the text and background. The background should not be busy and distracting. The resolution of the printed poster should be high enough that the text is clear and there is sharp detail on the figures. Avoid use of poor quality micrographs and other images on the poster. Poster text and figures may appear clearer on screen than on paper; therefore, a printout of the poster should be viewed prior to display.
• Quality of Graphics: The key concepts of the project should be diagrammatically represented. It is ideal if a single figure represents the entire concept. Figures should be well labeled and have clear legends. It should not be necessary for presenters to explain the figures.
• Conciseness: The content of the poster should be technically written. It should take no longer than 10 minutes for someone to read the poster.
• Flow: The poster content should follow a logical sequence. The reader should be able to navigate the poster with ease.
• Appropriate and Relevant Content: Careful thought should be put into selection of poster content. Redundancy in the presentation of information becomes tedious and exists at the expense of other information.
• Accuracy of Information Presented: The scientific content of the poster should be accurate. Models should be free of mathematical error. The poster reveals the STEM literacy of the team.
• Grammar/Spelling: Posters should be critiqued before printing for spelling and grammar errors. Scientific names and mathematical units should be presented correctly.
• Attributions: The poster is an opportunity to give credit to contributors who may not be present, and also to other scientists (e.g. earlier workers or competitors). Attribution should be for key concepts and not details (i.e. ~ 5 references but not 20).
• Oral Presentation of Poster: The poster presentations provide judges the opportunity for detailed probing. The team should be able to answer in-depth questions. This opportunity lets judges find out whether teams really understand the project.

Poster Judging Process