Team:Warwick
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 143: | Line 143: | ||
Our project is to use replicons, self-replicating RNA systems as a novel method of gene silencing, to help treat diseases such as type 2 diabetes, alzheimer's, cancer and many more. In this project we are focusing on treating type 2 diabetes, but in theory our biobrick can be used to help treat a vast number of diseases and can be used for many more purposes than just gene silencing. We are utilizing the well characterized Hepatitis C virus subtype 1b RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), a protein that effectively copies a strand of mRNA, a polymerase for RNA rather than DNA. <p> | Our project is to use replicons, self-replicating RNA systems as a novel method of gene silencing, to help treat diseases such as type 2 diabetes, alzheimer's, cancer and many more. In this project we are focusing on treating type 2 diabetes, but in theory our biobrick can be used to help treat a vast number of diseases and can be used for many more purposes than just gene silencing. We are utilizing the well characterized Hepatitis C virus subtype 1b RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), a protein that effectively copies a strand of mRNA, a polymerase for RNA rather than DNA. <p> | ||
- | The main advantages of our method of gene silencing as opposed to conventional gene silencing are that this method is cheaper, it can be performed in situe, and perhaps most importantly is safer, as there is no incorporation into the genome meaning that genes which are not the target of the therapy are not affected. In addition, the gene silencing machinery existing as RNA as opposed to in DNA makes it much more easily accessable, and the addition of certain extra RNA (or alternatively certain biobricks bolted on to our biobrick) could be used to create a feedback mechanism, where the expression of | + | The main advantages of our method of gene silencing as opposed to conventional gene silencing are that this method is cheaper, it can be performed in situe, and perhaps most importantly is safer, as there is no incorporation into the genome meaning that genes which are not the target of the therapy are not affected. In addition, the gene silencing machinery existing as RNA as opposed to in DNA makes it much more easily accessable, and the addition of certain extra RNA (or alternatively certain biobricks bolted on to our biobrick) could be used to create a feedback mechanism, where the expression of the target genes is regulated, as opposed to just reduced by a constant amount. |
<p> | <p> |
Revision as of 13:54, 4 August 2014