Team:Vanderbilt/Notebook
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
td { | td { | ||
colspan: 2 | colspan: 2 | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | #date { | ||
+ | font-weight: bold; | ||
+ | font-size: 13px; | ||
+ | color: black; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 86: | Line 92: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <td width="45%" valign="top" | + | <td width="45%" valign="top"> |
- | + | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p> | ||
<b><font size="4">Spring 2014</font></b> | <b><font size="4">Spring 2014</font></b> | ||
- | < | + | </p> |
- | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/0/00/VU_Genomic_DNA_bands_check_LNS.JPG" align="right" width="250" alt="An example of a gel showing high molecular weight (>10 kb) bands corresponding to successfully extracted plant Genomic DNA (in this case, samples LNS1 and LNS2 from Arabidopsis DNA)" style="padding-bottom:0.5em;"> | |
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/0/00/VU_Genomic_DNA_bands_check_LNS.JPG" align=right width="250" alt="An example of a gel showing high molecular weight (>10 kb) bands corresponding to successfully extracted plant Genomic DNA (in this case, samples LNS1 and LNS2 from Arabidopsis DNA)" style="padding-bottom:0.5em;">< | + | <p><b>March 27th</b></p> |
- | < | + | <ul> |
- | + | <li> | |
- | + | Extracted genomic DNA from 100 mg of <i>Arabidopsis thaliana </i> leaves using a Viogene DNA extraction kit. Samples were labeled ZIN for zingiberene. | |
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li> | ||
+ | Two samples were prepared and nanodropped. The concentration of the first was 2.6 ng/ul, and the second was 3.5 ng/ul of DNA, indicating a minimal yield of DNA. | ||
+ | </li> | ||
- | <div style="color:black;font-size:13pt"> | + | <div id="date" style="color:black;font-size:13pt">March 30th</div> |
* Extracted genomic DNA from 100 mg of <i> Picea abies </i> needles using the same extraction kit and protocol. Samples were labeled CAR for carene. | * Extracted genomic DNA from 100 mg of <i> Picea abies </i> needles using the same extraction kit and protocol. Samples were labeled CAR for carene. | ||
* Two samples were prepared and nanodropped. The concentration of the first was 0.9 ng/ul, and the second was 3.5 ng/ul of DNA, indicating a minimal yield of DNA. | * Two samples were prepared and nanodropped. The concentration of the first was 0.9 ng/ul, and the second was 3.5 ng/ul of DNA, indicating a minimal yield of DNA. | ||
Line 174: | Line 185: | ||
* The results of the genomic DNA PCR indicated each gene had a large fraction of introns. None of the genes had a distinct band at exactly the right weight corresponding with what the intron-less cDNA size would be. | * The results of the genomic DNA PCR indicated each gene had a large fraction of introns. None of the genes had a distinct band at exactly the right weight corresponding with what the intron-less cDNA size would be. | ||
- | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/2/2f/VU_First_RT_PCR_results_cad_hum_sab_san.JPG" align="right" width="270" > | |
<b><font size="6">Fall 2014</font></b> | <b><font size="6">Fall 2014</font></b> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
Line 250: | Line 261: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </html> |
Revision as of 19:13, 8 February 2015
|
||||||||||
Lab Notebook | ||||||||||
Spring 2014 March 27th
March 30th
* Extracted genomic DNA from 100 mg of Picea abies needles using the same extraction kit and protocol. Samples were labeled CAR for carene.
* Two samples were prepared and nanodropped. The concentration of the first was 0.9 ng/ul, and the second was 3.5 ng/ul of DNA, indicating a minimal yield of DNA.
'''March 31th'''
* Ran a 0.6 % argarose gel on the DNA extracted from ZIN and CAR, as well as the column flow-through from the kit.
* ZIN1, ZIN2, CAR1, and CAR2 all show a faint but distinct DNA band above the highest rung on the DNA ladder (>10kb), showing the presence of DNA. No bands were seen on the kit flow-through. Indicates successful genomic extraction.
*Preformed a second genomic extraction on Picea abies to improve yield. Nanodrop shows CAR3 to be at 6.2 ng/ul and CAR4 to be 11.5 ng/ul.
* Extracted genomic DNA from Gossypium hirsutum . Samples nanodroppped: CAD1 1.8 ng/ul and CAD2 7.8 ng/ul.
'''April 1st'''
* Ran a gel on CAR3, CAR4, CAD1, and CAD2. Brighter genomic DNA bands were seen on the cadinene camples than before, but cadinene samples showed significant smearing near the top of the gel.
'''April 2nd'''
* Extracted genomic DNA from Salvia officinalis . Samples nanodropped: SAB1 7.5 ng/ul, and SAB 11.4 ng/ul.
* Extracted genomic DNA from Mentha citrata . Samples nanodropped: LNR1 3.4 ng/ul, LNR2 6.2 ng/ul, LNR3 7.3 ng/ul
* E. coli containing p404GALS and pDZ207 from Addgene were grown on LB plates with ampicilin. These were miniprepped using a Viogen kit. Samples nanodropped: p404GALS (A) 130.2 ng/ul, p404GALS (B) 112.3 ng/ul, pDZ207 (A) 145.3 ng/ul, pDZ207 (B) 84.1 ng/ul.
'''April 3rd'''
* Extracted genomic DNA again from Arabidopsis thaliana . Sample nanodropped: LNS1 53.4 ng/ul, LNS2 585.2 ng/ul
* Ran gel on LNR1, LNR2, LNR3, LNS1, LNS2, SAB1, and SAB2. All show high weight DNA bands, with Linalool (S) samples having the brightest.
April 4th
April 5th
April 7th
April 24th
April 25th
April 27th
April 29th
Summer 2014 May
June
July
<img src="" align="right" width="270" > Fall 2014 August
September
September 17th
September 18th
September 19th
September 20th
September 20th
September 26th
October 5th
October 7th
October 9th
October 10th
October 11th
October 12th
October 13th
October 14th
October 15th
October 16h
|