Team:Wageningen UR/notebook/journal/resistance
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/cf/Wageningen_UR_journal_resistance_hplc_first_try.png" width="800px"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/cf/Wageningen_UR_journal_resistance_hplc_first_try.png" width="800px"> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
- | Left: | + | Left: HPLC calibration curve. </br> |
- | Right: | + | Right: Fusaric acid breackdown |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p>The HPLC method used delivered a linea calibration curve, but peak resolvance was not optimal, with the FA peak having overlap with several smaller peaks in the samples with <i>P. putida</i>. Therefore it was decided to repeat the experiment to improve the HPLC method. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Initial results on fusaric acid breakdown showed signs of breakdown, but because peak resolvance was not optimal and the measurements were not done in duplo more data was needed to draw conclusions.</p> | ||
<p>Based on the initial results a more elaborate experiment was started. Six samples were grown in duplo:</p> | <p>Based on the initial results a more elaborate experiment was started. Six samples were grown in duplo:</p> |
Revision as of 01:29, 18 October 2014