Team:SUSTC-Shenzhen/gRNA Design
From 2014.igem.org
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
title=gRNA Design| | title=gRNA Design| | ||
subtitle=Not Only a Part of Modelling}} | subtitle=Not Only a Part of Modelling}} | ||
- | + | {{SUSTC-Math-Enabled}} | |
{{SUSTC-Shenzhen/main-content-begin}} | {{SUSTC-Shenzhen/main-content-begin}} | ||
Line 345: | Line 345: | ||
We have selected gRNA sequences with the best theoretical quality using the experimental formula: | We have selected gRNA sequences with the best theoretical quality using the experimental formula: | ||
\begin{math} | \begin{math} | ||
- | + | \prod\_{e\in{\mathcal{M}}}\left(1-\space W[e]\right)\times\frac{1}{\left(\frac{(19\space-\space\bar{d})}{19}\times4\space+\space1\right)}\times\frac{1}{n^2\_{mm}} | |
\end{math} | \end{math} | ||
Revision as of 00:19, 18 October 2014
gRNA Design
Not Only a Part of Modelling
Contents |
(Here we take HIV-1 as an example)
We used a method derived from the method described in the paper by Feng Zhang[http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n9/abs/nbt.2647.html ZhangFgRNA].
Conserved Sequence Analysis
We first tried to extract all conserved regions from the NIH HIV-1 Reference Genome using BioEdit. In this step, we found around 10 alternatives for the next process. Here all screening processes are done in a per-strain basis because of the high mutability of the HIV-1 virus.
Supplementary Table 1 - Base Percentage of HIV-1 Aligned Genome 730bp-752bp | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A % | G % | C % | T % | Empty % | Non Empty % | A(Corrected) | G(Corrected) | C(Corrected) | T(Corrected) | |
730 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56.47 | 43.53 | 56.47 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 100.00% |
731 | 0 | 55.88 | 0 | 0.59 | 43.53 | 56.47 | 0.00% | 98.96% | 0.00% | 1.04% |
732 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56.47 | 43.53 | 56.47 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 100.00% |
733 | 0 | 54.71 | 0 | 1.18 | 43.53 | 55.89 | 0.00% | 97.89% | 0.00% | 2.11% |
734 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58.24 | 41.76 | 58.24 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 100.00% |
735 | 56.47 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 41.76 | 58.24 | 96.96% | 1.01% | 1.01% | 1.01% |
736 | 0 | 1.18 | 57.06 | 0 | 41.76 | 58.24 | 0.00% | 2.03% | 97.97% | 0.00% |
737 | 1.18 | 57.06 | 0 | 0.59 | 41.18 | 58.83 | 2.01% | 96.99% | 0.00% | 1.00% |
738 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 60 | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
739 | 0.59 | 0 | 58.82 | 0 | 40 | 59.41 | 0.99% | 0.00% | 99.01% | 0.00% |
740 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | ||||
741 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | ||||
742 | 0.59 | 0 | 1.18 | 58.24 | 40 | 60.01 | 0.98% | 0.00% | 1.97% | 97.05% |
743 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 40 | 60 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 100.00% | 0.00% |
744 | 0 | 1.18 | 58.82 | 0 | 40 | 60 | 0.00% | 1.97% | 98.03% | 0.00% |
745 | 0 | 58.82 | 1.18 | 0 | 40 | 60 | 0.00% | 98.03% | 1.97% | 0.00% |
746 | 0.59 | 0 | 59.41 | 0 | 40 | 60 | 0.98% | 0.00% | 99.02% | 0.00% |
747 | 0.59 | 59.41 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 60 | 0.98% | 99.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
748 | 0.59 | 59.41 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 60 | 0.98% | 99.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
749 | 0 | 58.82 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 40 | 60 | 0.00% | 98.03% | 0.98% | 0.98% |
750 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 58.24 | 0.59 | 40 | 60.01 | 0.98% | 0.98% | 97.05% | 0.98% |
751 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 60 | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
752 | 59.41 | 0.59 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 60 | 99.02% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Table 1. Base-wise Statistics of One Designed Sequence
As we can see from Table 1, this sequence is highly conserved among about 50% of HIV-1 strains.
Strip out sequences without PAM
Select gRNA sequences with the best theoretical quality
HIV-1 Quasi-Conservative gRNAs(Useful) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sequence | Rating(Zhang) | Rank(Church) | Free Energy(Approx.) | |
GTGTGGAAAATCTCTAGCAGTGG | 71 | - | -1.4 | HIV1_REF_2010 |
TCTAGCAGTGGCGCCCGAACAGG | 97 | - | -1.3 |
In this step, we used the tools from Feng Zhang and George Church to analyze off-target activity. Still, we did BLAST ourselves to verify the results.
We have selected gRNA sequences with the best theoretical quality using the experimental formula: \begin{math} \prod\_{e\in{\mathcal{M}}}\left(1-\space W[e]\right)\times\frac{1}{\left(\frac{(19\space-\space\bar{d})}{19}\times4\space+\space1\right)}\times\frac{1}{n^2\_{mm}} \end{math}