Team:Evry/Biology/CellCharacterization/Antibiotics

After having succeeded to make our bacteria grow, we tested their resistance to different antibiotics. Knowing their resistance to antibiotics is very important because it will allow us to finalize protocols of selection after transformation.
We chose to test the most commonly used antibiotics. We included the three antibiotics used in iGEM (kanamycin, chloramphenicol and ampicilin), plus the erythromycin and the tetracyclin. We chose the erythromycin to test a conjugation protocol which required this antibiotic for E.coli, and we chose to test tetracyclin because it is quite often used for inducible systems.

Table3: Concentrations tested for each antibiotic

We tested several concentrations of each antibiotics (cf: Table3), and we added a supplementary concentration for erythromycin because it is known to be not very effective on GRAM- bacteria.

The sensitivity tests were performed in four different conditions (cf: Figure3). We tested on Marine Broth (MB) 1X plates, MB 0.5X plates (used for conjugation) and M9-CASA 1X (+3% NaCl). We also tested in liquid M9-CASA 1X (+3% NaCl) to have a test in liquid culture, but unfortunately we cannot test on liquid MB cultures because this media is no usable for the spectrometer, so we cannot have a good information about the cells' growth.
The cells' sensitivity was measured on our strain Pseudovibrio denitrificans, E. coli, and different clones of E. coli transformed with plasmids and carrying an acquired resistance AmpR, KanR, CamR ou ErmR.

Figure3: Protocol of antibiotics' tests on Pseudovibrio denitrificans.

We let all the media incubating at 30°C (with shaking for liquid cultures), and they have been checked at day 1, day 2 and day 3. In the following figures, find the results obtained after three days of cultures on plates and one day of liquid cultures.

Figure4: Results of antibiotics' tests on MB plates.
On the left: Results on MB 0.5X plates.
On the right: Results MB 1X.
The number of CFU was impossible to consider on as lot of plates because of the presence of cellular lawn. The purcentage of cells growth on plates were calculated by taking the controls of the same bacteria growing without antibiotics as reference.

Figure5: Results of antibiotics' tests for M9-CASA+3%NaCl media.
On the left: Results on M9-CASA+3%NaCl 1X plates.
On the right: Results in liquid M9-CASA+3%NaCl 1X.
The number of CFU was impossible to consider on as lot of plates because of the presence of cellular lawn. The purcentage of cells growth on plates were calculated by taking the controls of the same bacteria without antibiotics as reference. The ΔOD (600nm) was calculated by substrating the initial OD(600nm) at Day0 from the OD(600nm) of the considered day.

Unfortunately, results for tetracyclin on MB media are not useful. In deed, all our bacteria have grown. It can be because of a technical problem with the drug, or it can also be explained by the presence of some genes bringing a resistance to this drug in Pseudovibrio denitrificans (see section Genome assembly). But the death of our cells on M9 plates don't allow to confirm this hypothesis, even if it can by explain by a conditionnal expression of these genes.
We can also see that Pseudovibrio denitrificans manage to grow on very high concentrations of ampicilin. By sequencing our bacteria, we found resistance gene to ampicilin too. This drug is so not really usefull, except in a huge concentration.
However, this year, biobricks have to be cloned in PSB1C3, and we have very good results for chloramphenicol. According to these results, we know that we can select transformed Pseudovibrio denitrificans on a concentration of chloramphenicol adjusted to the ratio 1/1000 (cf: Table3).
To use other drugs, best ratio (Growth on antibiotic/Growth on medium only) allowed to determine optimal concentrations to use on our different media (cf: Table4).

Table4: Concentrations which can be used for selection of Pseudovibrio denitrificans