Team:INSA-Lyon/Results
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 269: | Line 269: | ||
<li><a href="#contenu4" onclick="$('#contenu4').slideToggle('slow')"><h1><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d5/Insa_fleche_titre.png" width="20px" />Promoter optimization and characterization</h1></a><hr/></li> | <li><a href="#contenu4" onclick="$('#contenu4').slideToggle('slow')"><h1><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d5/Insa_fleche_titre.png" width="20px" />Promoter optimization and characterization</h1></a><hr/></li> | ||
<ul id="contenu4" style="list-style-type: none !important;display:none;"> | <ul id="contenu4" style="list-style-type: none !important;display:none;"> | ||
- | <li><p> | + | <li> |
- | < | + | |
- | < | + | <p> |
- | The | + | As a follow-up to the exploration of curli production and nickel chelation, we want to know the kinetics behind the 70 base-pair long promoter sequence that we used through this whole summer. |
+ | In fact, it has the interesting property of being activated at 37°C instead of the 30°C of the natural 750 base-pair CsgA promoter from where it is orginially isolated. However, we explored these two promoters' kinetics at 30 and 37°C by inserting a GFP downstream. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | On a pKK backbone, two essential parts have been assembled: a promoter and a reporter. The reporter in this case is always the same: GFP. However, the promoter is different for each construction. | ||
+ | One a first hand, P70 is the 70 base-pair long promoter sequence and when combined to the reporter GFP is called p70:GFP. | ||
+ | On a second hand, P750 is the 750 base-pair long promoter sequence coding for the inter-genic regulation for curli production and combined to the report GFP is called P750:GFP.</br> | ||
+ | The idea behind the two constructions is shown in the figure below. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
- | <img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/f/fb/2.png"></br></div> | + | <img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/f/fb/2.png"></br> |
+ | </div> | ||
- | < | + | |
- | < | + | <p> |
- | + | <b>Early growth stage promoter kinetics</b></br> | |
- | + | During the early growth stages at 37°C, we can observe that the P70 (orange) has a higher GFP expression level compared to the P750 (red). | |
- | + | However at 30°C, both P70 (light blue) and P750 (dark blue) have low GFP expression levels. | |
+ | We conclude that P70 has the ability to prematurely activate downstream expression at 37°C | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div align="center"> | ||
+ | <img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/58/PromoterExpression_EarlyStage.png"></br> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <b>Late growth stage promoter kinetics</b></br> | ||
+ | During the late growth stages at 37°C, we can observe that both P70 (orange) and P750 (red) have a downregulated GFP expression and are moving toward lower expressions. | ||
+ | However at 30°C, P70 (light blue) stabilizes within the range of low GFP expressions and P750 (dark blue) reaches the highest GFP expression values. | ||
+ | We conclude that P750 has a delayed, albeit extremely high high-leveled, GFP expression at 30°C. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div align="center"> | ||
+ | <img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f9/PromoterExpression_LateStage.png"></br> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</ul> | </ul> |
Revision as of 21:16, 17 October 2014