Team:Penn/Supplement

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 62: Line 62:
<div id = "figureBox" style = "margin-left: auto; margin-right:auto; width: 700px; text-align:center;"> <img style = "width: 700px;" src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/85/Table_Absorbance_Media_Types.png">
<div id = "figureBox" style = "margin-left: auto; margin-right:auto; width: 700px; text-align:center;"> <img style = "width: 700px;" src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/85/Table_Absorbance_Media_Types.png">
</div>
</div>
-
 
+
<p> The Plate Reader Absorbance showed that different trendlines did not need to be made for each AMB-1 media type since the absorbance varies so little between them. Hence, all OD measurements were standardized via the formula <b>Absorbance = 1.62(Ap-.0491).</b></p>
<div id = "figureBox" style = "margin-left: auto; margin-right:auto; width: 700px; text-align:center;"><img style = "width: 700px;" src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6c/001graph.png">
<div id = "figureBox" style = "margin-left: auto; margin-right:auto; width: 700px; text-align:center;"><img style = "width: 700px;" src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6c/001graph.png">
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 21:33, 17 October 2014

University of Pennsylvania iGEM

Supplementary Materials

The Plate Reader Absorbance showed that different trendlines did not need to be made for each AMB-1 media type since the absorbance varies so little between them. Hence, all OD measurements were standardized via the formula Absorbance = 1.62(Ap-.0491).