Team:Imperial/coculture

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 13: Line 13:
                                 </li>
                                 </li>
-
                                 <li><a data-scroll href="#methods">Methods</a>
+
                                 <li><a data-scroll href="#prelim">Preliminary Experiment</a>
                                 </li>
                                 </li>
                                
                                
-
                                 <li><a data-scroll href="#results">Results</a>
+
                                 <li><a data-scroll href="#main">Anderson RFP <em>E. coli</em> and <em>G. Xylinus iGEM </em> co-culture </a>
                                 </li>
                                 </li>
                                 <li><a data-scroll href="#references">References</a>
                                 <li><a data-scroll href="#references">References</a>
Line 53: Line 53:
                     </section>
                     </section>
                      
                      
-
                       <section id="Preliminary Experiment">
+
                       <section id="prelim">
                         <h2>Preliminary Experiment</h2>
                         <h2>Preliminary Experiment</h2>
                         <h3>Methods</h3>
                         <h3>Methods</h3>
Line 77: Line 77:
                         </section>
                         </section>
-
<section id="coculture">
+
<section id="main">
<h2>Anderson RFP <em>E. coli</em> and <em>G. Xylinus iGEM </em> co-culture </h2>
<h2>Anderson RFP <em>E. coli</em> and <em>G. Xylinus iGEM </em> co-culture </h2>

Revision as of 19:46, 17 October 2014

Imperial iGEM 2014

RFP E. coli and G. xylinus iGEM Co-Culture

Overview

Key Achievements

Introduction


The idea of combining E. coli as an efficient cloning organism since it has the largest library of well characterised parts available and G. xylinus as a robust efficient cellulose producing host came about as a way to take advantage of the characteristics of each host. E. coli DH10B has a very short division time of 30 min whereas the Kombucha Isolated Gluconacetobacter strain has been producing bacterial cellulose robustly in a co-culture with yeast. For these reasons, the aim was to have E. coli produce customisable proteins of interest such as metal binding phytochelatin, linked to cellulose binding domains (CBD), simultaneously with cellulose being produced by G. xylinus allowing these proteins to attach to the material, effectively making it a 1 step functionalisation.

In a co-culture of the cellulose-producing and protein-producing species there will be competition for resources and space, and potentially also a symbiosis of some kind. The main hypothesis of this co-culture experiment is that G. xylinus would orient itself in the oxygen rich layers towards the top of the media due to being an obligate aerobe as explained in the BC synthesis pathway section whereas E. coli would orient itself throughout the media but expectedly have a higher concentration in the oxygen depleted bottom media.

In order to have a stable co-culture, at least in the timescales we are conducting our growth and functionalisation, we need to identify potential interactions and regulate the growth of each species. The main variable identified for the interactions was identified as the carbon source of the HS media used, which requires an initial experiment that can inform the choice/combination of carbon source(s) used for the actual experiment containing E. coli with an Anderson promoter controlled RFP gene (J23104) in J61002 and the Kombucha Isolated strain.

Preliminary Experiment

Methods

In terms of measurements, the doubling rate of E. coli of 30 min whilst the doubling rate of G. xylinus is approximately 8 hours, which means that by far the major contribution to total population, and so OD600, is E. coli. Therefore, the OD600 will be used as an indication of the E. coli level in the media. For G. xylinus, the pellicle is assumed to be a direct indication of the population of G. xylinus. Triplicates were used for all carbon feedstocks and HS media was prepared according to the G. xylinus HS media and culturing protocol. A 2 %w/v concentration of carbon source was used. The Kombucha media was prepared according to the Kombucha growth protocol.

15 ml Falcon tubes were inoculated with 12 ml of media, the samples were seeded with a small solid seed of pellicle of the G. xylinus iGEM strain. Lids were kept loosely unscrewed to allow aeration, and samples were incubated at 30°C static. Triplicates were used for all carbon feedstocks and a control of unseeded media was incubated alongside the samples.

Results

Figure 2 a) Level of E. coli growth in HS media co-culture with the G. xylinus iGEM strain for different feedstocks, b) Thickness of the pellicle in the HS media co-culture indicating the growth of the G. xylinus iGEM strain with a dummy scale of 1-5 being used where 5 is a very thick cellulose pellicle
Figure 3: 3 samples of co-culture between E. coli and G. xylinus after 7 days of incubation, a) 50/50 Glucose and glycerol carbon source based HS media with compartmentalisation of clear G. xylinus iGEM at the top and cloudly E. coli below b) Glycerol carbon source based HS media with considerable levels of cloudiness indicating a significant population of E. coli c) Acetic acid carbon source based HS media, very clear media indicating a small population of E. coli

Based on the results depicted in figure 2, feedstocks that allowed growth of both E. coli and G. xylinusE. coli in the media. Figure 2 b) depicts reasonable in G. xylinus growth in glucose, acetic acid, glucose & glycerol 50/50 combination and glycerol. Taking this data into account, glucose & glycerol would be the best candidates for a co-culture. However, the optimum ratio of glucose to glycerol has not been discovered, so 6 combinations of glycerol to glucose ratios would have to be tested.

The samples depicted in figure 3 illustrates qualitatively the significance of carbon source for the co-culture. The 50/50 glucose glycerol based HS media displayed compartmentalisation which can be explained by specialisation of E. coli and G. xylinus according to oxygen levels as hypothesised.

Anderson RFP E. coli and G. Xylinus iGEM co-culture

Figure 4: Co-culture samples of Anderson promoter J23104 in J61002 with G. xylinus iGEM (day 1)

Methods

To set up the co-cultures, an RFP expressing colony was picked from a plate containing J23104 in J61002 and incubated in 300 ml of Ampicillin LB media in a 1000 ml conical flask overnight. Triplicates were set up for 6 different ratios (100/0, 80/20, 60/40, 40/60, 20/80 and 0/100) of glycerol to glucose with the sum of the two being equal to a total 5 %w/v of carbon source. 100 ml conical flasks were set up with 40 ml of HS media, 900 ul of E. coli and a large physical seed of G. xylinus iGEM was added. The seeds were taken from the initial co-culture experiment’s pellicles formed in glucose, glycerol and glucose & glycerol feedstock experiment. The samples were incubated at 30°C, static.

Results

Figure 5: the ratios shown for the graph legend indicate the ratio of glycerol to glucose in the carbon feedstock. a) Level of E. coli growth in HS media RFP co-culture with the G. xylinus iGEM strain for different feedstocks, b) Thickness of the pellicle in the HS media RFP co-culture indicating the growth of the G. xylinus iGEM strain with a dummy scale of 1-5 being used where 5 is a very thick cellulose pellicle.
Figure 6: The 40% glycerol and 60% glucose of carbon feedstock HS media showing expression of RFP of E. coli cells present on bacterial cellulose after 8 days incubation at 30°C static
FFigure 7: top) The 40% glycerol and 60% glucose of carbon feedstock HS media showing expression of RFP of E. coli cells present on bacterial cellulose after 21 days incubation. below) The 40% glycerol and 60% glucose pellicle taken out of the conical flask, still expressing RFP. Pellicle harvested after 21 days of incubation.

Some conical flasks slowly developed expression of RFP in the bacterial cellulose. The ratios of glycerol to glucose in the HS media that first showed expression of RFP on the pellicle was 80/20 as illustrated in figure 6.

After a longer incubation period, the expression of RFP increased as the cell population increased as shown in figure 7.

References