Team:Paris Bettencourt/Project/Foot Odor
From 2014.igem.org
Line 224: | Line 224: | ||
<div id=part2 class=project> | <div id=part2 class=project> | ||
<p class=text2><img id=image2 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/14/Footfig1.jpg"><span class=legende> | <p class=text2><img id=image2 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/14/Footfig1.jpg"><span class=legende> | ||
- | <br><b>Figure 1 | + | <br><b>Figure 1. B.<i>subtilis</i> is gram positive bacterium which is commonly found in the human foot flora, which degrades the leucine aminoacid present in the sweat to produce isovaleric acid.</b> Our strategy is to perturb the leucine degradation pathway by knocking out the vital enzymes in the pathway. The leucine dehydrogenase knock out mutants lacks the capability to produce leucine and prevents the conversion of leucine to 4-methyl 2-oxopentanoate. The isovaleryl-coA dehydrogenase α and β subunit knock mutants lacks the capability of conversion of 4-methyl 2-oxopentanoate to isovaleryl-coA. </span> </br> <br> |
</p> | </p> | ||
<h6>Introduction</h6><br> | <h6>Introduction</h6><br> | ||
Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
<img id=image3 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8f/Isovaleric_acid_diffusion_%281%29.gif"> | <img id=image3 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8f/Isovaleric_acid_diffusion_%281%29.gif"> | ||
<img id=image3 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6b/Smelltestsplited333.jpg"> | <img id=image3 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6b/Smelltestsplited333.jpg"> | ||
- | <br><span class=legende><b>Figure 3 | + | <br><span class=legende><b>Figure 3. The B.<i>subtilis </i> wt and mutant strains were grown overnight in M9 minimal medium.</b> A double blind smell test was performed. Where the subjects were asked to smell the tubes and rank them in the order of 0 to 5. |
- | blind smell test was performed. Where the subjects were asked to smell the tubes and rank them in the order of 0 to 5. | + | |
The data from the smell test was analyzed and plotted with 95% confidence interval. Though there is variation observed | The data from the smell test was analyzed and plotted with 95% confidence interval. Though there is variation observed | ||
between the wt strain and the bcd knock out strain, the difference is not statistically significant. But in the case of bkdaα | between the wt strain and the bcd knock out strain, the difference is not statistically significant. But in the case of bkdaα |
Revision as of 19:38, 17 October 2014
BACKGROUND Foot odor is generally perceived as socially awkward and negative.Bacillus subtilis, a common bacterium that lives on feet is one of the main responsible of the bad foot odor.One of the molecules produced by B. subtilis uses the leucine degradation pathway to produce isovaleric acid, which smells like parmesan cheese. |
AIMS There are a many commercially available solutions for this problem, current products indiscriminately target bacteria on the foot skin microbiome which can have negative effects on skin health and microbiome dynamics. We aim to develop a targeted approach to prevent foot odor, by selectively killing microbes responsible for the biosynthesis of volatile compounds. |
RESULTS Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras elementum mauris interdum lacus venenatis aliquet. In ac nulla semper, convallis orci non, vestibulum nisi. Maecenas quis ultricies tellus. |
Aims and Achievement | Introduction | Results | Methods | References |
Aims and Achievement
Foot odor is generally perceived as socially awkward and negative. Although there are a many commercially available solutions for this problem, current products indiscriminately target bacteria on the foot skin microbiome. These type of products can have negative effects on skin health and microbiome dynamics. We aim to develop a targeted approach to prevent foot odor, by selectively killing microbes responsible for the biosynthesis of volatile compounds which compose the characteristic stinky feet smell, without destroying the beneficial microbes.
Figure 1. B.subtilis is gram positive bacterium which is commonly found in the human foot flora, which degrades the leucine aminoacid present in the sweat to produce isovaleric acid. Our strategy is to perturb the leucine degradation pathway by knocking out the vital enzymes in the pathway. The leucine dehydrogenase knock out mutants lacks the capability to produce leucine and prevents the conversion of leucine to 4-methyl 2-oxopentanoate. The isovaleryl-coA dehydrogenase α and β subunit knock mutants lacks the capability of conversion of 4-methyl 2-oxopentanoate to isovaleryl-coA.
Introduction
Foot odor (or bromhidrosis) is a condition in which a particular type of body odor, generally considered to be unpleasant, gets produced by bacteria during the catabolism of nutrients present in the sweat. Although sweat is almost odorless, the microbial volatile compounds that are formed as by-products of bacterial metabolism are perceived as an unpleasant smell. Bacillus subtilis, a common bacterium that lives on feet and it is thought to produce the malodorous molecules behind this socially awkward condition. One of the molecules produced by B. subtilis uses the leucine degradation pathway to produce isovaleric acid, which smells like parmesan cheese. It is considered to be to dominant odor tone of bromhidrosis.
Figure 3. The B.subtilis wt and mutant strains were grown overnight in M9 minimal medium. A double blind smell test was performed. Where the subjects were asked to smell the tubes and rank them in the order of 0 to 5.
The data from the smell test was analyzed and plotted with 95% confidence interval. Though there is variation observed
between the wt strain and the bcd knock out strain, the difference is not statistically significant. But in the case of bkdaα
knock out strain and the wt strain there is clearly a statistically significant variation observed. This confirms that the
bkdaα knock out strain produces less malodor compare to the wild type.
Results
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut imperdiet diam eget quam imperdiet imperdiet. Mauris dapibus risus felis, sed ornare diam accumsan aliquet. Sed eu turpis porta, porttitor tortor et, condimentum augue. Curabitur a maximus nisi. Vivamus vitae magna ex. Donec congue auctor odio vitae tempus. In a gravida neque, et tristique tortor. Phasellus a odio sit amet enim ornare lobortis. Morbi sodales, diam non rutrum aliquam, ligula mauris consectetur urna, sed interdum quam risus sit amet enim. Aenean euismod enim magna, id pretium eros molestie non. Proin rutrum lobortis leo, sit amet congue erat. Nulla congue pellentesque augue porta dignissim. Pellentesque quis ex sollicitudin, condimentum risus varius, aliquet ipsum. Ut pulvinar aliquet maximus. Praesent imperdiet interdum commodo.
Methods
Synthetic sweat: The chemical constituents present in the human sweat were analyzed with the aid of gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy. Synthetic sweat was prepared by diluting the exact concentration of all the amino acids and salts found in human sweat, the pH of the synthetic sweat was adjusted to 6.5 with the aid of a pH meter. The synthetic sweat was then autoclaved and stored at 4°C to avoid bacterial contamination. M9 minimal media: The minimal media was prepared by diluting 1ml of 50% glucose 1.1 ml of mgso4.3H20 2ml of 1% w/v casmino acids 2ml of 10mg/ml of tryptophan in 100 ml of distilled water The media is then filter sterilized under a laminar air flow cabinet. Strain: The leucine dehydrogenase, isovaleryl coA alpha subunit and isovaleryl coA beta subunit. The knockout strains were obtained from Bacillus Genetic Stock Centre, where the knockout library of the B.subtilis was generated by replacing each gene with the erythromycin cassette. The mutant strains are trp- so they require supplementation of tryptophan in the growth media. The knockout strains were validated with the PCR reaction. Growth curve: The growth kinetics of the wild type and the mutant strains of B.subtilis were studied with the aid of micro plate reader to have insights about the fitness advantage and disadvantage within the mutant and wild type strain. Smell test: The presence of isovaleric acid in the bacterial culture was sensed with double blind smell test, where neither the subject nor the experimenter is aware of the tube labels. In order to optimize this smell test we grew the B.subtilis in odorless M9 minimal media. The media was supplemented with 0.1% of leucine to study the influence of leucine in production of foot odor. Sock experiment: The bacterial cell culture is diluted in synthetic sweat till it reaches 0.1 OD. The sock was soaked in the synthetic sweat and hanged till it dry. After this step 2 cm2 of sock was cut and soaked in 5ml of 1% PBS. The tubes were stirred gently and supernatant is diluted in PBS to prepare 1X and 10X concentration of B.subtilis. The bacteria were then plated on LB agar.