Team:StanfordBrownSpelman/Biodegradability
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 151: | Line 151: | ||
<img class="reduceSize" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/18/GFP_IPTG_NEGATIVE.JPG"> | <img class="reduceSize" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/18/GFP_IPTG_NEGATIVE.JPG"> | ||
<img class="reduceSize" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/43/GFP_IPTG_POSITIVE.JPG"> | <img class="reduceSize" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/43/GFP_IPTG_POSITIVE.JPG"> | ||
- | <h6><center><b>Figure | + | <h6><center><b>Figure 5. </b>Flow-Cytometer Data & Graphs from fluorescence testing for quorum sensing construct. </center></h6> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<div id="subheader" class="small-8 small-centered columns"> <h6 class="introText"> | <div id="subheader" class="small-8 small-centered columns"> <h6 class="introText"> | ||
- | Flow-cytometry is a laser-based technology that has a wide-range of uses, including multiparametric cell counting and cell sorting. In this study, we utilized the cell counting ability of a flow cytometer in order to determine how many of our cells were expressing GFP after being induced with IPTG (a lac analog). The “X-Median” seen on the three tables above shows the fluorescence intensity of all of the cells that were counted that were not considered dead (Median). | + | |
+ | Flow-cytometry is a laser-based technology that has a wide-range of uses, including multiparametric cell counting and cell sorting. In this study, we utilized the cell counting ability of a flow cytometer in order to determine how many of our cells were expressing GFP after being induced with IPTG (a lac analog). The three graphs and tables above represent the flow-cytometer data obtained from three samples of lac-deficient E. coli cells. One of the samples was a negative control of LB-cultured E. coli cells (Negative Control), and the other two samples (IPTG-Positive and IPTG-Negative) had the GFP-quorum sensing construct. The IPTG-Positive sample had a ~6X increase in GFP expression over the background IPTG-Negative cells, showing our construct worked correctly. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br></br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The “X-Median” seen on the three tables above shows the fluorescence intensity of all of the cells that were counted that were not considered dead (Median). | ||
Each sample measured 50,000 cells (Seen under All Events - Count), and then counted all of the cells that were alive (Median - Count), where each sample had between 47,000 and 49,000 live cells. From the data, and as illustrated in the graphs above, we can gather that the fluorescence intensity (X-Median) of the LB only cells was approximately 63 arbitrary fluorescence units (AFU), the IPTG-negative cells was ~17,000 AFU, and the intensity of the IPTG-positive cells was ~107,000 AFU, meaning that the IPTG-positive quorum sensing cells increased fluorescence intensity over 6X the background intensity (IPTG-negative cells). | Each sample measured 50,000 cells (Seen under All Events - Count), and then counted all of the cells that were alive (Median - Count), where each sample had between 47,000 and 49,000 live cells. From the data, and as illustrated in the graphs above, we can gather that the fluorescence intensity (X-Median) of the LB only cells was approximately 63 arbitrary fluorescence units (AFU), the IPTG-negative cells was ~17,000 AFU, and the intensity of the IPTG-positive cells was ~107,000 AFU, meaning that the IPTG-positive quorum sensing cells increased fluorescence intensity over 6X the background intensity (IPTG-negative cells). | ||
These results indicate that our quorum sensing construct works and greatly increases GFP expression when activated through IPTG-induction. The IPTG-negative cells also expressed some non-negligible degree of GFP, which suggests that the construct could still be improved further. However, the successful proof of concept of our quorum sensing construct is incredibly promising and allows us to proceed toward the next step. | These results indicate that our quorum sensing construct works and greatly increases GFP expression when activated through IPTG-induction. The IPTG-negative cells also expressed some non-negligible degree of GFP, which suggests that the construct could still be improved further. However, the successful proof of concept of our quorum sensing construct is incredibly promising and allows us to proceed toward the next step. | ||
- | <br> | + | <br></br> |
Since we know that the quorum sensing construct is functional and inducible with IPTG. We can now work towards replacing the GFP gene with the genes for our degradation enzymes, allowing us to control degradation by applying IPTG at different time points. | Since we know that the quorum sensing construct is functional and inducible with IPTG. We can now work towards replacing the GFP gene with the genes for our degradation enzymes, allowing us to control degradation by applying IPTG at different time points. | ||
- | <br> | + | <br></br> |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | After successfully transforming the esterase gene into E. coli, and confirming via colony PCR, we grew up a large culture of transformed cells and used this to extract and purify the esterase protein. | + | In conjunction with working on controlling the initiation of degradation, we simultaneously worked with our two degradation enzymes, esterase and cellulase. After successfully transforming the esterase gene into E. coli, and confirming via colony PCR, we grew up a large culture of transformed cells and used this to extract and purify the esterase protein. |
</div></div> | </div></div> | ||
<div class="small-7 small-centered columns"><br><center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/30/Sbs_igem_esterasepcrfinal.jpg><br> | <div class="small-7 small-centered columns"><br><center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/30/Sbs_igem_esterasepcrfinal.jpg><br> | ||
- | <h6><center>This is an image of a gel electrophoresis done after running colony PCR with E. coli colonies transformed with our esterase gene | + | <h6><center><b>Figure 6. </b>This is an image of a gel electrophoresis done after running colony PCR with E. coli colonies transformed with our esterase gene (1.5 kB).</center></h6> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
Line 179: | Line 182: | ||
</div></div> | </div></div> | ||
<div class="small-7 small-centered columns"><center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a9/Sbs_igem_esteraseproteingelfinal.jpg><br> | <div class="small-7 small-centered columns"><center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a9/Sbs_igem_esteraseproteingelfinal.jpg><br> | ||
- | <h6><center>This is the SDS-page gel that was run after purifying the esterase protein from bacteria. The band is at 43 kDa, | + | <h6><center><b>Figure 7. </b>This is the SDS-page gel that was run after purifying the esterase protein from bacteria. The band is at 43 kDa, the expected size of the esterase protein.</center></h6> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
Line 189: | Line 192: | ||
</div></div> | </div></div> | ||
<div class="small-7 small-centered columns"><center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/62/Sbs_igem_esteraseassayfinalfinal.jpg><br> | <div class="small-7 small-centered columns"><center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/62/Sbs_igem_esteraseassayfinalfinal.jpg><br> | ||
- | <h6><center>This image shows the results from our staining assay on cellulose acetate. The pieces of cellulose acetate were soaked in esterase enzyme for varying amounts of time before their level of degradation was tested using the blue cellulose-binding dye.</center></h6> | + | <h6><center><b>Figure 8. </b>This image shows the results from our staining assay on cellulose acetate. The pieces of cellulose acetate were soaked in esterase enzyme for varying amounts of time before their level of degradation was tested using the blue cellulose-binding dye.</center></h6> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> |
Revision as of 07:27, 17 October 2014