Kit Introduction

In recent years the ability to expand the genetic code has been made possible by re-coding the amber stop codon, UAG, via the use of modified tRNA synthetase/tRNA pairs. These synthetase/tRNA pairs act together to charge the tRNA with a non-canonical amino acid (ncAA), an amino acid that is not one of the 20 amino acids normally encoded by a codon. While the library of ncAA synthetase/tRNA pairs continues to grow, the properties of each pairing have yet to be systematically characterized using a standardized methodology.

There are certain desired properties of a synthetase/tRNA pair, such as high fidelity and high efficiency, that worth characterizing. Without knowing these properties, cellular processes and products remain vague. The 2014 University of Texas at Austin iGEM Team has developed a method that allows for efficient qualitative and quantitative in vivo characterization of these novel synthetase/tRNA pairs.

Motivation

Figure 1 Translation of non-canonical amino acids.

In order to recode UAG, a synthetase must be mutated to effectively "charge" a ncAA onto the corresponding tRNA. Various methods of directed evolution are typically used to modify a synthetase such that it can interact with and then charge a specific ncAA (Liu et al. 2010). The ncAA synthetases available have ranging levels of reported efficiency and are not well characterized. Many of the ncAA are not widely used, they are published in short articles lacking full documentation, and our own unpublished experiences of working with a number of ncAAs indicate that not all ncAA synthetases are created equal. Thus, we created a standard kit designed to characterize the properties of any ncAA synthetase/tRNA pair. Our goal is to produce a standardized kit that is cheap, reproducible, easy to use, AND easily portable (i.e. you don't need a lot of advanced equipment).

Background

The genetic code is a composition of 20 highly conserved amino acids that are essential to all organisms on Earth. While the genetic code is specific, it is also degenerate, meaning that more than one codon can encode for the incorporation of a specific amino acid. For example, there are six serine codons and three stop codons (called amber, ochre, and opal). By recoding one of the redundant codons, the recoded codon can signal for the incorporation of a non-canonical amino acid (ncAA) rather than the codon's original usage. Of the three stop codons, the amber codon is the least abundant and thus, the easiest and most efficient to recode.

The Shultz lab was the first to expand the genetic code using a unique synthetase/tRNA. This synthetase /tRNA pair originated from M. jannaschii tyrosine RS (Mj-TyrRS) and allowed the cell to incorporate O-methyl-L-tyrosine at the amber codon. Since then, several ncAA synthetase/pairs have been generated. A total of seven ncAAs were used in addition to tyrosine for our project. The full list of amino acids used in this study can be found here.

Complications arise when the genetic code is recoded. In a normal bacterium, release factor RF1 is responsible for terminating translation when the ribosome reaches the amber stop codon. To avoid termination at a UAG amber codon, a strain of E. coli was engineered by the Church and Isaacs groups using MAGE and CAGE to remove all of the amber codons from the genome and knock out the RF1 gene (Isaacs et al. 2011). The resulting strain, called "amberless" E. coli, has all amber codons free to code for any ncAA. When both are present during translation, a synthetase with mutations that allow for the acceptance of an ncAA, charges that ncAA onto its orthogonal tRNA with the amber codon's anticodon, CUA.

Experimental Design and Method

Plasmids

Figure 2 pStG contains the specific ncAA synthetase/tRNA pair being tested. pFRYC and pFRY are the ncAA kit reporter plasmids. pFRYC is the control plasmid that yields GFP and RFP expression regardless of synthetase/tRNA pair or the presence of ncAA. pFRY is a nearly identical plasmid with a single difference, the linker between the GFP and RFP sequences contains an amber codon (star) in place of the tyrosine codon found in pFRYC. Thus, the level of GFP expression for pFRY is directly dependent on the efficiency and fidelity of the synthetase/tRNA pair being tested.

The kit consists of a three plasmid system: pStG, pFRYC, and pFRY (Figure 2).

• pStG contains the ncAA Synthetase/tRNA pair (St) to be tested as well as a Gentamicin (G) resistance gene.
• pFRYC is the control plasmid and contains an IPTG-induced reporter system and a kanamycin resistance gene. The reporter system is composed of RFP and sfGFP fused via a linker sequence between the two.
• pFRY is the experimental reporter plasmid and is nearly identical to pFRYC with the exception that its linker sequence contains an amber codon (star in Figure 2) in the middle of the linker, whereas pFRYC contains a tyrosine codon in the same location.

Using The Kit

To use the kit properly, each culture must have two of the three plasmids from above. There must always be a pStG plasmid as well as either pFRYC or pFRY. However, additional controls can be conducted using only one of the three plasmids.

Figure 3 Schematic demonstrating the gene expression of the kit plasmids under different growth conditions in the presence of IPTG.
A) pFRYC (+/-) pStG, (+/-) ncAA.
B) pFRY (-) pStG, (+/-) ncAA.
C) pFRY (+) pStG, (-) ncAA.
D) pFRY (+) pStG, (+) ncAA.
The above results represent the "perfect" tRNA synthetase/tRNA pair: one that has 100% fidelity and 100% efficiency. Actual synthetase/tRNA pairs will occasionally misincorporate an incorrect amino acid, and these pairs will not always be perfectly efficient at conducting every step in the process of reading through an amber codon.

• A) In a cell containing pStG and pFRYC, the ribosome will translate the RFP reporter, linker, and sfGFP, producing red and green fluorescent proteins that result in visible yellow fluorescence (Figure 3A). This happens because the reporter contains no amber codon, and thus does not require a ncAA synthetase/tRNA pair.

• B) If a cell contained only pFRY, without pStG, then the ribosome will translate the RFP and terminate at the amber codon on the linker producing a red fluorescence (Figure 3B). This occurs because without the pStG, the amber codon is not recoded to allow for ncAA incorporation.

• C) In a cell containing pStG and pFRY, there are multiple possible outcomes, depending on what is present in the culture. In the absence of ncAA, the ribosome will translate the RFP and terminate at the amber stop codon on the linker producing a red fluorescence (Figure 3C). This occurs because while the codon has been recoded, there is no ncAA and without ncAA there can be no incorporation at the amber codon.

• D) In a cell containing pStG and pFRY, there are multiple possible outcomes. In the PRESENCE of ncAA, the ribosome will translate the RFP, then it incorporates the ncAA at the amber codon in the linker, and finally it proceeds to translate the downstream sfGFP reporter, producing a visible yellow fluorescence (Figure 3D). This occurs because the synthetase found in pStG can covalently attach the ncAA to the tRNA gene present in pStG. This "charged tRNA" is then present during translation, allowing incorporation of the ncAA into the reporter protein.

However, the above scenarios assume that the synthetase/tRNA pair function efficiently and with high fidelity.

• Actual synthetase/tRNA pairs sometimes have low fidelity, leading to the incorporation of an incorrect amino acid. This "misincorporation" means that such a synthetase/tRNA pair would not give results that mimic Figure 3C in the absence of ncAA. Rather, in the absence of ncAA, such a pair would give results similar to Figure 3D, full expression of RFP and sfGFP. High rates of misincorporation are equivalent to low fidelity, and tRNA synthetases with low fidelity are not ideal.

• Actual synthetase/tRNA pairs can also sometimes have low efficiency. As these are artificially selected pairs, sometimes they do not function as well as natural synthetase/tRNA pairs. In such a case, the amount of sfGFP translated in Figure 3D might be significantly lower than expected. low efficiency is also not ideal as it may limit levels of protein expression.

Experimental Preparation

Protection of light-sensitive ncAAs using a foil-wrapped incubator.

An ncAA synthetase/tRNA pair was cloned into pStG and transformed into pFRYC amberless E. coli and pFRY amberless E. coli. Other necessary control strains include RFP amberless E. coli (RFP control), sfGFP amberless E. coli (GFP control), amberless E. coli (cell background control), and LB media supplemented with ncAA (media background control). An overnight culture of each strain was grown in LB with the appropriate antibiotics at 37ºC and 225rpm. 10 mL of media with the appropriate antibiotics was inoculated with 100 µL of overnight culture and allowed to grow in the same conditions until the culture density was ~0.2-0.3 OD, or ~3 hours. The 10 mL culture was split between 4 different sterile test-tubes, 2 mL of culture per tube. The conditions of the four test tubes were as follows:

• -IPTG,-ncAA
• -IPTG,+ncAA
• +IPTG, -ncAA
• +IPTG, +ncAA

If the cultures did not have IPTG or an nCAA, an equal volume of sterile deionized water was added in order to keep the volumes between cultures constant. Once the water, the IPTG, and the ncAA were added appropriately, the cultures were allowed to grow to ~0.5 OD 600. 70 µL of each culture condition and control culture were added to a separate well in a transparent 96-well plate for fluorescence and OD readings using a fluorometer.

Influences that resulted from ncAA addition were accounted for and should be noted. These include: light-sensitivity, oxidation, and interference with fluorescence readings. Certain ncAAs were protected from light due to their light-sensitive molecular structures such as ONBY and AzF. These ncAAs were prepared in a dark room and wrapped in foil. All cultures were grown in a foil-wrapped incubator for consistency. Some ncAAs are more prone to oxidation specifically as L-dopa. When oxidized, the solution turns black. To prevent oxidation, each ncAA was prepared the day of the test for consistency. By this method, the oxidation of L-dopa did not occur quickly enough to have an effect on the data. Most ncAA solutions were transparent once prepared with the exception of 3-nitrotyrosine. The yellow-orange tint of 3-nitrotyrosine solution was accounted for by measuring the fluorescence of 1mM 3-nitrotyrosine in media and subtracting any possible background fluorescence from culture fluorescence grown in 1mM 3-nitrotyrosine.

Preparation for the ncAA Kit Test

A picture showing culture with or without IPTG. Without IPTG, there is no induction of GFP (left). With IPTG, strong fluorescence is easily seen (right).

Results and Data

Fidelity of Incorporation

Figure 4. Graph showing the level of GFP fluorescence relative to RFP fluorescence for each condition. Each pStG plasmid is referred to based on the tRNA synthetase/tRNA pair present in the specific plasmid. Each of these plasmids was then paired with either pFRY or pFRYC and grown in the presence or absence of a specific ncAA. For example, the "3-AminoY-FRYC" and the "3-AminoY-FRY" samples both contain the 3-AminoY synthetase/tRNA pair and both samples were grown in the absence or presence of the ncAA "3-AminoY". Data are presented as the average of three independent cultures. Error bars denote standard deviation.

Set the experiment up - What do we want to test? How are we going to test it (keep it simple)? You may just need to rearrange the paragraph. We wanted to test whether the ncAA synthetase/tRNA pairs would incorporate anything besides their amino acid at the amber stop codon (UAG), and that they would in fact incorporate their specific ncAA if it was present. The fidelity of each ncAA sythetase/tRNA pair was measured by comparing the production of GFP in cultures containing pStG/pFRY with or without ncAAs. In the absence of an ncAA only RFP should be translated, as translation is expected to terminate between RFP and GFP at the amber stop codon on the linker sequence in pFRY. Alternatively, if the corresponding ncAA for pStG is present or if the synthetase/tRNA pair has low fidelity and can misincorporate a different amino acid, translation should continue through the UAG. In this case, RFP and GFP should both be translated. We also tested pStG/pFRYC strains in (+/-) ncAA conditions as a control for what effect the ncAA has on the fluorescence or growth of the cells. These strains should express RFP and GFP in all conditions since pFRYC does not have an amber stop codon in the linker (Figure 2). However, if the presence of ncAA affects cell growth or fluorescence activity, we will need these controls to determine the extent of the effect.

To determine the change in GFP fluorescence when the ncAA was present, we first had to calculate how much GFP was expressed relative to the RFP, which would give an upper estimate of how much GFP could theoretically be expressed. We first divided both the GFP and RFP levels by the OD 600 of the culture in order to get the per cell fluorescence levels. We then normalized the GFP fluorescence for one culture to its RFP fluorescence so that we could compare the GFP fluorescence levels between cultures. The normalized GFP values were then compared between cultures grown in the presence of ncAA and cultures grown in the absence of ncAA, which would indicate how the level of GFP fluorescence changes when the ncAA is present. When these values were graphed (Figure 4), some synthetase/tRNA pairs such as 4-azidophenylalanine, 3-nitrotyrosine, 3-iodotyrosine, and ortho-nitrobenzyltyrosine resulted in higher GFP fluorescence in the presence of ncAA than in the absence of ncAA, which suggests that those synthetases only incorporated an amino acid if their specific amino acid was present, meaning that they have a high fidelity. However, the other synthetase/tRNA pairs (3-aminotyrosine, L-DOPA, and cyanophenylalanine) did not show a significant increase in GFP fluorescence normalized to RFP fluorescence when the ncAA was present, indicating that they would incorporate other amino acids at the amber stop codon when their specific amino acid was not present (and perhaps even when it was), and thus have a low fidelity.

Synthetase Efficiency

Another measure of quality for these ncAA synthetase/tRNA pairs is how efficiently they incorporate their ncAA. An inefficient synthetase/tRNA pair will only incorporate their ncAA a fraction of the time, even when their ncAA is present. Our system can be used to measure this level of efficiency, though it does not indicate why a particular synthetase is efficient or inefficient. By comparing the level of GFP fluorescence to the normalized level of RFP fluorescence when the amino acid is present, we can see how efficient the synthetase is. In essence, if the normalized fluorescence of GFP relative to RFP is close to 100% (if the GFP is expressed roughly 100% of the time that RFP is expressed), then the synthetase is very efficient. On the other side, if say the normalized fluorescence of GFP relative to RFP is closer to 10%, then the synthetase would not be very efficient, because even when the ncAA was there, it only incorporated it at the amber stop codon (UAG) about 10% of the time.

For our results (Figure 4), two synthesase/tRNA pairs stood out as relatively inefficient: 3-nitrotyrosine and ortho-nitrobenzyltyrosine. Both of these synthetase/tRNA pairs showed a significantly smaller normalized GFP to RFP fluorescence when the amino acid was present with the pFRY construct. While they both show a significant increase in normalized GFP to RFP fluorescence when the amino acid was present compared to when it was absent, which indicates a high fidelity, the actual GFP fluorescence relative to the RFP fluorescence was only around 50% for 3-nitrotyrosine and 20% for ortho-nitrobenzyltyrosine. These results suggest that for whatever reason, these synthetase/tRNA pairs do not always incorporate their ncAA at the amber stop codon.

Incorporation Value

Figure 5.
May need to consider a different naming convention or the cultures. Possibly AY-C and AY-E for Control and Experimental?? The fluorescence and OD600 readings of each culture were used to calculate a value for incorporation efficiency of each synthetase. Need to add an explanation of how these values were calculated

Start by explaining the incorporation value... what does it mean? To determine the incorporation value for each synthetase/tRNA pair, ______________.

• specifically, what values did we look at and compare? NOT OD600.

The synthetase/tRNA pairs that showed the highest incorporation values include 4-azidophenylalanine, 3-nitrotyrosine, ortho-nitrobenzyltyrosine, and 3-iodotyrosine in decreasing order. Among the ncAAs tested, ONBY consistently slowed the growth rate of the culture significantly (as seen by OD600 readings, data not shown) suggesting possible toxicity to the cell. However, ncAA incorporation remained high. Synthetase/tRNA pairs that showed the lowest levels of ncAA incorporation include 3-aminotyrosine, L-DOPA, and 4-cyanophenylalanine.

Discussion

What's your most important result? DISCUSS THAT FINDING FIRST.

Our ncAA measurement kit was able to successfully compare the fidelity and efficiency of seven different synthetase/tRNA pairs. We were able to confidently say that one synthetase/tRNA pair had a higher fidelity than another. While the measurements may not be perfectly accurate due to the nature of this test, the measurement kit is designed more around ease of use, cost-efficiency, and portability. The ncAA measurement kit can be used to quickly test a synthetase/tRNA pair's quality with minimal effort, as opposed to other more accurate but more intensive or expensive measures such as mass spectrometry. While mass spectrometry can give much more definitive information about a synthetase/tRNA pair, there are many different factors that could make it unreasonable for undergraduate research. It is a technique that requires a fair amount of skill to do properly, and can be very costly as well. For the ncAA measurement kit, all that is necessary is to order the kit parts (pFRYC and PFRY in separate strains of amberless E. coli) from the iGEM registry, transform the synthetase/tRNA pair in question into the two different cell strains, and run the experiment. Thus, our measurement kit works best as a preliminary test to get a solid frame of reference for how a synthetase/tRNA pair works in a cell. This application could greatly speed up the process of developing a new synthetase/tRNA pair, as well as characterizing large groups of synthetase/tRNA pairs.

Due to the nature of the ncAA Kit Test, in vivo influences will affect certain data and results. This knowledge is very useful by providing a broader and biological perspective of in vivo perspective of cellular health. In general, the presence of ncAAs slowed the growth of amberless E. coli, sometimes quite significantly. This artificially inflated some of the final values that we calculated, which decreased the accuracy of the results. Influences that resulted from ncAA addition such as light-sensitivity, oxidation, and interference with fluorescence readings were accounted for in order to make the final measurements as accurate as possible.

Are these three paragraphs discussing the results/significance of the results? Yes, we want to talk about possible sources of error, but we don't need three paragraphs for that. We want to talk about what our results mean in a larger context: Does the kit work? Can it be easily improved on? What does our kit do for other labs, for other iGEM teams? For the field of ncAAs? Is the kit definitive by itself? Were there limitations? What might influence good/bad results? Can we unequivocally argue that dopa/3-amino and other ncAA synthetases are worthless?

What about the gold medal questions:

Demonstrate a substantial improvement over the state of the art in cost, efficiency, precision, resolution, and/or other relevant capabilities of your measurement technique.

Increase the ease of accessibility and portability of methods to other laboratories of a new measurement technique of your choosing.

Conclusion

This year the UT Austin iGEM Team has chosen to take part in the Measurement Track of the iGEM competition by contributing to ncAA methods of analysis and fulfilling medal criteria. Our team has successfully designed a unique testing kit for ncAA incorporation in vivo using common reporter parts to characterize very uncommon synthetase/tRNA machinery. In addition, we have used our kit to analyze and characterize seven different ncAA synthetase/tRNA pairs as well as tyrosine RS. This method of testing was designed to be undergraduate administrable, transportable, and more affordable than other methods of characterization and analysis.

ncAA Table

ncAA	Molecular Structure	Molecular Weight (g)	Soluble in	Other Notes
tyrosine (canonical)		181.19	Soluble in water Heat to 70°C and vortex to dissolve Must stay warm to remain in solution	Stock Concentration: 10mM Concentration in Culture: 1mM
3-aminotyrosine		287.14	Soluble in water Heat to 70°C and vortex to dissolve	Stock Concentration: 10mM Concentration in Culture: 1mM
3-nitrotyrosine		226.2	Soluble in water Heat to 70°C and vortex to dissolve	Stock Concentration: 10mM Concentration in Culture: 1mM
3-iodotyrosine		307.09	Soluble in water Heat to 70°C and vortex to dissolve	Stock Concentration: 10mM (.122g in 10mL H20) Concentration in Culture: 1mM
L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA)		197.1879	Soluble in water Heat to 70°C and vortex to dissolve	Stock Concentration: 10mM Concentration in Culture: 1mM
o-(2-nitrobenzyl)tyrosine (ONBY)		316.308	Soluble in 50% DMSO in Water Heat up to 70°C and add NaOH to dissolve	Stock Concentration: 50mM Concentration in Culture: 1mM Light Sensitive
4-azidophenylalanine (AzF)		206.204	Soluble in 10% DMSO in Water Requires heating and overnight shaking to dissolve	Stock Concentration: <10mM (.02g in 10mL) Concentration in Culture: 1mM Light Sensitive
4-cyanophenylalanine (CNF)		190.2	Soluble in water Heat to 70°C and vortex to dissolve	Stock Concentration: 10mM Concentration in Culture: 1mM

ncAA Synthetase Table

References

• Alfonta, L., Zhang, Z., Uryu, S., Loo, J. A., Schultz, P. G. (2003) Site-specific incorporation of a redox-active amino acid into proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:14662-14663.
• Chin, J. W., Santoro, S. W., Martin, A. B., King, D. S., Wang, L., Schultz, P. G. (2002) Addition of p-azido-L-phenylalanine to the genetic code of Escherichia coli. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1294:9026-9027.
• Deiters, A., Groff, D., Ryu, Y., Xie, J., Schultz, P. G. (2006) A genetically encoded photocaged tyrosine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 45:2728-2731.
• Isaacs, F. J., Carr, P. A., Wang, H. H., Lajoie, M. J., Sterling, B., Kraal, L., Tolonen, A.C., Gianoulis, T.A., Goodman, D.B., Reppas, N.B., Emig, C.J., Bang, D., Hwang, S.J., Jewett, M. C., Jacobson, J. M., Church, G.M. (2011) Precise manipulation of chromosomes in vivo enables genome-wide codon replacement. Science 333:348-353
• Liu, C. C., Schultz, P. G. (2010) Adding New chemistries to the genetic code. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79:413-44.
• Neumann, H., Hazen, J. L., Weinstein, J., Mehl, R. A., Chin, J. W. (2008) Genetically encoding protein oxidative damage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130: 4028-4033.
• Sakamoto, K., Murayama, K., Oki, K., Iraha, F., Kato-Murayama, M., Takahashi, M., Ohtake, K., Kobayashi, T., Kuramitsu, S., Shirouzu, M., Yokoyama, S. (2009) Genetic encoding of 3-iodo-L-tyrosine in Escherichia coli for single-wavelength anomalous dispersion phasing in protein crystallography. Structure. 17: 335-344.
• Schultz, K. C., Supekova, L., Ryu, Y., Xie, J., Perera, R., Schultz, P. G. (2006) A genetically encoded infrared probe. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129:13984-13985.
• Seyedsayamdost, M. R., Xie, J., Chan, C. T. Y., Schultz, P. G., Stubbe, J. (2007) Site-specific insertion of 3-aminotyrosine into subunit α-2 of E . coli ribonucleotide reductase: Direct evidence for involvement of Y₇₃₀ and Y₇₃₁ in radical propagation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129: 15060–15071.
• Wang, L., Brock, A., Herberich, B., Schultz, P. G. (2001) Expanding the genetic code of Escherichia coli. Science 292: 498–500.