Team:INSA-Lyon/Results
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
<li><p> | <li><p> | ||
- | + | <p>For the Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy biofilm acquisitions, all the strains were cultivated in 96-wells microplate in M63 Mannitol during 16H at 30°C (See Protocole for details). See results in Figure 3.</p> | |
+ | |||
+ | Figure 3: Engineered bacteria biofilm characterization and quantification using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy | ||
+ | |||
+ | All the strains used are constitutively fluorescent to allow detection with confocal laser microscopy (ZEISS LSM510 META, 40X/1.3OILDIC, laser Argon 4 lines 30 W 458 nm, 477 nm, 488 nm, 514 nm, see Protocole). Positive control/CsgA+ (Wild-type E.coli curli producing strain); Negative control/CsgA- (csgA-knockout E.coli strain); BBa_CsgA (BBa_K1404006); BBa_CsgAHis1 (BBa_K1404007); BBa_CsgAHis2 (BBa_K1404008). A) Biofilm sections obtained by Z-stack acquisitions. B) Biofilm 3D reconstruction using IMARIS® from acquisitions in A). C) Bio-volume quantification and maximum of thickness measurement using COMSTAT2 (ImageJ). The strain marked with a star is significantly different from all others (Tukey’s test, p<0.05). | ||
+ | |||
+ | As no strains carrying our parts show a significant difference with the positive control, our parts insertion doesn’t modify the biofilm formation property. The His-Tag and His2-Tag engineered CsgA doesn’t disturb the curli formation. | ||
+ | |||
</p></li> | </p></li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> |
Revision as of 22:05, 16 October 2014