Team:Vanderbilt MF/Project
From 2014.igem.org
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
<h2><b><span style="color:#ffffff"> | <h2><b><span style="color:#ffffff"> | ||
Methods</b><br> | Methods</b><br> | ||
- | </h2> | + | </h2> |
+ | <span style="color:#ffffff"> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
<span style="color:#ffffff"> | <span style="color:#ffffff"> | ||
- | <h3><b>Developing low cost, easy to design microfluidic device fabrication method</h3></b> | + | <h3><b><span style="color:#ffffff"> Developing low cost, easy to design microfluidic device fabrication method</h3></b> |
Our team utilized a unique microfluidic development process that emphasizes low cost and rapid prototyping. Through the use of open source design software and cheap manufacturing methods we were able to fabricate microfluidic devices in a cost and time efficient manner. It is our hope that these methods can be utilized by other iGEM teams who are interested in incorporating microfluidics into their projects without the hassle of complex design and fabrication techniques.<br> | Our team utilized a unique microfluidic development process that emphasizes low cost and rapid prototyping. Through the use of open source design software and cheap manufacturing methods we were able to fabricate microfluidic devices in a cost and time efficient manner. It is our hope that these methods can be utilized by other iGEM teams who are interested in incorporating microfluidics into their projects without the hassle of complex design and fabrication techniques.<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | <h3><b>Microfluidic Computer Aided Design</h3></b> | + | <h3><b><span style="color:#ffffff"> Microfluidic Computer Aided Design</h3></b> |
Several programs were used by members on the team to design and ultimately fabricate microfluidic devices. Initially, traditional computer aided design software packages were used such as AutoCAD and Solidworks. These packages provide advanced features which designers can wield to make complex devices with varying functions such as mixing and trapping cells. Alternative software packages were explored such as the open source vector graphics software Inkscape which proved to be easy to use in the design of a microfluidic device. Inkscape is an open source analogue to Adobe Illustrator, a common vector graphics editing software. Inkscape is easy to use and with a few online tutorials, ideas for microfluidic designs can be turned into realities.<br> | Several programs were used by members on the team to design and ultimately fabricate microfluidic devices. Initially, traditional computer aided design software packages were used such as AutoCAD and Solidworks. These packages provide advanced features which designers can wield to make complex devices with varying functions such as mixing and trapping cells. Alternative software packages were explored such as the open source vector graphics software Inkscape which proved to be easy to use in the design of a microfluidic device. Inkscape is an open source analogue to Adobe Illustrator, a common vector graphics editing software. Inkscape is easy to use and with a few online tutorials, ideas for microfluidic designs can be turned into realities.<br> | ||
- | <h3><b>Microfluidic Prototyping using a Vinyl Cutter<br></h3></b> | + | <h3><b><span style="color:#ffffff"> Microfluidic Prototyping using a Vinyl Cutter<br></h3></b> |
In order to rapidly prototype microfluidic devices of different geometries and designs, our team explored fabrication techniques that bypassed the complicated photolithography process that is standard for microfluidic devices in research laboratories. Photolithography has the benefit of achieving very fine resolution and fine details for pinpoint fluid manipulation, but it is detracted from its lengthy creation process. The time scale from device design to fabrication of a working device using photolithography is on the order of 2-3 days and uses a variety of expensive and highly technical equipment that is not readily accessible to many iGEM teams. <br> | In order to rapidly prototype microfluidic devices of different geometries and designs, our team explored fabrication techniques that bypassed the complicated photolithography process that is standard for microfluidic devices in research laboratories. Photolithography has the benefit of achieving very fine resolution and fine details for pinpoint fluid manipulation, but it is detracted from its lengthy creation process. The time scale from device design to fabrication of a working device using photolithography is on the order of 2-3 days and uses a variety of expensive and highly technical equipment that is not readily accessible to many iGEM teams. <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 100: | Line 101: | ||
7) With tweezers and razor blade, pick up the cutout and place on a glass slide<br> | 7) With tweezers and razor blade, pick up the cutout and place on a glass slide<br> | ||
8) Flatten the cutout onto the glass slide, this creates the “master” with which microfluidic devices can be manufactured | 8) Flatten the cutout onto the glass slide, this creates the “master” with which microfluidic devices can be manufactured | ||
- | <h3><b>Fabricating a PDMS device using a Vinyl Master<br></b></h3> | + | <h3><b><span style="color:#ffffff"> Fabricating a PDMS device using a Vinyl Master<br></b></h3> |
9) Prepare a PDMS solution with 10:1 ratio of PDMS to epoxy and mix well<br> | 9) Prepare a PDMS solution with 10:1 ratio of PDMS to epoxy and mix well<br> | ||
10) Pour the PDMS mixture on top of the master, making sure that the PDMS spreads out over the whole petri dish and covers the master evenly.<br> | 10) Pour the PDMS mixture on top of the master, making sure that the PDMS spreads out over the whole petri dish and covers the master evenly.<br> | ||
Line 110: | Line 111: | ||
16) Once the device holes have been punched, the device can be plasma bonded to a glass slide or coverslip by treating the bottom of the microfluidic device (where the channels are open) with a plasma wand or plasma oven for 45 seconds and then bonding to a plasma treated glass slide.<br> | 16) Once the device holes have been punched, the device can be plasma bonded to a glass slide or coverslip by treating the bottom of the microfluidic device (where the channels are open) with a plasma wand or plasma oven for 45 seconds and then bonding to a plasma treated glass slide.<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | <span style="color:#ffffff"> | ||
The final device will consist of a PDMS slab with microfluidic geometries embedded on the bottom of the slab. Fluids can be run through the device by either directly pipetting them through the inlet or by affixing microfluidic tubing with 1/16” OD to the inlet and pumping fluids in using a fluid pump such as a syringe pump or peristaltic pump.<br> | The final device will consist of a PDMS slab with microfluidic geometries embedded on the bottom of the slab. Fluids can be run through the device by either directly pipetting them through the inlet or by affixing microfluidic tubing with 1/16” OD to the inlet and pumping fluids in using a fluid pump such as a syringe pump or peristaltic pump.<br> | ||
Revision as of 21:38, 16 October 2014
|
Methods
|